rct wrote:
> Donsbach, Jeff wrote:
> >
> > Fwiw, the Gentoo alpha port skipped over 7.0 and just recently marked
> > 7.1 as "stable". (I'm not sure why 7.0 was skipped over). So, maybe
> > there would be some merit in trying out 7.1 .
>
> As soon as the 7.1 packages are available (experimental o
Donsbach, Jeff wrote:
>
> Fwiw, the Gentoo alpha port skipped over 7.0 and just recently marked
> 7.1 as "stable". (I'm not sure why 7.0 was skipped over). So, maybe
> there would be some merit in trying out 7.1 .
As soon as the 7.1 packages are available (experimental or unstable),
I'm all over
rom: Ivan Jager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 5:17 PM
To: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: xorg 7.0 and Radeon 7500
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Likewise, if the X problems are believed to be fixed in Xorg 7.1, it
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
Likewise, if the X problems are believed to be fixed in Xorg 7.1, it would
be a good idea to actually test this and report to debian-x precisely what
does or doesn't work in 7.1 vs. 7.0, including as much specifics as possible
about the particular bit of
Here's where things stand as of this morning... I had a chance to try
booting a 2.6.18-rc1 kernel with no drm support, and no framebuffer
support. Objective was to try the xorg.conf radeon driver with no dri
and without possible interference from the framebuffer support. Other
xorg.conf items of
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:15:42AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Mike Campbell wrote:
> > I've removed my previously working radeon 9100 and put the old elsa gloria
> > back in for now because of hard lockups with or without dri.
> > At first, only dri was causing lockups, but now xorg 7 locks up wi
Mike Campbell wrote:
> I've removed my previously working radeon 9100 and put the old elsa gloria
> back in for now because of hard lockups with or without dri.
> At first, only dri was causing lockups, but now xorg 7 locks up with or
> without dri.
>
> Hopefully this will be resolved soon; i'
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:21:47PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Simon Brown wrote:
> > On 13/07/06 13:06:53, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > > Jay Estabrook wrote:
> > > > Have you tried Xorg 7.0.x WITHOUT the radeonfb driver?
> > Just tried it without radeon [dri] and without radeonfb, no change in
> > the re
Simon Brown wrote:
> On 13/07/06 13:06:53, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > Jay Estabrook wrote:
> > > Have you tried Xorg 7.0.x WITHOUT the radeonfb driver?
> Just tried it without radeon [dri] and without radeonfb, no change in
> the result. I don see any system lock ups or oopses:
> Linux bruce 2.6.15-1-a
On 13/07/06 13:06:53, Bob Tracy wrote:
Jay Estabrook wrote:
> Have you tried Xorg 7.0.x WITHOUT the radeonfb driver?
Just tried it without radeon [dri] and without radeonfb, no change in
the result. I don see any system lock ups or oopses:
Linux bruce 2.6.15-1-alpha-generic #1 Mon Mar 6 12:33:2
Jay Estabrook wrote:
> Have you tried Xorg 7.0.x WITHOUT the radeonfb driver?
Tried that last night, and the bad news is it made only a slight
difference. "X -probeonly" (with the radeon driver specified in
xorg.conf) permanently blanked the display as before, but there was
no accompanying kernel
Jay Estabrook wrote:
> I've never tried running the radeonfb driver for text mode and then
> X11, even with Xorg 6.x.x. Sometimes the combination of fb and X has
> been known to cause problems, so...
>
> Have you tried Xorg 7.0.x WITHOUT the radeonfb driver?
I have *not*. That's worth a try, cer
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:42:10AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
>
> Suggestions on things to try would be greatly appreciated. Specifically,
> I'm hoping to find some combination of xorg.conf driver options, screen
> layout, etc. that will do the trick. I'll keep searching for examples
> on-line in t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Tracy) writes:
> As an aside, a definitive opinion that Xorg 7.0.X is badly broken would
> be disappointing, but useful. In that case, what's the recommended
> procedure to downgrade to something that's known to work, and what is
> the latest something that works?
You can
Lots of problems with Xorg 7.0.X reported by other users, and I'll
second them :-(. However, I'd like to give myself a fighting chance
by putting together a xorg.conf file that *should* work if everything
else is copacetic.
Pre-X11 state: machine boots on 2.6.18-rc1 with the "radeonfb" driver
bui
15 matches
Mail list logo
