Re: gpm problems

2005-02-21 Thread the owner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not only gpm doesn't start at boot time, but after a while, randomly, it completely freezes the machine once activated. It happens with every kernel 2.6.x I tried since my first pure64 installation. I'm quite sure that gpm is the culprit as since I removed it my system is p

Re: Re: Re: fglrx, I should ask...

2005-02-21 Thread the owner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm still using Xfree86 and finally I got 2K fps, that's really pretty amazing now, but I have a trouble with the images, I just test with the screen savers and many of them work very fast but the image is corrupt, I see only pieces in the Bubble 3D GL, is like just p

Re: Doomsday with 32bit Chroot, what now?

2005-02-21 Thread Greg Grotsky
Thanks so very much for that information about the home directories and the tmp and the super-script. I have implemented it all and it works like a charm!! YAY I can play doom! Very helpful post. It's too bad you can't make that one a sticky! -Greg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Re: fglrx, I should ask...

2005-02-21 Thread Jaime Ochoa Malagón
Hi, I'm still using Xfree86 and finally I got 2K fps, that's really pretty amazing now, but I have a trouble with the images, I just test with the screen savers and many of them work very fast but the image is corrupt, I see only pieces in the Bubble 3D GL, is like just parts of the frame could b

Re: Doomsday with 32bit Chroot, what now?

2005-02-21 Thread Theodore Kisner
On Monday 21 February 2005 18:27, Greg Grotsky wrote: > installed (in my chroot) I can't figure out how to run it. No matter if I > try to redirect the display to :0.0 or not deng doesn't work. It gives me > the following: Do you have /tmp and your home directory bind mounted in the chroot? Sor

Re: Unknown Devices in lspci

2005-02-21 Thread Greg Grotsky
That 'update-pciids' is a pretty sweet piece of code. Thanks for that, it worked like a charm! Now it reads: :00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce3 250Gb Host Bridge (rev a1) :00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e0 (rev a2) :00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corpo

Doomsday with 32bit Chroot, what now?

2005-02-21 Thread Greg Grotsky
Hi guys, I'm an old gamer and I like my doom. Unfortunately, deng 1.8.6 isn't 64 bit compatible yet. So, I've got my 32bit chroot installed and I downloaded deng, I was able to compile deng in the 32bit chroot while I couldn't get it compiled in 64-bit. However, now that it's compiled and ins

Re: running openoffice from chroot

2005-02-21 Thread Clive Menzies
On (22/02/05 00:07), Alexandru Cabuz wrote: > Hello, > > I just set up my system according to the amd64 howto, and I even set > up kde to recognize doc and sxw files and open them with openoffice. > > The problem is that files that have spaces in them do not get opened. > The first word is consid

Re: running openoffice from chroot

2005-02-21 Thread Theodore Kisner
On Monday 21 February 2005 15:07, Alexandru Cabuz wrote: > The problem is that files that have spaces in them do not get opened. > The first word is considered as a filename, then the second word as > another filename... I'm assuming you are using dchroot to run openoffice in the chroot? For exa

Re: can't get libc6-dev

2005-02-21 Thread clement
i run dpkg --force-all -i libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_amd64.deb and reinstall bash and base-files and everything goes well now, i've got libc6-dev :) thanx, clement Le mardi 22 février 2005 à 02:28 +0100, kastor grog a écrit : > argh ! it fails. > this downgrade remove packages base-files and bash... >

request Sarge information into HOWTO

2005-02-21 Thread Kyuu Eturautti
Could someone please add basic Sarge information to the howto documentation on Alioth. Basically, the mirror list (are there any yet?) and acceptable sources.list entries would suffice. This would just seem like a faster way of finding the information instead of digging the list archives. I pl

Re: can't get libc6-dev

2005-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
kastor grog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > argh ! it fails. > this downgrade remove packages base-files and bash... > Should i use any option to force libc6 installation ? Downgrade base-files instead of removing it. As for bash, why would it remove it? > thanks clement > > # dpkg -i libc6_2.3

Re: can't get libc6-dev

2005-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > clement wrote on 22/02/2005 00:24: >> i'm pretty new to this list (and in debian 64 world !), but when i try >> to install libc6-dev i've got an error (translation) : Following >> packages have unmet dependencies : >> libc6-dev: Dépend: libc6 (= 2.3.2.d

