Package: grub
Version: 0.95+cvs20040624-12
Severity: important
When using Linux 2.6.10, grub's 'install' command segfaults on new
hardware that has the NX bit available (e.g. AMD64, and I think also new
Pentium 4 systems). This turns out to be because:
* grub's Unix shell allocates a region of
On Saturday 05 February 2005 07:23, SpikeyGG wrote:
Theodore,
I tried what you suggested about making the symbolic link and it appears to
have half-way worked. Now when I kick off X it shows me the Nvidia logo
for a little while but then jumps back out (without reporting any errors to
Having until recently been using the stock 2.6.8-1-amd64-k8 kernel
(without problems), I decided to try and compile a new one myself.
Using the package for kernel-source-2.6.10 I compiled a monolithic
kernel with (I think) everything essential for boot compiled into the
kernel.
In this
* Gordon Ball ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto:
Having until recently been using the stock 2.6.8-1-amd64-k8 kernel
(without problems), I decided to try and compile a new one myself.
Using the package for kernel-source-2.6.10 I compiled a monolithic
kernel with (I think) everything essential
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:01:30 +0100, Filippo Carone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gordon Ball ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto:
Having until recently been using the stock 2.6.8-1-amd64-k8 kernel
(without problems), I decided to try and compile a new one myself.
Using the package for
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to make any difference. Are the kernel
options (root, real_root) unchanged in this version?
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:20:54 +, Gordon Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:01:30 +0100, Filippo Carone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gordon Ball ([EMAIL
Hi,
I'am running an amd64 laptop and I would like to build a kernel with
gcc-.34 like the kernel images avaible on the internet. Therefore, it
seems I can only build kernel with gcc-3.3. I did change some
variables in the kernel-source's Makefile and the environment
variables, but the resulting
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 21:22, Simon Edwards wrote:
It appears that libxf86config.a can't be used by shared libraries. It
doesn't appear to have been compiled correctly using the -fPIC compile
option.
I'm currently developing a util in Python that uses has a C extension which
uses
On Saturday 05 February 2005 23:03, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sebastian Kügler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 21:22, Simon Edwards wrote:
It appears that libxf86config.a can't be used by shared libraries. It
doesn't appear to have been compiled correctly using the
Sebastian Kügler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These are exactly identical files, hence the error from linking to either one
is the same.
miro.sebas(~): md5sum /usr/X11R6/lib/libxf86config*.a
27db885b4c292588c6c55ae951c85132 /usr/X11R6/lib/libxf86config.a
27db885b4c292588c6c55ae951c85132
Kurt Roeckx wrote on 03/02/2005 18:24:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
From what I heart you won't feel the difference. The advantage of a
64bit kernel lies in having more than 3GB address space (more than 4GB
for 64bit) programs and the possibility of more
The Gigabyte GA-K8VNXP has a VIA rhine LAN adapter as well as the r8169
shown in the table (2 ports).
Also it has via82xx audio that isn't shown in the table.
--
Shawn D'Alimonte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
I guess other people might be interested in this too.
Kurt
---BeginMessage---
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:24:26AM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote on 03/02/2005 18:24:
Actually, you can use 4GB of address space for userspace.
For 32bit userspace or also for 64bit userspace?
Sven Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or in other words: With a 64bit (amd64) kernel, where are the actual
limits for:
32bit Apps
~4 GiB
64bit Apps
17179869184 GiB theoretically
~262144 GiB on current CPUs (- a few GiB the kernel reserves)
Thanks,
Sven
MfG
Goswin
--
To
14 matches
Mail list logo
