Title: Message
Has onyone
successfully installed the nvidia provided drivers for the GeForce FX 5900XT or
similar chipset?
I have a base-debian
pure64 netinstall + xserver-common. et. al using the basic nv driver. I
have kdm as my window manager and am running KDE3.3.x and it all works q
Noone ? :-(
I'd very much appreciate comments on this board, since this is my
first system built while I'm using linux only and I want to get it
100% right.
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Hannes.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hannes Mayer
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 20:14:01 +0100
Sub
> Yes, it was the me you replied to in the thread mentioned above and I did
> try this image, but same problem: it gets to the point of loading the
> sata_nv driver and then it stalls for about 30 secs. Continuing with the
> installation just results in the disk not being detected.
OK, that is wei
Javier Kohen wrote:
Hi Kyuu,
Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
Thank you for the tip. I can now confirm that the A8V-E Deluxe
onboard NIC will function with kernel versions up to 2.6.9 but not
with 2.6.10 or .11. After I set up 2.6.9, I ran the install.sh script
that came with the driver from syskonnect.com
Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:21:35 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>>> My understand that the solo reason for the i386 chroot to exist is to
>>> avoid messing up 64bit and 32bit libraries. Is that so?
>>
>> The reason for a chroot is so you can run "apt-get" and
Ed Tomlinson wrote on 06/03/2005 00:06:
In any case, if you wish to keep it on your system, just mark it as manually
installed 'm' in aptitude.
Is there any way to do this from the command line?
Yes, at least a workaround is possible:
Abort whichever operation would uninstall the package, then
apt
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:21:35 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> My understand that the solo reason for the i386 chroot to exist is to
>> avoid messing up 64bit and 32bit libraries. Is that so?
>
> The reason for a chroot is so you can run "apt-get" and "dpkg".
Can I chroot into my existing s
Hi Kyuu,
Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
Thank you for the tip. I can now confirm that the A8V-E Deluxe onboard
NIC will function with kernel versions up to 2.6.9 but not with 2.6.10
or .11. After I set up 2.6.9, I ran the install.sh script that came with
the driver from syskonnect.com and generated a pat
Ryan Senior wrote:
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 18:11 +0200, Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Friday, 04 March 2005 21:07, Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
Alois Zoitl wrote:
Hi,
i got this htin g yesterday and I'm not to glad about it because I
can not get the network ru
Dale E. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed my SN95G5 with very few problems. (During the CD part of the
> install the network card did not work, once I was running from the disk it
> was fine.) I'm writing this message on it right now (albeit from the x86
> port - I sometimes run am
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 05:19:42PM -0600, Mike Reinehr wrote:
> In any case, if you wish to keep it on your system, just mark it as
> manually installed 'm' in aptitude.
Is there any way to do this from the command line?
Not that I'm aware of. Of course, aptitude is an ncurses application, not an
On Saturday 05 March 2005 17:31, Mike Reinehr wrote:
> Ed,
>
> There are times that I certainly wondered what the h___ was going on!
>
> The first thing that comes to mind is that xfs was installed automatically to
> satisfy a dependency of some other program, which subsequently has been
> remo
On Saturday 05 March 2005 05:06 pm, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Saturday 05 March 2005 17:31, Mike Reinehr wrote:
> > Ed,
> >
> > There are times that I certainly wondered what the h___ was going on!
> >
> > The first thing that comes to mind is that xfs was installed
> > automatically to satisfy a de
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:33:39 +0100
Vanuxem Grégory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le samedi 05 mars 2005 à 16:43 -0500, Ed Tomlinson a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thought the advice was to use aptitude because it will remove unused
> > packages... Well it seems to think xfs is unused, guess that ps is
Ed,
There are times that I certainly wondered what the h___ was going on!
The first thing that comes to mind is that xfs was installed automatically to
satisfy a dependency of some other program, which subsequently has been
removed. (IIRC there are two different font servers that can be used wi
Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> My understand that the solo reason for the i386 chroot to exist is to
> avoid messing up 64bit and 32bit libraries. Is that so?
The reason for a chroot is so you can run "apt-get" and "dpkg".
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Le samedi 05 mars 2005 à 16:43 -0500, Ed Tomlinson a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Thought the advice was to use aptitude because it will remove unused
> packages... Well
> it seems to think xfs is unused, guess that ps is must be wrong... Me thinks
> I'll revert to
> apt-get - aptitude seems very broken
Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hello,
>
> for some reason, fbpanel from the pure64 pool segfaults on my pure64
> system. if i fetch the package sources and rebuild it on my own,
> it works like a charm.
> it doesn't matter whether i build it with gcc-3.4 or gcc-3.3, both work
> well.
>
Hi,
Thought the advice was to use aptitude because it will remove unused
packages... Well
it seems to think xfs is unused, guess that ps is must be wrong... Me thinks
I'll revert to
apt-get - aptitude seems very broken.
Anyone else see this sort of error on pure64?
