Adam Skutt wrote:
Javier Kohen wrote:
is anybody using gamin on AMD64? Do you have any success stories to
share?
Yes, I have to use it because famd utterly hangs on CIFS mounts (which I
have to use because SMBFS is broken in 2.6 and ...)
It doesn't eat all my CPU or go into interruptable sleep f
Dustin N.Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just on a bit of a side note... If one wants to upgrade the amd64-k8
> kernel (i.e. from the default 2.6.8-10 to 2.6.10), would the sources
> from www.kernel.org suffice, or is there a different place to acquire
> the amd64-k8 kernel? I much prefer d
Philippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi,
> just a little bug
> In debian amd64 mime type for iso file is x-arc instead of iso as in
> debian i386, so you can't right click and burn it in nautilus
>
> regards
Where is that? On http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/?
MfG
Goswin
--
To
"Toshikazu Aiyama, Ph.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- Goswin wrote
>
>> That would be the initrd and not the 2nd stage. Most likely the initrd
>> is missing the right module for your sata controler. Check the
>> contents or just try adding the right module in /etc/mkinitrd/modules
>> before
On 05-Feb-12 14:04, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Andreas Jochens wrote:
> >I will fix this by uploading new versions of the gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0
> >packages soon.
> >
> >I cannot correct this just now because alioth is down at the moment.
> >
>
> Any news about this?
This has finally been fixed, i.e. so
the owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin wrote:
>
>> So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
>> point apt to:
>> deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main
>> contrib non-free
>
> This time I used this image:
> sarge-amd64-netinst
the owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin wrote:
>
>>> I used the above sources.list with this image:
>>> sid-amd64-netinst.iso11-Feb-2005 09:01 193M Maybe that is the
>>> wrong image to test the debian-pure64 testing. After reboot the
>>> base config did not allow manual package select
Hola Jaime,
> 1.- The fglrx driver provided by ATI work with other Non-ATI with
> RADEON chipset?
According to the log your chipset is supported by the driver, but you
can always ask the manufacturer of your card to confirm that.
Jaime Ochoa Malagón wrote:
Hi,
I'll apreciate the help you can prov
Vanuxem Grégory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry, I've tested sarge image (01/15).
>
> I will try sid image; does it contain 2.6.* kernel ?
>
> Cheers, Greg
Is there any other kind? :)
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Hi,
I'll apreciate the help you can provide.
1.- The fglrx driver provided by ATI work with other Non-ATI with
RADEON chipset?
2.- If the answer is YES then why I can´t see anything?
a) I´d already follow the step from Flavio's page
b) Success to compile the module and load
c) X don't comp
Chris Wakefield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Alessandro,
>
> I've had the same problem for months. I just keep killing the artsd pid, and
> it's ok for a few hours or so.
>
> I've recompiled several new kernels and still the same problem pops up.
>
> I'm running pure64 as well with kernel 2.
Goswin wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh
install, can point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64
testing main contrib non-free
This time I used this image:
sarge-amd64-netinst.iso 15-Jan-2005 17:38 125M
The installer from 15 January
Hi,
is anybody using gamin on AMD64? Do you have any success stories to share?
I've installed it but Nautilus doesn't seem to notice it at all. It
doesn't matter whether I start it manually (and also restart Nautilus)
or let libgamin start it automatically (which never happens, actually).
I'm us
Goswin wrote:
I used the above sources.list with this image:
sid-amd64-netinst.iso11-Feb-2005 09:01 193M Maybe that is the
wrong image to test the debian-pure64 testing. After reboot the
base config did not allow manual package selection.
I tried again and base config failed again on file se
Hello,
I get this behaviour too ! After some time I get the "abnormal status"
messages and the disk is dead until reboot. pure64 is installed on a
pata drive (the sata is almost unusable).
nforce 250Gb (sata_nv) + seagate 200 G (dont have the model number
handy)
I tried the 2.6.10 kernel from p
Dustin N.Jenkins wrote:
Just on a bit of a side note... If one wants to upgrade the amd64-k8
kernel (i.e. from the default 2.6.8-10 to 2.6.10), would the sources
from www.kernel.org suffice, or is there a different place to acquire
the amd64-k8 kernel? I much prefer downloading the source an
Just on a bit of a side note... If one wants to upgrade the amd64-k8
kernel (i.e. from the default 2.6.8-10 to 2.6.10), would the sources
from www.kernel.org suffice, or is there a different place to acquire
the amd64-k8 kernel? I much prefer downloading the source and
rebuilding myself, b
I did take a shot at it.
But after some hacking and gdbing, I gave in because of lack of time.
The code in lineakd is sverely broken, and it is a miracle that it works on
i386.
The errors is mostly when reading the config-file(s).
In functions where stripping spaces and control chars are done, the
Hi,
I think there is a bug in php4-recode on amd64 :
(files attached)
$ /usr/bin/php4 -c php.ini -q ./recode.php
Erreur de segmentation (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]
$ gdb -c core /usr/bin/php4
GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by
I was wondering the samething. I had it working under SuSE 9.1, but
when I went to Debian 64 I was at a loss. I decided to go with
Hotkeys. if you want some information on how i got that up and running
just let me know I have the process somewhat documented. I think that
hotkeys might just be a pa
hi,
just a little bug
In debian amd64 mime type for iso file is x-arc instead of iso as in
debian i386, so you can't right click and burn it in nautilus
regards
--
Philippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
--- Goswin wrote
> That would be the initrd and not the 2nd stage. Most likely the initrd
> is missing the right module for your sata controler. Check the
> contents or just try adding the right module in /etc/mkinitrd/modules
> before creating the initrd.
