Dear Goswin
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:45:26PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Doesn't it download the driver at install time? Anything else would be
> non-free.
http://packages.debian.org/nvidia-glx is non-free.
Regards
--
Philipp | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +41 44 632 60 38
Frauenfel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete Harlan) writes:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> Andreas Jochens wrote:
>> >As for stability, I am using the packages from the amd64/gcc-3.4 archive
>> >myself on three machines (on my main desktop and on two servers) since a
>> >few week
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Andreas Jochens wrote:
> >As for stability, I am using the packages from the amd64/gcc-3.4 archive
> >myself on three machines (on my main desktop and on two servers) since a
> >few weeks without any problems. From my own experience
Philipp Frauenfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear Goswin
>
> Am Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:50:40PM +0200 hat Goswin von Brederlow getippert:
>> Please send a patch to the BTS, easiest with "reportbug -A patch
>> nvidia-graphics-drivers".
>
> I would already have done this if the patch would be
"Harald Dunkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> I tried to do a netinst using the gcc-3.4 pool on alioth and
> a monolithic image of a few days ago, but this failed with
> the error message
>
>Bad archive error
>
>The specified Debian archive mirror is either not available,
>
Dear Goswin
Am Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:50:40PM +0200 hat Goswin von Brederlow getippert:
> Please send a patch to the BTS, easiest with "reportbug -A patch
> nvidia-graphics-drivers".
I would already have done this if the patch would be
a) simple
b) small
but it's neither of these. b) can be expl
"Harald Dunkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> That sounds more like an user error. Are you sure you specified the
>>> right url? pure64 and gcc-3.4 identical archive software and have
>>> an identical layout.
>>>
>> I am very sure. I r
my provider setup JFS for me on other machines, swore by it, and they're
quite knowledgable. it also seems to run better than ext3. i'm not
extremely clued in to filesystems, but i've been happy with it thus far
with it.
are there some negatives you're thinking that i should be aware of?
On Wed,
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 12:47 -0700, mike wrote:
> I have
>
> Dual AMD opteron 242 (1.4ghz)
> Tyan Thuner K8S (S2882)
> 2 GB RAM
> 3ware escalade 9500S-8
> 8x250GB WD SATA drives, 7 in raid5 with one hot spare
>
> so nearly same configuration you're asking about.
>
> first off, debian-amd64 scream
I have
Dual AMD opteron 242 (1.4ghz)
Tyan Thuner K8S (S2882)
2 GB RAM
3ware escalade 9500S-8
8x250GB WD SATA drives, 7 in raid5 with one hot spare
so nearly same configuration you're asking about.
first off, debian-amd64 screams on it. it loves it.
originally i had an 8506-8, but they told me p
On 04-Aug-11 20:57, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm opposing any patches getting added to sarge (compared to debians
> sarge). Your patch goes beyond what could still be added to debians
> sarge and way beyond what could be added to base+standard pack
On 04-Aug-11 21:06, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > PS: Did you find a working patch for the grub/initrd/>=4GB boot problem?
>
> Looks like it. The 8GB testsystem boots with it and noone else has
> reported failures yet (current alioth version).
That
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 04-Aug-11 02:57, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > can now be compiled directly in an amd64 environment. All it needs is
>> > an additional Build-Depends on 'gcc-3.4-i386' (and the amd64-specific
>> > gr
Hi,
Have any of you tried to run mpich on debian-amd64?
I am involved in a project to build a cluster, with
* Dual Opteron Nodes
* mpich over ethernet
* Portland Group Compiler (we need Fortran 90 Support)
* MM5 <-- The final goal
(http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/mm5-home.html)
If some of you have s
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 04-Aug-11 02:57, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > The amd64/gcc-3.4 archive (http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4)
>> > finally supports the compilation and linking of 32bit i386 binaries
>
Hi,
for building a new server, I´ve made a list of hardware to consider more
closely. The server should, mainly, act as a SAMBA PDC fileserver and
run an ERP software which is web-based (client written in Java) on top
of a postgres database. It has to serve about 50 users and will probably
in s
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
That sounds more like an user error. Are you sure you specified the
right url? pure64 and gcc-3.4 identical archive software and have
an identical layout.
I am very sure. I replaced /gcc-3.4/ by /pure64/, and the
"Bad archive mirror" message was gone
I'm waiting for my USB keyboard (Logitech "Internet Navigator keyboard")
-> http://www.hersys.com/cat/produit_idprod_937.html
I'll tell you if this is the solution for my problem installing
Debian/amd64 on my notebook
Cya
dberry a écrit :
VETSEL Patrice wrote:
Alex Perry a écrit :
I don't see e
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
is this the right place to ask for advice and about your experience with
dual-Opteron Debian servers?
If you face specific problems, feel free to ask specific questions on
this list...
THX, I´ll go ahead then, opening a new thread :)
GH
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
You can't upgrade (savely). Switching to gcc-3.4 needs a complete
reinstall of all packages.
But it worked pretty well, except for aptitude, as it seems.
Did I mention that a complete install did not work due to
some missing Release file?
Regards
Harri
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
That sounds more like an user error. Are you sure you specified the
right url? pure64 and gcc-3.4 identical archive software and have
an identical layout.
I am very sure. I replaced /gcc-3.4/ by /pure64/, and the
"Bad archive mirror" message was gone.
