On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 16:12 -0800, Joaquin Menchaca wrote:
> Where can one get a 64bit JVM?
You can get the 1.4.2 software from java.blackdown.org, or the 1.5.0
bits from java.sun.com.
Bill Broadley wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 02:36:18PM -0500, Brian Chase wrote:
Comments, updates?
I'm still hearing similar results, but don't forget AMD64's also
have compelling 32 bit performance. If the apps you want don't run
well in 64 bit environments then just install the 32-bit
Calvin Austin wrote:
My Dual AMD64 is my build machine of choice, I use it to run a 32bit
Java JVM which we then use to bootstrap a 64bit JVM build. Builds do a
lot of C/C++ and Java compilation so that really isn't a good
comparison to a terminal server but doesn't count as a specialist
applic
Hi!
>>> Check (lsmod) that you have usb_storage loaded.
>>
>>
>> I have it.
>> I can mount it, but only as usb1.1, not at full usb2 speed!
>
>
> Have you tried every USB jack?
Yes, he has:
>I tried all the five ports, all the same!
Ports=jacks (for example more or less also a false friend in German
Ayan Öztürk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi, i'm a new linux user using amd 64bit system. my question is when
> will debian linux will support officially this architecture. i think
> we can install i386 version now but does it work with same speed?
> thanks..
Current timeline is 2008 for Debian
Hi,
Has anyone had any luck running mythtv and with what card. Currently
using ivtv with random lockups under amd64, but i386 is stable. Using
latest ivtv driver and myth 0.16 debs recompiled for amd64.
Thanks,
Alan
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 07:52:06PM +0100, lore wrote:
> should I try 2.6.10? right now I'm using 2.6.9
Could you please try the 2.6.8 debian kernel package too?
Thanks
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
pgpgkKtbf7MJM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
My Dual AMD64 is my build machine of choice, I use it to run a 32bit
Java JVM which we then use to bootstrap a 64bit JVM build. Builds do a
lot of C/C++ and Java compilation so that really isn't a good comparison
to a terminal server but doesn't count as a specialist application, it
just does i
> That means that there is only one usb2.0 device (Spd=480) and that there
> are two devices on bus 01. You're sure that your device supports usb
> 2.0?
it should!
as I told you this morning, the asus datasheet says there should be
5xusb2 ports, and also right next to all the 5 ports there's a US
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 18:53 +0100, lore wrote:
> > Check (lsmod) that you have usb_storage loaded.
>
> I have it.
> I can mount it, but only as usb1.1, not at full usb2 speed!
Have you tried every USB jack?
--
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
J
That means that there is only one usb2.0 device (Spd=480) and that there
are two devices on bus 01. You're sure that your device supports usb
2.0?
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 14:29 +0100, Lorenzo Milesi wrote:
> > Try this command and post it to the list.
> > $ cat /proc/bus/usb/devices | grep ^T:
>
>
> Check (lsmod) that you have usb_storage loaded.
I have it.
I can mount it, but only as usb1.1, not at full usb2 speed!
Check (lsmod)
that you have usb_storage loaded.
--
br
Sven
Daniel van Eeden wrote:
Try this command and post it to the list.
$ cat /proc/bus/usb/devices | grep ^T:
Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Op ma, 20-12-2004 te 14:20 +0100, schreef Lorenzo Milesi:
Hi
I'm having some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
it will take at least until sarge (current testing platfrom) will be released.
For sure a i386 architecture will work, but there's also a very good running
unoffical port [1] out there.
[1] https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debi
hi, i'm a new linux user using amd 64bit system. my question is when
will debian linux will support officially this architecture. i think
we can install i386 version now but does it work with same speed?
thanks..
--
Ayan
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:05:24AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
> You are recomending using force-overwrite? That's just icky. :) I
> thought we got past package problems requiring that kind of brute force
> when potato was in the works.
This was only a temperary solution. There have been
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 01:59:08AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> If you're using the pure64 archive it's safe to use the
> --force-overwrite dpkg option to fix this:
> dpkg --force-overwrite -i
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-19.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb
>
> You'll also need to do this for t
It seems that the problem of executing /lib/libc.so.6 has been fixed.
> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1259: dl_main: \
> Assertion `_rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_prev->l_next
>==_rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_next' failed!
At lease on my machine (AMD Athlon64 runnin
> Try this command and post it to the list.
> $ cat /proc/bus/usb/devices | grep ^T:
# cat /proc/bus/usb/devices | grep ^T:
T: Bus=03 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=480 MxCh= 6
T: Bus=02 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=12 MxCh= 3
T: Bus=01 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 D
Try this command and post it to the list.
$ cat /proc/bus/usb/devices | grep ^T:
Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Op ma, 20-12-2004 te 14:20 +0100, schreef Lorenzo Milesi:
> Hi
>
> I'm having some problems with USB2.
> According to ASUS specs, my pc (A2526KUH) has 5xUSB2 ports.
> But lspci
Hi
I'm having some problems with USB2.
According to ASUS specs, my pc (A2526KUH) has 5xUSB2 ports.
But lspci says the following:
:00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 USB 1.1 (rev a5)
:00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 USB 1.1 (rev a5)
:00:02.2 USB Contr
Printing Works!!Thanks to whoever!!
Does anyone know if the printing system is working yet. Do I have to
reinstall the distrobution to get it?
23 matches
Mail list logo