I also thought initrd is the problem. B
the owner wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the installation, can DFS be used to install amd64-sarge?
I tried this last year using the same images from October.
The DFS takes more expertise to use than the Debian Installer.
The DFS boots into ram like a LiveCD unless you tell the kernel
to b
Sorry, I've tested sarge image (01/15).
I will try sid image; does it contain 2.6.* kernel ?
Cheers, Greg
-Message d'origine-
De : Goswin von Brederlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : samedi 12 février 2005 19:14
À : debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Objet : Re: netinstal
Vanuxem Grégory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> About actual netinstall, there is problem with insertion of modules.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For my first installation attempt I used the 125MB netinst iso (2005-01-24 I
> think). Installation worked quite fine with that one exception th
I installed to an Asus K8V-X about a month ago; everything went smoothly.
Processor seems to be an Athlon 3400; dmesg suggests 2202.895 MHz
I don't think I've heard any sound from it yet; probably related to a reported
timeout whist reading the AC97 codec and the logs filling with
"via_audio: ig
Hi,
About actual netinstall, there is problem with insertion of modules.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For my first installation attempt I used the 125MB netinst iso (2005-01-24 I
think). Installation worked quite fine with that one exception that it had
no networking modules and no support for [reise
On Saturday, 12 February 2005 08:49, v0n0 wrote:
> After installing libflash-mozplugin + dependancies when I get in a
> site with a Flash component Firefox (1.0) goes in segmentation fault.
> Is there anyone that is experiencing the same problem?
I used to maintain libflash (I adopting it thinking
Erik Mouw wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 02:45:18AM +0100, Manuele Rampazzo wrote:
I'm using an updated sid pure64 and I've got some troubles with my sata
disks, but I'm not sure if the problem is in the hardware (in disks or
maybe in the controller) or in the software...
What kernel, what SATA
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 02:45:18AM +0100, Manuele Rampazzo wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I'm using an updated sid pure64 and I've got some troubles with my sata
> disks, but I'm not sure if the problem is in the hardware (in disks or
> maybe in the controller) or in the software... Maybe you can gi
After installing libflash-mozplugin + dependancies when I get in a site
with a Flash component Firefox (1.0) goes in segmentation fault. Is
there anyone that is experiencing the same problem?
--
Alessandro Dal Grande
Student In The University Of Padua - Computer Science
Linux Registered User #35
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:45:23PM +0100, Thorsten Buss wrote:
Someone without Problems, and a Solution ?
Hm, noone? Is nobody with an AMD64 using lineakd? Strange.
How could I help debugging the problem?
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
| Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PR
Hello,
I maintain a very small utility called "linuxinfo". After installing
my new amd64 machine I noticed that it did not support this machine,
so I am sorting this out in a new upload. To get as many AMD64
machines as possible supported, I'd like to ask anyone with a few
seconds to spare to insta
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Jaime Ochoa Malagón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
I succed installing Pure64 in my new box, but the installer gave me a
scare, the bug is so simple:
I used to have in my HD
hda1 XP (NTFS)
hda2 Debian (ext3) (sid/32)
hda3 Swap
...
I decided to overwrite hda1 and us
Andreas Jochens wrote:
I made a mistake and built the latest gcc-3.4 source package so that
the libgcc1 and libstdc++6 binary packages were created. This is wrong
because these binary pacakges are also create by the gcc-4.0 source
package.
I will fix this by uploading new versions of the gcc-3.4 an
"Toshikazu Aiyama, Ph.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My PC's basic configuration is as follows:
>CPU: Athlon64 3200+
>M/B: Asus A8N SLI Deluxe
>Memory: 4 x Samsung 512MB
>Video: 2 x Asus EN6600GT
>PATA: hda: Maxtor 6Y160PO
> hdc: Matshita DVD-RAM SW-9573S
>
Jaime Ochoa Malagón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I succed installing Pure64 in my new box, but the installer gave me a
> scare, the bug is so simple:
>
> I used to have in my HD
>
> hda1 XP (NTFS)
> hda2 Debian (ext3) (sid/32)
> hda3 Swap
> ...
>
> I decided to overwrite hda1 and using t
the owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin wrote:
>
>> So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
>> point apt to:
>> deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main
>> contrib non-free
>
> OK. I remember some things from my first install so now I c
Jean-Luc wrote
> Sure you didnt forget the initrd somewhere?
I did not. As you can find in this ML, sid has some difficulty handling
SATA disk. But I must repeat comparable sarge installation did not fail.
And also I must stress, comparable sid installation to PATA did not fail.
Toshikazu Aiya
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:01:31AM +0100, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
> Bug report on amd64: for some time, I had been puzzled by the
> postinst of all gstreamer0.8 output plugins segfaulting, namely
> gst-compprep-0.8 would segfault.
> After getting sick at it, since my system works otherwi
Le 12.02.2005 09:00:29, Toshikazu Aiyama, Ph.D. a écrit :
My PC's basic configuration is as follows:
CPU: Athlon64 3200+
M/B: Asus A8N SLI Deluxe
Memory: 4 x Samsung 512MB
Video: 2 x Asus EN6600GT
PATA: hda: Maxtor 6Y160PO
hdc: Matshita DVD-RAM SW-9573S
hdd: Yamaha CRW-F1E
My PC's basic configuration is as follows:
CPU: Athlon64 3200+
M/B: Asus A8N SLI Deluxe
Memory: 4 x Samsung 512MB
Video: 2 x Asus EN6600GT
PATA: hda: Maxtor 6Y160PO
hdc: Matshita DVD-RAM SW-9573S
hdd: Yamaha CRW-F1E
SATA: sda: Seagate ST3160B27AS
sdb: Se
42 matches
Mail list logo
