Re: [debian-amd64] Re: Recommendations for cheap Linux-compatible Opteron mobo

2004-10-12 Thread mike
i have an athlon 64 3000+ and it was giving the same benchmarks as an opteron 1.6ghz with mysql queries per second, for the most part. so it's good stuff. definately an affordable alternative. On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Peter Cordes wrote: On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:13:55AM +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone

Re: Recommendations for cheap Linux-compatible Opteron mobo

2004-10-12 Thread Stephen Waters
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 22:05, Peter Cordes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:13:55AM +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote: > > Any recommendations for a relatively cheap Linux-compatible opteron > > motherboard? I'm looking forward for acquiring a couple of > > single/dual-opteron boards for server s

Re: 64-bit kernel on sid / pure64?

2004-10-12 Thread Stephen Waters
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 21:13, Ron Johnson wrote: > Now, if the OP's question really was "can a 32-bit X server run > inside a chroot jail on an otherwise pure-64 system", then that > would have elicited a totally different response from me. Clear > writing is always useful. If I replace sid bina

Re: Recommendations for cheap Linux-compatible Opteron mobo

2004-10-12 Thread Peter Cordes
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:13:55AM +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote: > Any recommendations for a relatively cheap Linux-compatible opteron > motherboard? I'm looking forward for acquiring a couple of > single/dual-opteron boards for server stuff. Why not use a socket 754 Athlon64? Unless you ne

Re: 64-bit kernel on sid / pure64?

2004-10-12 Thread Peter Cordes
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 08:25:49PM -0500, Stephen Waters wrote: > Yay! Thanks to help from Peter Cordes, I was able to install the amd64 > k8 smp kernel from sid, amd64-libs, and iptables from pure64 -- and it > works! Great work, everyone! you're welcome :) Last time I tried the amd64 kernel f

Re: 64-bit kernel on sid / pure64?

2004-10-12 Thread Ron Johnson
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 21:14 -0400, Kyle Rose wrote: > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > But then the 64-bit apps aren't really running on that 32-bit box, > > are they? > > Huh? If I run a 32-bit X server in a chroot and a 64-bit app with the > DISPLAY directed to localhost:0.0 (or

Re: 64-bit kernel on sid / pure64?

2004-10-12 Thread Kyle Rose
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But then the 64-bit apps aren't really running on that 32-bit box, > are they? Huh? If I run a 32-bit X server in a chroot and a 64-bit app with the DISPLAY directed to localhost:0.0 (or move the UNIX domain socket to the right place...) then everything

Recommendations for cheap Linux-compatible Opteron mobo

2004-10-12 Thread Paolo Alexis Falcone
Any recommendations for a relatively cheap Linux-compatible opteron motherboard? I'm looking forward for acquiring a couple of single/dual-opteron boards for server stuff. -- Paolo Alexis Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 64-bit kernel on sid / pure64?

2004-10-12 Thread Ron Johnson
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 20:32 -0400, Kyle Rose wrote: > Stephen Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 2) Can 64-bit apps run on a 32-bit Xserver? > > Thanks to the magic of the client/server X protocol, all applications > that don't use the DRI should work fine no matter where the client is > ru

Re: 64-bit kernel on sid / pure64?

2004-10-12 Thread Kyle Rose
Stephen Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2) Can 64-bit apps run on a 32-bit Xserver? Thanks to the magic of the client/server X protocol, all applications that don't use the DRI should work fine no matter where the client is running in relation to the server. Cheers, Kyle

64-bit kernel on sid / pure64?

2004-10-12 Thread Stephen Waters
Yay! Thanks to help from Peter Cordes, I was able to install the amd64 k8 smp kernel from sid, amd64-libs, and iptables from pure64 -- and it works! Great work, everyone! A few questions: 1) Is ALSA going to remain unusable until I upgrade alsa-base/alsa-utils to 64-bit versions from pure64? If s

Re: g77-3.4

2004-10-12 Thread Nicholas Materer
I was asked to forward this bug to Andreas Jochens. the amd64 and the i386 (filed a bug with debian) suffer from the Bugzilla Bug 17541 [g77] data statements with double precision constants fail The fix is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/f/Attic/bld.c.diff?r1=1.16.14.1&r2=1.1

Re: No dma for via82cxxx

2004-10-12 Thread Manwe Sulimo
Cierto día Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:38:09 -0300 alguien expulsó estas perlas: > > Also check /proc/ide/via. Hello I have the same problem on a Asus k8 se deluxe running a 32bit sarge. My ide hda and hdc (dvd recorder) have no dma. Mi 4 serial-ata disks do, but the ide one is the "system" one an

Re: Alsa not working in IA32 chroot

2004-10-12 Thread Koef
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 08:21:10PM +0200, Koef wrote: > I want to play WM9 movies on my pure64 box so I installed 32 bit mplayer > with w32 codecs in a sid-ia32 chroot. Video is fine, but sound via alsa is > not: Ok, I forgot to load snd-ioctl32. Please pardon my ignorance. -- Koef.

Re: No dma for via82cxxx

2004-10-12 Thread Peter Cordes
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 06:22:30PM +0200, Michael Wagener wrote: > So probably you should check your cables. Those 80pin IDE cables seem > somewhat unreliable to me. Try changing the cable with a new/unused one. Also check /proc/ide/via. -- #define X(x,y) x##y Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL

Re: which directory pure64 or gcc-3.4?

2004-10-12 Thread Michael Bienia
On 2004-10-11 12:53:34 -0700, Kristian G. Kvilekval wrote: > What is the status of the gcc-3.4 repository? > Is it in a usable state and how complete is it compared > to pure64? I use the gcc-3.4 archive for some weeks now without a problem. I don't know about the completeness of the archive com

Re: atomicity.h: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm'

2004-10-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:39:26PM -0700, Kristian G. Kvilekval wrote: > > While compiling on amd64 I got the following > error. > > /usr/include/c++/3.3/x86_64-linux/bits/atomicity.h:40: error: > inconsistent >operand constraints in an `asm' > > >From this bug report is appears to be fixed,

Re: atomicity.h: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm'

2004-10-12 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 04-Oct-11 14:39, Kristian G. Kvilekval wrote: > > While compiling on amd64 I got the following > error. > > /usr/include/c++/3.3/x86_64-linux/bits/atomicity.h:40: error: > inconsistent >operand constraints in an `asm' > > >From this bug report is appears to be fixed, > but I'm still getti

Re:X munged

2004-10-12 Thread William Hanwoody
try: chmod 1777 /tmp

Re: Plastik Theme in KDE

2004-10-12 Thread Sebastian Steinlechner
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 20:36, Andreas Richter wrote: > Hi, > > why there are no Plastik theme available in the KDE packages? > > Ok, not an issue with highest priority, but Plastik is very cool ;) Plastik _is_ available, otherwise I wouldn't be using it ;) Make sure you have the kdeartwork packag