On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:20:41PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 09/02/09 at 16:33 +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> > * dann frazier [Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:26:40 -0700]:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > > > Please upload a manual build this time. If you'
On 09/02/09 at 16:33 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * dann frazier [Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:26:40 -0700]:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > > Please upload a manual build this time. If you're in a position to do
> > > the same for hppa, please do that as well, el
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Lucas Nussbaum [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:43:40 +0100]:
>
> > On 05/02/09 at 14:12 +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > > * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:48 +0100]:
>
> > > > On alpha, there's a segfault during the build. Manual b
* dann frazier [Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:26:40 -0700]:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > Please upload a manual build this time. If you're in a position to do
> > the same for hppa, please do that as well, else we'll migrate ruby1.9 -9
> > without hppa.
> > Please r
* Lucas Nussbaum [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:43:40 +0100]:
> On 05/02/09 at 14:12 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:48 +0100]:
> > > On alpha, there's a segfault during the build. Manual builds on porter
> > > machines do work, though.
> > Failed again with the sa
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:51:15PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:00:43PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> > dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > >> ruby1.9 still fails to build on hppa and alpha.
> > >>
> > >> On hppa, i
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:00:43PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> ruby1.9 still fails to build on hppa and alpha.
> >>
> >> On hppa, it's caused by a kernel bug, which was partially fixed (at
> >> least the k
dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> ruby1.9 still fails to build on hppa and alpha.
>>
>> On hppa, it's caused by a kernel bug, which was partially fixed (at
>> least the kernel doesn't panic() anymore). Since the issue is related to
>> threading
On 05/02/09 at 14:12 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:48 +0100]:
>
> > On alpha, there's a segfault during the build. Manual builds on porter
> > machines do work, though.
>
> Failed again with the same exact segfault.
Do you want me to upload a manual build
* Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:48 +0100]:
> On alpha, there's a segfault during the build. Manual builds on porter
> machines do work, though.
Failed again with the same exact segfault.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
hey Lucas!
> ruby1.9 still fails to build on hppa and alpha.
>
> On hppa, it's caused by a kernel bug, which was partially fixed (at
> least the kernel doesn't panic() anymore). Since the issue is related to
> threading, it is
11 matches
Mail list logo
