Re: amd64 and sarge

2004-07-26 Thread Xavier Roche
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Andreas Barth wrote: > 5. our users will profit if we can give them at least some support for > amd64 (means: more than only i386). 6. migrate to a 32/64 port immediately after r0 and schedule r1 few month later or 6a. fix all pending bugs on amd64/r0, set it as "official port

Re: problem running X11

2004-07-26 Thread Thomas J. Zeeman
Hi, > i've experienced such problems too. however, i have a ati radeon 9200 gfx > card but the same motherboard. > i fixed this problem by not loading the dri module in > /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 Thanks for the response. Unfortunately your tip was not the one that solved my problem :( I've also che

Re: amd64 and sarge

2004-07-26 Thread Andreas Barth
* Xavier Roche ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040726 22:10]: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Andreas Barth wrote: > > 5. our users will profit if we can give them at least some support for > > amd64 (means: more than only i386). > > 6. migrate to a 32/64 port immediately after r0 and schedule r1 few month > later >

Re: amd64 and sarge

2004-07-26 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hi, On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:50:54PM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote: > because letting a potentially broken, uncomplete (64-bit only) dist for > a year or two is not very suitable for many users Not adding pure64 at all is not very suitable for much more of our users than those two or three who want

Re: sources.list used to build monolithic?

2004-07-26 Thread Harald Dunkel
Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:38:12AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks, I'm trying to rebuild the monolithic installer image for amd64. This is my sources.list.udeb.local: deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 unstable main/debian-installer I don't use the "local" f

Which kernel to use

2004-07-26 Thread Bharath Ramesh
I have been using the vanilla 2.6.7 kernel for sometime on my amd64 box. I would like to know how good is the debian-amd64 kernel source as I like to use a modular kernel. I dont have any hardware as of now that require precompiled binaries to be used by the drivers other than nvidia which I can co

amd64 and sarge

2004-07-26 Thread Andreas Barth
Dear Porters, dear Developers, the latest update from the release masters indicate that the release of sarge is happening quite soon (perhaps by mid-September).[1] I'm happy with this development. This mail should write up some of the issues I see for amd64 and sarge, and I welcome feedback. In

Re: gcc-3.4 builds

2004-07-26 Thread Anders Peter Fugmann
Thanks for your reply. I hope you will give a status of when the port is ready for public test :-). Regards Anders Fugmann P.s. Your ip address is listed in SORBS (http://www.nl.sorbs.net/), as beeing a dynamically assigned ip address. You should consider using you ISP as mail relay for sending m

Re: gcc-3.4 builds

2004-07-26 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 04-Jul-26 19:05, Anders Peter Fugmann wrote: > Hi, > > I see a new directory on alioth named gcc-3.4, which seems to contain > alot of packages. I guess that this is all the packages compiled with > gcc-3.4, which generates better code for x86-64 than gcc-3.3. > > Is this a complete port (co

Keyboard errors

2004-07-26 Thread Bharath Ramesh
Offlate I am seeing this error very often on my machine. I shifted to the 2.6.7 kernel to get nVidia drivers working and I am seeing these errors. I never saw them when I was using 2.6.6 kernel. I am using the vanilla kernel and not the debian kernel. The error I get is: atkbd.c: Unkown key releas

gcc-3.4 builds

2004-07-26 Thread Anders Peter Fugmann
Hi, I see a new directory on alioth named gcc-3.4, which seems to contain alot of packages. I guess that this is all the packages compiled with gcc-3.4, which generates better code for x86-64 than gcc-3.3. Is this a complete port (compared to pure64 on alioth) or should I sill have pure64 in my

Re: lesstiff bug triggered by grace and ddd programs

2004-07-26 Thread Danny Backx
I've applied Nicks patch to the LessTif sources. Thanks for reporting it. Danny -- Danny Backx - danny.backx-at-planetinternet.behttp://up.to/danny.backx

Re: lesstiff bug triggered by grace and ddd programs

2004-07-26 Thread Danny Backx
I've applied Nicks patch to the LessTif sources. Thanks for reporting it. Danny -- Danny Backx - danny.backx-at-planetinternet.behttp://up.to/danny.backx

Re: sources.list used to build monolithic?

2004-07-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:38:12AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm trying to rebuild the monolithic installer image for amd64. > This is my sources.list.udeb.local: > > deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 unstable > main/debian-installer I don't use the "local" file

Re: Migration from unstable to testing.

2004-07-26 Thread Jonas Meurer
On 23/07/2004 Chris Wakefield wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > >You're already running pure-amd64? > > Well, I may have embarassed myself, but I assumed that installing from: > http://debian.inode.at/pure64/ > with the > http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/sid-amd64-monolithic.iso >

Re: problem running X11

2004-07-26 Thread Andreas Knüpfer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, i've experienced such problems too. however, i have a ati radeon 9200 gfx card but the same motherboard. i fixed this problem by not loading the dri module in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 there is another thread in this list, that says 64bit X on 64bit

sources.list used to build monolithic?

2004-07-26 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks, I'm trying to rebuild the monolithic installer image for amd64. This is my sources.list.udeb.local: deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 unstable main/debian-installer But if I run "make build_monolithic_2.6", then I get # make build_monolithic_2.6 make[2]: `pkg-lists/standard