On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> 5. our users will profit if we can give them at least some support for
> amd64 (means: more than only i386).
6. migrate to a 32/64 port immediately after r0 and schedule r1 few month
later
or
6a. fix all pending bugs on amd64/r0, set it as "official port
Hi,
> i've experienced such problems too. however, i have a ati radeon 9200 gfx
> card but the same motherboard.
> i fixed this problem by not loading the dri module in
> /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
Thanks for the response. Unfortunately your tip was not the one that
solved my problem :(
I've also che
* Xavier Roche ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040726 22:10]:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > 5. our users will profit if we can give them at least some support for
> > amd64 (means: more than only i386).
>
> 6. migrate to a 32/64 port immediately after r0 and schedule r1 few month
> later
>
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:50:54PM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
> because letting a potentially broken, uncomplete (64-bit only) dist for
> a year or two is not very suitable for many users
Not adding pure64 at all is not very suitable for much more of our
users than those two or three who want
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:38:12AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to rebuild the monolithic installer image for amd64.
This is my sources.list.udeb.local:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 unstable
main/debian-installer
I don't use the "local" f
I have been using the vanilla 2.6.7 kernel for sometime on my amd64 box.
I would like to know how good is the debian-amd64 kernel source as I
like to use a modular kernel. I dont have any hardware as of now that
require precompiled binaries to be used by the drivers other than nvidia
which I can co
Dear Porters, dear Developers,
the latest update from the release masters indicate that the release
of sarge is happening quite soon (perhaps by mid-September).[1] I'm
happy with this development. This mail should write up some of the
issues I see for amd64 and sarge, and I welcome feedback.
In
Thanks for your reply.
I hope you will give a status of when the port is ready for public test :-).
Regards
Anders Fugmann
P.s. Your ip address is listed in SORBS (http://www.nl.sorbs.net/), as
beeing a dynamically assigned ip address. You should consider using you
ISP as mail relay for sending m
On 04-Jul-26 19:05, Anders Peter Fugmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see a new directory on alioth named gcc-3.4, which seems to contain
> alot of packages. I guess that this is all the packages compiled with
> gcc-3.4, which generates better code for x86-64 than gcc-3.3.
>
> Is this a complete port (co
Offlate I am seeing this error very often on my machine. I shifted to
the 2.6.7 kernel to get nVidia drivers working and I am seeing these
errors. I never saw them when I was using 2.6.6 kernel. I am using the
vanilla kernel and not the debian kernel.
The error I get is:
atkbd.c: Unkown key releas
Hi,
I see a new directory on alioth named gcc-3.4, which seems to contain
alot of packages. I guess that this is all the packages compiled with
gcc-3.4, which generates better code for x86-64 than gcc-3.3.
Is this a complete port (compared to pure64 on alioth) or should I sill
have pure64 in my
I've applied Nicks patch to the LessTif sources.
Thanks for reporting it.
Danny
--
Danny Backx - danny.backx-at-planetinternet.behttp://up.to/danny.backx
I've applied Nicks patch to the LessTif sources.
Thanks for reporting it.
Danny
--
Danny Backx - danny.backx-at-planetinternet.behttp://up.to/danny.backx
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:38:12AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to rebuild the monolithic installer image for amd64.
> This is my sources.list.udeb.local:
>
> deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 unstable
> main/debian-installer
I don't use the "local" file
On 23/07/2004 Chris Wakefield wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> >You're already running pure-amd64?
>
> Well, I may have embarassed myself, but I assumed that installing from:
> http://debian.inode.at/pure64/
> with the
> http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/sid-amd64-monolithic.iso
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
i've experienced such problems too. however, i have a ati radeon 9200 gfx card
but the same motherboard.
i fixed this problem by not loading the dri module in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
there is another thread in this list, that says 64bit X on 64bit
Hi folks,
I'm trying to rebuild the monolithic installer image for amd64.
This is my sources.list.udeb.local:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 unstable main/debian-installer
But if I run "make build_monolithic_2.6", then I get
# make build_monolithic_2.6
make[2]: `pkg-lists/standard
17 matches
Mail list logo