Ed
grover:/usr/bin# apt
Thanks for the reply, wow, that IS fast.
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 13:30:52 -0800, Alex Perry wrote:
>> I'm running an i386 Debian Sarge perfectly well, and I have sufficient
>> spare partitions to test AMD64 Sarge. In this case, is it ok just to
>> append my i386 tool paths to the PATH and add i386 l
> Yes, I have a SN95G5 and I have had no luck in installing any of the iso
> images distributed on alioth. It is the sata controller which is the
> stumbling block, the controller is recognized, but the disk attached to
> it is not. It does work with Ubuntu though, so it is not that the
> hardware
The quick answer:
It doesn't matter whether the i386 is inside, outside, or next to the
amd64 chroot. I've got them next to each other, just for symmetry.
Tong wrote:
My understand that the solo reason for the i386 chroot to exist is to
avoid messing up 64bit and 32bit libraries. Is that so?
Ye
Hi,
My understand that the solo reason for the i386 chroot to exist is to
avoid messing up 64bit and 32bit libraries. Is that so?
I'm running an i386 Debian Sarge perfectly well, and I have sufficient
spare partitions to test AMD64 Sarge. In this case, is it ok just to
append my i386 tool paths
Does anybody try to install the ati drivers fglrx 8.10.19 with the latest
stable 2.6.11 Kernel.
I'm currently using the a 2.6.10 kernel with the fglrx-installer 8.10.19-1
from flavio's pages. And it work great. Thanks flavio.
But the fglrx modules refuse to compile with a 2.6.11 kernel !
Ludov
Alex Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(1) Does anybody have experience of Debian/Sid/AMD64 _not_ working on
the Shuttle SN85 or SN95 motherboards - that are in their XPC units ?
Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
Yes, I have a SN95G5 and I have had no luck in installing any
of the iso images distributed o
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 18:11 +0200, Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
> Wesley J Landaker wrote:
>
> >On Friday, 04 March 2005 21:07, Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Alois Zoitl wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>i got this htin g yesterday and I'm not to glad about it because I
> >>>can not get the
Hi all!
I'm about to switch to a AMD64 system :-)
First I want to run 32bit sarge on the main HD, but I want a second
disk with the amd64 port for testing and experimentation.
I got a nice quote on the Gigabyte GA K8-NS Pro motherboard and wonder
if anyone has experience with it. Any known issues
hello,
for some reason, fbpanel from the pure64 pool segfaults on my pure64
system. if i fetch the package sources and rebuild it on my own,
it works like a charm.
it doesn't matter whether i build it with gcc-3.4 or gcc-3.3, both work
well.
any suggestions, why the package in the pool segfaults?
Alex Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (1) Does anybody have experience of Debian/Sid/AMD64 _not_ working on
> the Shuttle SN85 or SN95 motherboards - that are in their XPC units ?
Yes, I have a SN95G5 and I have had no luck in installing any
of the iso images distributed on alioth. It is the s
On Saturday, 05 March 2005 09:11, Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
> Yes, I figured as much, but as I also noted, it doesn't work either.
> Quoting myself:
>
> - the latest driver from syskonnect.com fails during "Compile the
> kernel" when running install.sh, either expert or user mode. The
> install.log co
Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Friday, 04 March 2005 21:07, Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
Alois Zoitl wrote:
Hi,
i got this htin g yesterday and I'm not to glad about it because I
can not get the network running.
As far as I found out it uses also the sk98lin driver.
But the standard driver that comes
On Friday, 04 March 2005 21:07, Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
> Alois Zoitl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i got this htin g yesterday and I'm not to glad about it because I
> > can not get the network running.
> > As far as I found out it uses also the sk98lin driver.
> > But the standard driver that comes along
Fredrik Vraalsen wrote:
I'm using the vesa driver for X at the moment, until Debian gets X.org
which supports the ati chip (radeon 9200 igp) or I figure out how to get
the ati proprietary drivers to work after the changes to the 2.6.10/11
kernel I guess. ;)
The on-board ATI video is a new direct
hello,
for some reason, fbpanel from the pure64 pool segfaults on my pure64
system. if i fetch the package sources and rebuild it on my own,
it works like a charm.
it doesn't matter whether i build it with gcc-3.4 or gcc-3.3, both work
well.
any suggestions, why the package in the pool segfaults?
Hi Kyuu,
> As it's installed in a
> Flex ATX case with half height PCI slots, using a common PCI
> network card isn't an option.
You can use a generic RTL8139 card in a half-height case - the boards
are tiny. Either get one with a half-height bracket, or for the DIY
method, get the full-size b
Hi,
I would like to report success for installing Debian AMD64 on the MSI
RS480M2 mainboard (socket 939) which is based on the ATI Xpress 200
chipset with integrated graphics. This was using the sid netboot ISO
(20050303) and installing on a regular IDE harddrive (not SATA).
To get the install
36 matches
Mail list logo
