Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:14:31PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Something went wrong with the dependencies for libflac6 on amd64.
On i386 the package installs with no protests; in amd64 it requires
the uninstallation of kdemultimedia, jack, and lots of others. Could
the probl
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 07:55:10PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> About the xine-ui problem: What would you suggest to
> do? Should I file a bug against xine-ui?
I really doubt it's a bug in xine-ui so I see no point in filing
a bug for it.
Kurt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jochens wrote:
| On 05-Jan-08 17:06, Harald Dunkel wrote:
|
|>AFAIR the plan was to keep gcc 3.4.x at least till Sarge is
|>released. After release date the changes done for gcc-3.4
|>were supposed to be integrated into the Unstable tree.
|
|
|
On 05-Jan-08 17:06, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> AFAIR the plan was to keep gcc 3.4.x at least till Sarge is
> released. After release date the changes done for gcc-3.4
> were supposed to be integrated into the Unstable tree.
The amd64 porting team decided to stay with gcc-3.3 and to
integrate the pure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jochens wrote:
| On 05-Jan-07 23:17, Harald Dunkel wrote:
|
|>Why was the xine-ui rebuilt with gcc 4.0? Any problems?
|>The changelog doesn't indicate anything.
|
|
| The gcc-3.4 archive is currently being converted into a gcc-4.0 archive.
AFAIR
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:14:31PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
> Something went wrong with the dependencies for libflac6 on amd64.
> On i386 the package installs with no protests; in amd64 it requires
> the uninstallation of kdemultimedia, jack, and lots of others. Could
> the problem be vorbis-t
On Saturday 08 January 2005 06:14, David Liontooth wrote:
> Something went wrong with the dependencies for libflac6 on amd64.
> On i386 the package installs with no protests; in amd64 it requires
> the uninstallation of kdemultimedia, jack, and lots of others. Could
> the problem be vorbis-tools?
On 05-Jan-07 23:17, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Why was the xine-ui rebuilt with gcc 4.0? Any problems?
> The changelog doesn't indicate anything.
The gcc-3.4 archive is currently being converted into a gcc-4.0 archive.
Since a few weeks, every new package version has been built with gcc-4.0.
There we
8 matches
Mail list logo