On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 11:55 +0100, Tim Cutts wrote:
> On 9 Jul 2008, at 6:36 pm, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 13:22:18 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Any ideas why the alpha buildd still shows "
On 9 Jul 2008, at 6:36 pm, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 13:22:18 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hello,
Any ideas why the alpha buildd still shows "needs build" for hypre
after
two weeks?
there's still a big backlog as the alpha buildd was more or less d
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 19:36 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 13:22:18 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Any ideas why the alpha buildd still shows "needs build" for hypre after
> > two weeks?
>
> there's
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 13:22:18 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any ideas why the alpha buildd still shows "needs build" for hypre after
> two weeks?
there's still a big backlog as the alpha buildd was more or less down
for 2 weeks recently. Things don&
Hello,
Any ideas why the alpha buildd still shows "needs build" for hypre after
two weeks? In that time, alpha buildds have twice attempted opencascade
which is vastly larger and non-free...
Cheers,
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
E
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 07:09:20PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> So when is the alpha buildd expected to be back up and running after its
> cross-country trip?
Don't know what cross-country trip that might be but FYI I've just
restored goedel and got a 2.6 kernel running
So when is the alpha buildd expected to be back up and running after its
cross-country trip?
Plus or minus a day would be fine.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in
the interest of efficiency.)" --Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
otags failed on alpha due to a broken ocaml package. A fixed ocaml
package has since been uploaded and now otags should build fine. Please
requeue it for the alpha buildds.
Cheers,
- -Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> I should be able to do binNMUs for alpha if someone could point me at
> the source packages/versions that need building.
Thanks, but they have since been picked up.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>Roger Leigh wrote:
>>>
>>>>There are at least two RC bugs waiting stuck at Needs-Build on the
>>>>alpha buildd (samba, ettercap) for quite a while now. Has the alpha
>>>&
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 11:09:30AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> There are at least two RC bugs waiting stuck at Needs-Build on the
> alpha buildd (samba, ettercap) for quite a while now. Has the alpha
> buildd keeled over?
The "while" has been barely 24 hours at this point;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
>> There are at least two RC bugs waiting stuck at Needs-Build on the
>> alpha buildd (samba, ettercap) for quite a while now. Has the alpha
>> buildd k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are at least two RC bugs waiting stuck at Needs-Build on the
alpha buildd (samba, ettercap) for quite a while now. Has the alpha
buildd keeled over?
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp
Roger Leigh wrote:
> There are at least two RC bugs waiting stuck at Needs-Build on the
> alpha buildd (samba, ettercap) for quite a while now. Has the alpha
> buildd keeled over?
Yes, we had experienced a problem yesterday. Thiemo got the machine back
up abut stopped the buildd. T
This is not so good:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=hunit&ver=1.0-4&arch=alpha&stamp=1098890884&file=log&as=raw
After unpacking 143MB of additional disk space will be used.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault.
apt-get failed.
Package installation failed
I built 1.
[Please Cc: to me because I'm not on -alpha list]
I had problems building last hasciicam packages on a few archs, because
of bad headers. Now I see this problem only on alpha buildd:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=hasciicam
Last try is here:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php
Thimo Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> mpg123.c:837: error: unrecognizable insn:
> (insn 555 554 2298 32 0x2f87918 (set (reg/f:DI 366)
> (symbol_ref:DI ("@Lmpg123_ip"))) -1 (nil)
> (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (symbol_ref:DI ("@Lmpg123_ip"))
> (nil)))
> mpg123.c:837: internal
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:38:17PM -0500, Kelledin wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2003 06:37 pm, Josip Rodin wrote:
> [...]
> > I tried to build it on escher and faure and it worked fine on
> > both, there was no such failure. I couldn't do it on lully
> > itself as there was no libgtk1.2-dev (m
On Saturday 27 September 2003 06:37 pm, Josip Rodin wrote:
> The buildd on lully persistently can't build Input/mpg123 in
> xmms 1.2.8 and unfortunately it's 2>/dev/null'ed (standard
> libtool procedure, or so they say).
The "standard libtool procedure," as I understand it, is to
compile each sou
Hi,
The buildd on lully persistently can't build Input/mpg123 in xmms 1.2.8
and unfortunately it's 2>/dev/null'ed (standard libtool procedure, or so
they say).
I tried to build it on escher and faure and it worked fine on both, there
was no such failure. I couldn't do it on lully itself as there
> > > hmmm...i think it's coping quite well. So far all the packages that do
> > > fail to build have been packing problems except those listed on the web
> > > site (http://build.tdyc.com/) which is still incomplete...and of the
> >
> > s/build/buildd/
>
> http://buildd.tdyc.com/logs/ only li
> > > By my daily list of out of date alpha packages, it looks like it's
> > > not really coping that well... Where are the build logs, so that
> > > manual fixing of stuff can be done without getting in the way of
> > > stuff that *does* get built correctly by the build daemon?
> >
> > hmmm...i t
On Fri 20 Apr 2001, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Fri 20 Apr 2001, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
>
> > hmmm...i think it's coping quite well. So far all the packages that do
> > fail to build have been packing problems except those listed on the web
> > site (http://build.tdyc.com/) which is still incompl
On Fri 20 Apr 2001, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > By my daily list of out of date alpha packages, it looks like it's
> > not really coping that well... Where are the build logs, so that
> > manual fixing of stuff can be done without getting in the way of
> > stuff that *does* get built correctly by
> By my daily list of out of date alpha packages, it looks like it's
> not really coping that well... Where are the build logs, so that
> manual fixing of stuff can be done without getting in the way of
> stuff that *does* get built correctly by the build daemon?
hmmm...i think it's coping quite w
On Sat 17 Mar 2001, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
>
>Well thanks to Ryan Murray the build seems to be running now. I'm
> shy one binary needed to properly process the logs but should have that
> by tomorrow... So I'd like to ask those building packages for Alpha to
> hold off and see how the buildd
Hi all,
Well thanks to Ryan Murray the build seems to be running now. I'm
shy one binary needed to properly process the logs but should have that
by tomorrow... So I'd like to ask those building packages for Alpha to
hold off and see how the buildd does things...
there are some packages that
27 matches
Mail list logo