Re: can't get libc6-dev

2005-02-21 Thread kastor grog
argh ! it fails. this downgrade remove packages base-files and bash... Should i use any option to force libc6 installation ? thanks clement # dpkg -i libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_amd64.deb (Lecture de la base de données... 65339 fichiers et répertoires déjà installés.) Préparation du remplacement de libc

Re: can't get libc6-dev

2005-02-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 12:24:00AM +0100, clement wrote: > hi all, > > libc6-dev: Dépend: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20) but > 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 should be installed Run: apt-get install libc6=2.3.2.ds1-20 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Re: can't get libc6-dev

2005-02-21 Thread Sven Mueller
clement wrote on 22/02/2005 00:24: i'm pretty new to this list (and in debian 64 world !), but when i try to install libc6-dev i've got an error (translation) : Following packages have unmet dependencies : libc6-dev: Dépend: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20) but 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 should be installe

Re: Multiarch distribution

2005-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
David Hartveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > I was wondering wether a multiarch distribution is already (partially) > available. I'm interested in testing/toying around with this. I read > that at least some packages already support this. Could anyone tell > me anything about this?

Re: can't get libc6-dev

2005-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
clement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi all, > > i'm pretty new to this list (and in debian 64 world !), but when i try > to install libc6-dev i've got an error (translation) : > Following packages have unmet dependencies : > libc6-dev: Dépend: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20) but > 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.p

Re: can't get libc6-dev

2005-02-21 Thread clement
here is my sources.list, nothing bad isn't it ? #offcial deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sid main contrib non-free #official #deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable/amd64/ #mirror official europe deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/pure64 sid main contrib non

running openoffice from chroot

2005-02-21 Thread Alexandru Cabuz
Hello, I just set up my system according to the amd64 howto, and I even set up kde to recognize doc and sxw files and open them with openoffice. The problem is that files that have spaces in them do not get opened. The first word is considered as a filename, then the second word as another filena

Multiarch distribution

2005-02-21 Thread David Hartveld
Hi all, I was wondering wether a multiarch distribution is already (partially) available. I'm interested in testing/toying around with this. I read that at least some packages already support this. Could anyone tell me anything about this? I found a multiarch directory on debian-amd64.aliot

Re: The future of the gcc-3.4 archive / Name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' Reply-To:

2005-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Good evening Kurt, > > On 05-Feb-21 19:43, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:37:34PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote: >> > >> > Hopefully, the name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' will not cause too >> > much trouble for mirrors and curre

Re: can't get libc6-dev

2005-02-21 Thread Javier Kohen
Ça va Clement, it doesn't look to me like you're installing libc6-dev from the pure64 archive. You should verify that your apt sources.list is setup correctly to use the same archive that you used for the rest of the system. Are you by any chance trying to install a 32-bit libc6-dev? If you want

can't get libc6-dev

2005-02-21 Thread clement
hi all, i'm pretty new to this list (and in debian 64 world !), but when i try to install libc6-dev i've got an error (translation) : Following packages have unmet dependencies : libc6-dev: Dépend: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20) but 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 should be installed but i can't find the men

Re: xserver not working

2005-02-21 Thread Lakatos György
Hi, I have a similar ATI card with the same chipset. I switched framebuffer device interface off because it broke the text console, and I use the 'radeon' instead of the 'ati' driver. Here's the 'Device' section of my XF86Config: Section "Device" Identifier "Generic Vi

Re: Reportbug crash in gcc-3.4

2005-02-21 Thread Javier Kohen
Forget it, I spoke too soon. Apparently voting for bugs on GCC is not allowed. Still, the bug report is there if anybody wants to track it. Thanks, Javier Kohen wrote: Hi, Anybody who is concerned about Python/Reportbug not working correctly on the gcc-3.4/4.0 archive might want to vote for this

Re: Reportbug crash in gcc-3.4

2005-02-21 Thread Javier Kohen
Hi, Anybody who is concerned about Python/Reportbug not working correctly on the gcc-3.4/4.0 archive might want to vote for this bug on GCC's Bugzilla: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20126 . Thanks, Javier Kohen wrote: Hi, I kind of found the problem. It seems to me that GCC is gene

Re: xserver not working

2005-02-21 Thread mtms
On 21 Feb 2005, 20:02, Dr Gavin Seddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (II) FBDEV: driver for framebuffer: fbdev > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:00:0 > (II) Loading sub module "fbdevhw" > (II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libfbdevhw.a > (II) Module fbdevhw: vendo

