On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:36:37AM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
Good work! Keep testing, run some benchmarks please.
I im interested about improvements from interpreted JS from 3.6
to interpreted JS in 4.0 :)
I don't have anything formal in the way of benchmarks. However, a web
site I visit
On 05-11 00:49, Bob Tracy wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 02:48:05PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
Build successfully completed. Segfaults immediately on invocation: no
surprise there. I'll report back when I've got something working, and I
expect that will be a while: the combination of tool
On 11/05/11 17:49, Bob Tracy wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 02:48:05PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
Build successfully completed. Segfaults immediately on invocation: no
surprise there. I'll report back when I've got something working, and I
expect that will be a while: the combination of tool
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:02:06PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
Nice!
Thanks...
Could you send through those patches to get 4.0.1 working please?
Attached. They're small enough to risk offending the few debian-alpha
subscribers who might not be interested :-).
(...) But as Witold has pointed
Build successfully completed. Segfaults immediately on invocation: no
surprise there. I'll report back when I've got something working, and I
expect that will be a while: the combination of tool chain updates and
the huge size of the mozilla code base makes for tedious debugging.
--Bob
--
To
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 02:48:05PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
Build successfully completed. Segfaults immediately on invocation: no
surprise there. I'll report back when I've got something working, and I
expect that will be a while: the combination of tool chain updates and
the huge size of the
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:12:36AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
On 07/05/11 07:11, Bob Tracy wrote:
Just a quick note to let interested parties know I'm working on a 4.0.1
firefox build for alpha.
Cool! Are you working only on upstream firefox or also on iceweasel in
experimental?
Just on
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Michael Cree mc...@orcon.net.nz wrote:
BTW, I don't think anyone has implemented the Alpha specific code for IPC.
I think firefox has to be compiled with --disable-ipc. IIRC, the
architecture specific code is a set of atomic operations, of which the
On 08/05/11 04:02, Matt Turner wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Michael Creemc...@orcon.net.nz wrote:
BTW, I don't think anyone has implemented the Alpha specific code for IPC..
I think firefox has to be compiled with --disable-ipc. IIRC, the
architecture specific code is a set of
On 08/05/11 00:38, Bob Tracy wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:12:36AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
On 07/05/11 07:11, Bob Tracy wrote:
Just a quick note to let interested parties know I'm working on a 4.0.1
firefox build for alpha.
Cool! Are you working only on upstream firefox or also on
Just a quick note to let interested parties know I'm working on a 4.0.1
firefox build for alpha. Frankly, the effort should be worthwhile: I'm
impressed with how much more fleet of foot 4.0.1 is relative to 3.6.12
on my AMD K6-III/450, and I expect similar performance improvement on my
PWS 433au.
On 07/05/11 07:11, Bob Tracy wrote:
Just a quick note to let interested parties know I'm working on a 4.0.1
firefox build for alpha.
Cool! Are you working only on upstream firefox or also on iceweasel in
experimental? I see the following comment in the iceweasel Debian
changelog:
12 matches
Mail list logo