Regards
Harri
Philipp Frauenfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - I have the following graphics card:
>
> :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX
> 5200] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
> Subsystem: LeadTek Research Inc.: Unknown device 53c3
> Flags: bus maste
"Harald Dunkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Jochens wrote:
>> On 04-Aug-11 15:25, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>>>Hi folks,
>>>
>>>Using aptitude of the gcc-3.4 pool I got an error message
>>>
>>> aptitude: Symbol `_ZTIN4SigC6ObjectE' has different size in shared
>>> object, consider re-linki
"Harald Dunkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> I tried to do a netinst using the gcc-3.4 pool on alioth and
> a monolithic image of a few days ago, but this failed with
> the error message
>
>Bad archive error
>
>The specified Debian archive mirror is either not available,
>
Micky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scrive Pere Castañer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> PS:I have this: "deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sid main"
>> and I can't install nothiing, What I'm doing wrong?
You tell us. Nothing wrong with that deb source.
> I've this:
>
> deb http://debi
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:48:41PM +0200, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
>
> - Netboot did not work. I got an error message "can't open an
> initial console" after the kernel came up. Then it crashed.
I have no idea what went wrong with that build but todays build
doesn't seem to have the problem.
> Now, if you have a better name for the "intel xeon e64mt nocona" kernel
> flavour (preferably something as short as k8 or k8-smp), feel free to
> propose it.
Given that it's just a P4 core with 64bit extentions I'd call it -p4 and
-p4-smp
Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 04-Aug-11 15:25, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
Using aptitude of the gcc-3.4 pool I got an error message
aptitude: Symbol `_ZTIN4SigC6ObjectE' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
Rebuilding aptitude did not work: The new binary died with a
core dump
On Wed, 2004-08-11 14:32:36 +0200, Hans Wilmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> is this the right place to ask for advice and about your experience with
> dual-Opteron Debian servers?
If you face specific problems, feel free to ask specific questions on
this list...
Mf
Hi
Yesterday, I got a brand new amd64 machine in the office. Cool.
It has the following CPU:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 12
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 2800+
I am running the following kernel:
$
On 04-Aug-11 15:25, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Using aptitude of the gcc-3.4 pool I got an error message
>
> aptitude: Symbol `_ZTIN4SigC6ObjectE' has different size in shared object,
> consider re-linking
>
> Rebuilding aptitude did not work: The new binary died with a
> core dump im
Hi folks,
Using aptitude of the gcc-3.4 pool I got an error message
aptitude: Symbol `_ZTIN4SigC6ObjectE' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
Rebuilding aptitude did not work: The new binary died with a
core dump immediately.
???
Harri
Hi folks,
I tried to do a netinst using the gcc-3.4 pool on alioth and
a monolithic image of a few days ago, but this failed with
the error message
Bad archive error
The specified Debian archive mirror is either not available,
or does not have a valid Release file on it.
Would it be possible
On 04-Aug-11 02:57, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > can now be compiled directly in an amd64 environment. All it needs is
> > an additional Build-Depends on 'gcc-3.4-i386' (and the amd64-specific
> > grub-patch, of course).
>
> There is no amd64-specif
Hi,
is this the right place to ask for advice and about your experience with
dual-Opteron Debian servers?
GH
Scrive Pere Castañer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> PS:I have this: "deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sid main"
> and I can't install nothiing, What I'm doing wrong?
I've this:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sid main non-free contrib
# deb-src http://debian-amd64.aliot
I need the sources lists. I have a debian-amd64 minimal system installed
through chroot's way that showed me the howto.
But which are the sources to install the whole system? ( I mean xfrees,
gnomes...etc)
PS:I have this: "deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sid main" and
I can't
On 04-Aug-11 12:08, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> You should mention the sources.list for this. AFAIK its
>
> deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/ unstable main non-free
> contrib
> deb-src http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/ unstable main
> non-free contrib
This is correct. S
Andreas Jochens wrote:
There has not been any decision whether the pure64/gcc-3.3 archive will
be dropped in favor the the amd64/gcc-3.4 archive. There are some 300
packages more available in the pure64/gcc-3.3 archive than in the
amd64/gcc-3.4 amd64/gcc-3.4 at the moment (~8300 vs. ~8000 packages
Am Di, den 10.08.2004 schrieb Manuele Rampazzo um 20:26:
> Mm sis900 didn't work, even if there are some references to ics lan
> phy. Then I've looked for some infos about the nforce3-250 I've got on
> the board and I've patched the custom forcedeth module from the 2.6.7
> debian kernel sour
On 04-Aug-11 09:42, Andreas Kn?pfer wrote:
> hi everybody,
>
> there has been some posts here a while ago saying that the /gcc-3.4
> repository
> is not yet ready, missing packages etc...
>
> now, i'm wondering if it is ready for regular use. is it regarded as stable
> as
> the /pure64 versio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi everybody,
there has been some posts here a while ago saying that the /gcc-3.4 repository
is not yet ready, missing packages etc...
now, i'm wondering if it is ready for regular use. is it regarded as stable as
the /pure64 version?
i'd like to
On 04-Aug-11 02:57, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The amd64/gcc-3.4 archive (http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4)
> > finally supports the compilation and linking of 32bit i386 binaries
> > using the gcc '-m32' switch. The gcc-3.4 package
43 matches
Mail list logo