Re: xserver not working

2005-02-21 Thread Javier Kohen
Besides the missing font Jérôme posted about, the card is not being recognized by the X server. Are you sure you are using the ati/radeon driver (and that it's compatible with your card)? You can also try ATI's official drivers. I heard that also x.org's X server supports newer ATI cards than t

Re: xserver not working

2005-02-21 Thread Jérôme Grin
Hi i've just create an account and this is the first mail i received. I'm new in Linux World so my advices may be unuseful. But it seems you have no font installed. Maybe you can try $ apt-get install xfonts-base or $ apt-get install xserver-common Tell me if it helps Thanx On Mon, 21 Feb 2

xserver not working

2005-02-21 Thread Dr Gavin Seddon
Hi, I copied over the XF86Config-4 file from amd64 Knoppix, which had a display. I have installed the Xserver but, I cannot startx. from 'lspci' the ATI graphics is unknown. What do I do to fix this, pls? Attached is my XFree86.0.log. Thanks gs. XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 20

Re: graphviz 2.2 dot command in gcc-3.4 archive aborts

2005-02-21 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 05-Feb-21 14:04, Per Bojsen wrote: > BTW, a question for Andreas: Are we reporting the GCC 4.0 bugs > upstream? Are the GCC 4.0 developers OK with reports like the above > or do they require narrowing down of the problem to a single source > file or function (which might be time consuming for a

Re: The future of the gcc-3.4 archive / Name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' Reply-To:

2005-02-21 Thread Andreas Jochens
Guten Abend Goswin, On 05-Feb-21 19:59, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > I'm going to contact all mirrors shortly with an update of the new > archive structure and mirror suggestions / sample scripts. > > Should I set a date for the namechange, say a week after I send that > mail, and then "mv gcc-3

Re: The future of the gcc-3.4 archive / Name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' Reply-To:

2005-02-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:58:12PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > If nobody else comes up with a different proposal and > no other problems occur, I would like to change the > name on 2005-03-15 (three weeks from now). An exact hour would be nice too. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

graphviz 2.2 dot command in gcc-3.4 archive aborts

2005-02-21 Thread Per Bojsen
Hi, the `dot' command from the graphviz 2.2 package in the gcc-3.4 archive aborts when run. All I get is this message: Aborted strace did not reveal much useful information. I got the source package intending to gdb this failure but quickly discovered that the abort is apparently due to anot

Re: The future of the gcc-3.4 archive / Name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' Reply-To:

2005-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hopefully, the name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' will not cause too > much trouble for mirrors and current users. For some time the old name > 'gcc-3.4' should be still available as a symlink to 'gcc4'. > > Regards > Andreas Jochens I'm going to

Re: The future of the gcc-3.4 archive / Name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' Reply-To:

2005-02-21 Thread Andreas Jochens
Good evening Kurt, On 05-Feb-21 19:43, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:37:34PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > > > Hopefully, the name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' will not cause too > > much trouble for mirrors and current users. For some time the old name > > 'gcc-3.4' sh

Re: allocation failures

2005-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Which bugs are causing these allocation failures? > Notice that cups and pdflush are both handling pdf's. > setiathome is version 3.08 > > $ dmesg | grep "allocation failure" > setiathome: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20 > setiathome: page

Re: What will happen when sarge becomes officially stable?

2005-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote on 21/02/2005 17:48: >> We plan to release an inofficial sarge-amd64 shortly after sarge >> (allow for a final sync and check that everything is fine, create CDs, >> DVDs, ...). > > Great. I don't mind it being released a bit la

Re: The future of the gcc-3.4 archive / Name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' Reply-To:

2005-02-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:37:34PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > Hopefully, the name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' will not cause too > much trouble for mirrors and current users. For some time the old name > 'gcc-3.4' should be still available as a symlink to 'gcc4'. If you can give us a

Re: allocation failures

2005-02-21 Thread Javier Kohen
Hi Daniel, What archive are you using? Daniel van Eeden wrote: Which bugs are causing these allocation failures? Notice that cups and pdflush are both handling pdf's. For your information, pdflush is a kernel process which has nothing to do with PDFs. What architecture was [EMAIL PROTECTED] build

The future of the gcc-3.4 archive / Name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' Reply-To:

2005-02-21 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 05-Feb-21 17:48, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > What happens to the gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0 repository is totaly undecided and > I leave that up to Andreas as he is doing all the work on it. My intention is to continue the gcc-3.4 archive until Debian officially switches to gcc-4.0 as its default compi

allocation failures

2005-02-21 Thread Daniel van Eeden
Which bugs are causing these allocation failures? Notice that cups and pdflush are both handling pdf's. setiathome is version 3.08 $ dmesg | grep "allocation failure" setiathome: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20 setiathome: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20 setiathome: page al

Re: What will happen when sarge becomes officially stable?

2005-02-21 Thread Sven Mueller
Goswin von Brederlow wrote on 21/02/2005 17:48: We plan to release an inofficial sarge-amd64 shortly after sarge (allow for a final sync and check that everything is fine, create CDs, DVDs, ...). Great. I don't mind it being released a bit later than the official sarge. Obviously it would be grea

Re: un! What will happen when sarge becomes officially stable?

2005-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi. > > I have seen various diverging infos about what will happen to the > AMD64 ports once Sarge becomes stable. So to have some more background > on a few decisions (mostly for home use) I have to make: > > What will happen to the two AMD64 ports (pure

Re: sources.list ftp site

2005-02-21 Thread Jacob Larsen
Dr Gavin Seddon wrote: Hi, What are good ftp sites to enter into my sources.list? The ones I found on the www don't work. Thanks, gs Using sid Oops. Must remember to reply to the list: This one also has gcc-3.4: deb http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/gcc-3.4 sid main contrib non-free deb-src http://bach.hpc

Re: sources.list ftp site

2005-02-21 Thread Dr Gavin Seddon
Bingo! Thanks. gs On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 13:58 +, Clive Menzies wrote: > On (21/02/05 12:26), Dr Gavin Seddon wrote: > > To: amd64list > > From: Dr Gavin Seddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:26:09 + > > Subject: sources.list ftp site > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

un! What will happen when sarge becomes officially stable?

2005-02-21 Thread Sven Mueller
Hi. I have seen various diverging infos about what will happen to the AMD64 ports once Sarge becomes stable. So to have some more background on a few decisions (mostly for home use) I have to make: What will happen to the two AMD64 ports (pure-64 and gcc3.4) once Sarge becomes stable? Will the

Re: dist-upgrade

2005-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Markus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > is there any problem to make a dist-upgrade at this moment, for an > installation from dezember 2004? > I don´t want to destroy my well configured and busy server. > thanks for any answer. > > markus Likely. That is in the problem zone I thin

Re: sources.list ftp site

2005-02-21 Thread Clive Menzies
On (21/02/05 12:26), Dr Gavin Seddon wrote: > To: amd64list > From: Dr Gavin Seddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:26:09 + > Subject: sources.list ftp site > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > What are good ftp sites to enter into my sources.list? The ones I found > on th

dist-upgrade

2005-02-21 Thread Markus Brinkmann
Hi, is there any problem to make a dist-upgrade at this moment, for an installation from dezember 2004? I donÂt want to destroy my well configured and busy server. thanks for any answer. markus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

sources.list ftp site

2005-02-21 Thread Dr Gavin Seddon
Hi, What are good ftp sites to enter into my sources.list? The ones I found on the www don't work. Thanks, gs Using sid -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New netinst iso

2005-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Dmitry Derjavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Feb 19 2005 at 19:18, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> D-I defaults to use sarge and complains if not found. For that >> reason even the sid CDs use sarge. I also added links for testing, >> sid, unstable to cover all bases. > > Just to be clea

gpm problems

2005-02-21 Thread mtms
Not only gpm doesn't start at boot time, but after a while, randomly, it completely freezes the machine once activated. It happens with every kernel 2.6.x I tried since my first pure64 installation. I'm quite sure that gpm is the culprit as since I removed it my system is pretty stable. It doesn'

Re: New netinst iso

2005-02-21 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2005-02-21 11:42:39, schrieb Dmitry Derjavin: > Just to be clear: > > 1. If installed from sid-amd64-netinst.iso (apt is pointed to testing) >-- is it sarge or sid? The curent amd64 is SID, SARGE, TESTION and UNSTABLE After the release of SARGE (without amd64) the amd64 Architekture has