Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-03-08 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 8 March 2010 14:36, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:44:59PM +, Andrew John Hughes wrote: >> Ok, I didn't realise it was a hard linked copy.  I'll disable that; we >> don't want the ecj patches affecting the main tree. > > Applying a patch to a hardlink copy does not aff

Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-03-08 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:44:59PM +, Andrew John Hughes wrote: > Ok, I didn't realise it was a hard linked copy. I'll disable that; we > don't want the ecj patches affecting the main tree. Applying a patch to a hardlink copy does not affect other copies. patch creates a new file (hence break

Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-03-08 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 8 March 2010 12:41, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 08.03.2010 13:34, Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>> >>> further, is it correct that the -ecj patch is applied to *both* the >>> openjdk >>> and openjdk-ecj directory? >>> >>> $ ls -l build/openjdk*/jdk/src/share/classes/sun/misc/FloatConsts.java >>> -r

Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-03-08 Thread Matthias Klose
On 08.03.2010 13:34, Andrew John Hughes wrote: further, is it correct that the -ecj patch is applied to *both* the openjdk and openjdk-ecj directory? $ ls -l build/openjdk*/jdk/src/share/classes/sun/misc/FloatConsts.java -rw-rw-r-- 2 doko doko 4147 Feb 17 03:14 build/openjdk-ecj/jdk/src/share/cl

Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-03-08 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 8 March 2010 11:45, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 01.03.2010 20:54, Andrew John Hughes wrote: >> >> On 27 February 2010 16:49, Matthias Klose  wrote: >>> >>> Building icedtea6 on alpha and armel using a two stage bootstrap fails >>> with >>> different errors. These are no new errors, just rechecke

Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-03-08 Thread Matthias Klose
On 01.03.2010 20:54, Andrew John Hughes wrote: On 27 February 2010 16:49, Matthias Klose wrote: Building icedtea6 on alpha and armel using a two stage bootstrap fails with different errors. These are no new errors, just rechecked the two stage bootstrap, because the one stage build fails to bui

Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-03-01 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 27 February 2010 16:49, Matthias Klose wrote: > Building icedtea6 on alpha and armel using a two stage bootstrap fails with > different errors. These are no new errors, just rechecked the two stage > bootstrap, because the one stage build fails to build cacao after the b18 > update. On alpha: >

Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-02-28 Thread Oliver Falk
Am 27.02.2010 17:49, schrieb Matthias Klose: are/classes:openjdk/jdk/src/solaris/classes:openjdk/langtools/src/share/classes:openjdk/corba/src/share/classes:/home/doko/openjdk/openjdk-6-6b18~pre1/build/generated' \ -classpath /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/jre/lib/rt.jar \ -bootclass

icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-02-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Building icedtea6 on alpha and armel using a two stage bootstrap fails with different errors. These are no new errors, just rechecked the two stage bootstrap, because the one stage build fails to build cacao after the b18 update. On alpha: mkdir -p lib/rt /home/doko/openjdk/openjdk-6-6b18~pre1