On Tue 05 Sep 2006, Paul Slootman wrote:
> It's naively running that kernel just fine now :-)
Oh yeah,
I did need to tweak arch/alpha/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S a bit, as I got a
warning about a symbol being in the discard section or something like
that. I replaced:
/DISCARD/ : { *(.exit.text) *(.e
On Tue 05 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:54:11AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > The alpha maintainer said, gcc-4.1 is not capable to build the linux
> > kernel, the same applies to m68k. Any other architecture can use it.
> > hppa just did not switch on the last ab
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:54:11AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Will gcc-4.0 be dropped as a build dependency for etch, or be kept?
> The alpha maintainer said, gcc-4.1 is not capable to build the linux
> kernel, the same applies
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Will gcc-4.0 be dropped as a build dependency for etch, or be kept?
The alpha maintainer said, gcc-4.1 is not capable to build the linux
kernel, the same applies to m68k. Any other architecture can use it.
hppa just did not switch o
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Will gcc-4.0 be dropped as a build dependency for etch, or be kept?
It will be dropped.
Currently, only hppa and alpha still build-depend on gcc-4.0. This will
be changed with linux-2.6 2.6.18-1 (and maybe in 2.6.17 too, if
Will gcc-4.0 be dropped as a build dependency for etch, or be kept?
And on which architectures?
Would you mind dropping gcc-4.0 from etch for some architectures?
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo