Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The proposed solution involves overriding parts of the system with
> 32-bit libraries and binaries.
>
> Debian cleanly supports 32-bit libraries (see package ia32-libs), but
> not binaries. You can still make a chroot jail and run the browser
Sure it doe
Le dimanche 27 février 2005 à 13:22 -0500, Javier Kohen a écrit :
> Doesn't your e-mail client have a "Reply [to] all" feature?
Far better: a "Reply to list" which only replies to the mailing-list,
and nor bothers the sender more, nor forces you to cut and paste
addresses between boxes.
> Erik Nor
Let me see... well, apt-get install mplayer-386 seems to work here (I
don't have it installed and it has to pull 41 packages here, but it
doesn't report failed dependencies). Did apt-get update work alright?
What about issuing apt-cache policy aalib1? Here it returns:
aalib1:
Installed: (none)
What could be the problem?
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
mplayer-386: Depends: aalib1 (>= 1.2) but it is not installable
Depends: libartsc0 (>= 1.3.2) but it is not installable
Depends: libasoun
The Alioth documentation says that it's only available via an IA32
chroot for now ->
https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html
Dustin
Wolfgang Mader wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 27 February 2005 21:30, Erik Norman wrote:
Hell
Erik Norman wrote:
Hello!
I am slowly setting up the chroot environment for 32bit applications.
The only thing I get mad about is a good source.list for apt-get.
I have looked up apt-get.org and debian.org and googled somewhat, but I
am not happy yet.
Is it possibile that somebody could mail me his
Hello!
I am slowly setting up the chroot environment for 32bit applications.
The only thing I get mad about is a good source.list for apt-get.
I have looked up apt-get.org and debian.org and googled somewhat, but I
am not happy yet.
Is it possibile that somebody could mail me his/her source.list
The proposed solution involves overriding parts of the system with
32-bit libraries and binaries.
Debian cleanly supports 32-bit libraries (see package ia32-libs), but
not binaries. You can still make a chroot jail and run the browser from
there, as suggested in the How To. Unless you're really
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ernest jw ter Kuile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:48:47 +0100
Subject: 32bit plugins for 64bit konqueror
To: Karol Krizka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sunday 27 February 2005 20:46, Karol Krizka wrote:
>
> I think I have read on this list th
On 20:17, Sun 27 Feb 05, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 07:12:52PM +, Erik Norman wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I want to suggest to change/add an answer to
> > debian-amd64@lists.debian.org, instead of being forced to add it myself
> > everytime. It has already happened that I have
well, what to do to get javaplugin for mozilla(-firefox) running?
Erik
On Son, 2005-02-27 at 21:26 +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Anders Helmersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 10:04:21 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> >> The plugin seems to work, but now when I start m
Anders Helmersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 10:04:21 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
>> The plugin seems to work, but now when I start mozilla, I get the
>> following:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins$ mozilla grep: error while
>> loading shared libraries: libc
Erik Norman wrote:
Hello,
I have tried several times (using the "install missing plugins" feauture
of mozilla-firefox) to install flashplayer, no way.
It does not work.
Any hint?
There is no flash player for amd64. From
http://sluglug.ucsc.edu/macromedia/faq.html:
*10. Where is Flash for P
I have sent a complaint about a missing plugin.
well the site does not respond any longer.
Erik
On Son, 2005-02-27 at 14:42 -0500, Peter Nelson wrote:
> Erik Norman wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >I have tried several times (using the "install missing plugins" feauture
> >of mozilla-firefox) to instal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 27 February 2005 21:30, Erik Norman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have tried several times (using the "install missing plugins" feauture
> of mozilla-firefox) to install flashplayer, no way.
> It does not work.
>
> Any hint?
>
> apt-get flashplayer g
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:30:35 +, Erik Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have tried several times (using the "install missing plugins" feauture
> of mozilla-firefox) to install flashplayer, no way.
> It does not work.
>
> Any hint?
I think I have read on this list that konqueror
Hi Erik,
Erik Norman wrote:
Hello,
I have tried several times (using the "install missing plugins" feauture
of mozilla-firefox) to install flashplayer, no way.
It does not work.
Any hint?
apt-get flashplayer gives no result
Maybe because there is no such thing as a Macromedia Flashplayer for
AMD64
Hello,
I have tried several times (using the "install missing plugins" feauture
of mozilla-firefox) to install flashplayer, no way.
It does not work.
Any hint?
apt-get flashplayer gives no result
Erik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Well, I still can't figure out the path but it seems the Bluej.org
software that I use, when extracted and installed automatically
figured out where Java is and it works great with Bluej. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 07:12:52PM +, Erik Norman wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I want to suggest to change/add an answer to
> debian-amd64@lists.debian.org, instead of being forced to add it myself
> everytime. It has already happened that I have answered just to who
> wrote the mail, not to the mailin
Yes, it has.
It is just a habit to click on reply, and as I wrote, other mailing
lists I am into, have this reply (without reply to all) feature.
It was just a suggestion :)
Erik
On Son, 2005-02-27 at 13:22 -0500, Javier Kohen wrote:
> Doesn't your e-mail client have a "Reply [to] all" feature?
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 10:04:21 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> The plugin seems to work, but now when I start mozilla, I get the following:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins$ mozilla
> grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared
> object file: No such file
Doesn't your e-mail client have a "Reply [to] all" feature?
Erik Norman wrote:
Hello!
I want to suggest to change/add an answer to
debian-amd64@lists.debian.org, instead of being forced to add it myself
everytime. It has already happened that I have answered just to who
wrote the mail, not to the m
Hallo,
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Beware because debugging is broken with Blackdown's JDK 1.4.2_01 on
AMD64. It's been reported several times in their BTS, but there's
been no answer so far (at least on the BTS; I haven't checked their
mailing list, if they h
Hello!
I want to suggest to change/add an answer to
debian-amd64@lists.debian.org, instead of being forced to add it myself
everytime. It has already happened that I have answered just to who
wrote the mail, not to the mailing list.
I am into other mailing lists as well, they ALL have this "featu
Dunno,
I am installing it for the first time with apt-get today.
I have always installed the "normal" way, making the symbolic link
directly from the java /jdk/plugin/.. to mozilla folder..
On Son, 2005-02-27 at 10:04 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> You can add this line to your /etc/apt/sources
You can add this line to your /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/debian sid non-free
Then, just "apt-get update ; apt-get install j2re1.4 equivs"
FWIW, I did this just earlier today on my pure64/sid system. I only loaded
the j2re1.4 package and then updated the
/etc/altern
I don't really get the right mirror location into my source list of apt.
could you please just paste that entry of your apt source list into a
mail and send it?
Erik
On Sam, 2005-02-26 at 22:06 -0600, Juan A wrote:
> www.blackdown.com
>
> look for a mirror, add it to your sources.list, check yo
jmt wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile QT4 (beta) on a debian amd64, kernel 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8.
Very surprisingly, compilation aborts when trying to build a shared library,
while succeeds with a static build.
Has anyone ever met this kind of situation ?
Maybe you have to create a symbolic link for /us
Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Beware because debugging is broken with Blackdown's JDK 1.4.2_01 on
> AMD64. It's been reported several times in their BTS, but there's
> been no answer so far (at least on the BTS; I haven't checked their
> mailing list, if they have one).
This will be
Hi,
I'm trying to compile QT4 (beta) on a debian amd64, kernel 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8.
Very surprisingly, compilation aborts when trying to build a shared library,
while succeeds with a static build.
Has anyone ever met this kind of situation ?
jmt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Hi,
I'm trying to compile QT4 (beta) on a debian amd64, kernel 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8.
Very surprisingly, compilation aborts when trying to build a shared library,
while succeeds with a static build.
Has anyone ever met this kind of situation ?
jmt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
32 matches
Mail list logo
