I just uploaded a patched base-files_3.1.1.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb
to alioth.
yesterday evening I was trying to do a dist-upgrade but the base-files
package won't install. it says it's going to try to overwrite
/usr/X11R6/lib64 which is in xfree86-driver-synaptics package.
it was previously
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, John C. Martin wrote:
I have been running pure64 for a number of months now. After updating
yesterday I ran into a problem. Up to now the sk98lin did not have to be
explicitly listed in the /etc/modules file, but after the update and then a
reboot, the network was
On Thursday 16 December 2004 4:16 am, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
for some reason, autodiscovery (whether you run discover1 or discover2)
detected eth1394 before sk98lin, while previously it used to do the other
way around. As to why this is so, I have no idea. However, regardless of
why this
Lorenzo Milesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just uploaded a patched base-files_3.1.1.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb
to alioth.
yesterday evening I was trying to do a dist-upgrade but the base-files
package won't install. it says it's going to try to overwrite
/usr/X11R6/lib64 which is in
That would be a bug of xfree86-driver-synaptics and nvu. If we even
have a usr/X11R6/lib64 link then it belongs in the xfree86
package. The link in base-files is just a hack because it is easier to
patch.
should I open a bug for this on xfree86-driver-synaptics?
I tried removing the package,
Lorenzo Milesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would be a bug of xfree86-driver-synaptics and nvu. If we even
have a usr/X11R6/lib64 link then it belongs in the xfree86
package. The link in base-files is just a hack because it is easier to
patch.
should I open a bug for this on
Is there a version of RealPlayer that will run on AMD64 (as a plugin to
Firefox)?
If so, where can it be found?
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 17:56 +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
Is there a version of RealPlayer that will run on AMD64 (as a plugin to
Firefox)?
If so, where can it be found?
Have you asked Real? RealPlayer is non-DSFG.
You might try Helix Player, though.
--
Hi,
I am totally new to installing w/o downloadable bootable ISO cds. :-)
Can anyone point me to the docs to get started with this.
Do I have to install on a 32-bit machine, compile it and build my own
bootable CD for my AMD-64 system?
-- joaquin
bootable ISO's are availiable here.
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/
Jacob Bresciani
Network Administrator
ETraffic Solutions
BUS (250) 658-8238 ex 39
FAX (250) 658-5936
Joaquin Menchaca wrote:
Hi,
I am totally new to installing w/o downloadable bootable ISO cds. :-)
Can
Joaquin,
By all means, bootable CD's are available. You should start here:
http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html
In particular, the Chapter: Installing Debian GNU/Linux for amd64, discusses
the resources available to install AMD64.
Mike
On Thursday 16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joaquin Menchaca wrote:
| Is it possible to support Marvell Yukon 8001 gigabit NIC? Some mobos
| are using these, and so is my shuttle SN95G5 :-)
Have you tried the sk98lin module? You might want to check
Documentation/networking/sk98lin.txt
In trying to figure out what broke with Python exactly,
I've run across something I've never seen before on x86. I
currently have python2.3_2.3.4-18 installed on my system but
whenever I do 'apt-get source python2.3' it downloads
python2.3_2.3.4-16. Why isn't it grabbing -18?
Well, I'm not able to track down the exact problem, but
the python2.3_2.3.4-18_amd64.deb package currently available from
alioth is hosed. I attached my sources.list for reference.
Here's what I've tried so far. First I did 'apt-get
source python2.3' which as per my other recent
14 matches
Mail list logo
