On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:56:52AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this yesterday but nothing seems
to have happened. The most recent version of my package (monotone)
failed to build on alpha due to a single failure in its testsuite (see
On Nov 30, 2007 11:35 AM, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The test that failed is known to succeed most of the time but
occasionally fail for no apparent reason; if the package is retried it
should build fine. Who should I be bothering?
No one; you should fix your package so that
On Nov 30, 2007 11:47 AM, Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is monotone some programing language? It doens't look like any language
I have seen before. It looks like the test has gone through a few
revisions to try and deal with race conditions, maybe they haven't got
it right yet.
I sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this yesterday but nothing seems
to have happened. The most recent version of my package (monotone)
failed to build on alpha due to a single failure in its testsuite (see
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:47:48PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:56:52AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this yesterday but nothing seems
to have happened. The most recent version of my package (monotone)
failed to build on
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:56:52AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this yesterday but nothing seems
to have happened. The most recent version of my package (monotone)
failed to build on alpha due to a single failure in its testsuite (see
6 matches
Mail list logo