Hello. I'm not sure if anyone has suggested something like this or
not but I was thinking about the apt-get system and bittorrent today.
What if the apt-get system was redesigned so that users could download
updates and upgrades from other users? This way they would trickle
out to people, slowly
On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 10:03:13PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> the debian amd64 port is rapidly maturing and apart from beeing so new
> its reaching a point where the goals needed for it to be released
> would be met (i.e. D-I support, most packages compiled, ...).
>
> Amd64 was recently disc
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 06:43:38PM -0500, Javier Kohen wrote:
>
> What packages in main provide java2-compiler? Practically every package
> that's waiting for a dependency blames that one.
None provide it. Those packages are also all in contrib for that
reason. They are provided by packages as
El sÃb, 19-03-2005 a las 00:30 +0100, Kurt Roeckx escribiÃ:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:57:42PM -0500, Tong wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since about 99% of packages have been ported to AMD64, I'm wondering where
> > I can obtain a list of packages that are not available in AMD64 yet.
> >
> > PS. I f
On Friday 18 March 2005 14:54, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
> Could you include the section of dmesg where ide is detected and setup?
> Gotta make sure it didn't load ide-generic before the sis driver in
> which case the generic driver (which is not dma capable obviously) is
> running the drives inst
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:57:42PM -0500, Tong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since about 99% of packages have been ported to AMD64, I'm wondering where
> I can obtain a list of packages that are not available in AMD64 yet.
>
> PS. I found 2 files on alioth, but I didn't find the ooffice there:
>
> http://d
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:26:02 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib in my ldconfig, and running openoffice works
>> fine without having to chroot or anything.
>
> Running it outside the chroot needs a symlink. See this thread.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2003/03/msg
Hi,
Since about 99% of packages have been ported to AMD64, I'm wondering where
I can obtain a list of packages that are not available in AMD64 yet.
PS. I found 2 files on alioth, but I didn't find the ooffice there:
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/needs-porting.txt
http://debian-a
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:43:06 +0100, Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2005 21:15, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> > It should probably say "is a static executable". That would be more clear.
> >
>
> Not necesserally, it could be anything else too. it could be a script, a
> picture, a device, e
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 21:07 +0100, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> First I tried to use pptp from alioth, but that did not work, so as a
> last resort I tried to run the 32bit versions and voila! They worked!
Definitely check your PPTP settings. If you want the best encryption and
compression, you'll have t
On Friday 18 March 2005 21:15, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> It should probably say "is a static executable". That would be more clear.
>
Not necesserally, it could be anything else too. it could be a script, a
picture, a device, etc ..., or a static excecutable.
ldd had only one error for all files it
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:06:53 +0100, Ernest jw ter Kuile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > not a dynamic executable
>
> Indeed: Static
>
> ;o)
Thanks Ernest!
The message is a bit confusing. At least I was confused, since it said
it is "not a ... executable". It should probably say "is a sta
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:51:57 -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:36:26PM +0100, Hannes Mayer wrote:
[...]
> > # ldd pppd
> > /usr/bin/ldd: line 145: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: No such file or directory
> > ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (127)
>
> That means
> not a dynamic executable
Indeed: Static
;o)
Ernest.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:36:26PM +0100, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:20:08 -0600, Stephen Waters wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 20:15 +0100, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> [...]
> > > How come that 32bit binaries run on pure64 without any chroot or the
> > > ia32 libs installed ?
> >
>
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:20:08 -0600, Stephen Waters wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 20:15 +0100, Hannes Mayer wrote:
[...]
> > How come that 32bit binaries run on pure64 without any chroot or the
> > ia32 libs installed ?
>
> They're probably statically compiled so they'll work on any system. Run
>
On Friday 18 March 2005 20:15, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> How come that 32bit binaries run on pure64 without any chroot or the
> ia32 libs installed ?
They are probably statically linked.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:15:49PM +0100, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> I just installed pure64 on a spare disk for testing.
> In order to connect to the net, I got a tar.gz from my provider with
> precompiled binaries of dhcpcd, pptp, and pppd and some scripts. It
> works very well on sarge (32bit) but su
Hi all!
I just installed pure64 on a spare disk for testing.
In order to connect to the net, I got a tar.gz from my provider with
precompiled binaries of dhcpcd, pptp, and pppd and some scripts. It
works very well on sarge (32bit) but surprisingly enough those
binaries also work on pure64!
How co
Hi folks
I searched on the oficele OpenOffice Homepage for a port on the amd64.
In the mailing-list I found something about a cvs-version.
do anyone of you have installed it on his system and made experiences
with it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:55:22 +0100, Oliver Korpilla
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On my MSI motherboard there are the following devices:
>
> :00:11.0 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 437a
> :00:12.0 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4379
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:45:18AM +, Daniel James wrote:
> DeMuDi still uses XFree86 rather than X.org for the time being, the
> monitor autodetection doesn't work properly, and dpkg-reconfigure
> xserver-xfree86 doesn't overwrite /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 like it
> should, for some reason.
Pe
*** Regarding harddisk DMA; Uwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adds:
Uwe> i have 2.6.10-9 installed on SIS chipset hardware. the
Uwe> SIS5513 module is loaded, but doesn't work with DMA support for
Uwe> my harddisks. hdparm -d1 /dev/hda tells me that this operation
Uwe> is not supported:
I had a similar pr
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:04:07AM +0100, Uwe wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i have 2.6.10-9 installed on SIS chipset hardware. the SIS5513 module is
> loaded, but doesn't work with DMA support for my harddisks.
> hdparm -d1 /dev/hda tells me that this operation is not supported:
>
> filou:~# cat /proc/
Le vendredi 18 mars 2005 à 08:23 +0100, Egon Willighagen a écrit :
HtDig 3.2 compiles out of the box, and works well (a bit slow...) but i
think there's no debian package yet (has been announced ?.?.)...
I've not tried yet to recompile 3.1.6.
> And I was thinking that I did something wrong ! :(
Oh ok! I'll give that a go when I get home from work :)
Daniel James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> Hi James,
>
> > I've installed DeMuDi on the other 6gb hard drive here. Install
> > went fine, but X wont be starting.
>
> DeMuDi still uses XFree86 rather than X.org for the time being, the
> mo
Hi James,
> I've installed DeMuDi on the other 6gb hard drive here. Install
> went fine, but X wont be starting.
DeMuDi still uses XFree86 rather than X.org for the time being, the
monitor autodetection doesn't work properly, and dpkg-reconfigure
xserver-xfree86 doesn't overwrite /etc/X11/XF86C
Daniel James wrote:
As far as I know, no-one is producing a patched kernel of this kind
yet, which is why I was going down the DIY route. If all goes
according to plan there should be some debs available by next month.
Ok - Let me know either by the list or directly, and I'll be willing to
he
Hi Christian,
> I don't have a /lib32. Is this the Multi-Arch thing the HOWTO talks
> about in the section about future plans or do they thave yet
> another approach?
I'm not quite sure how Ubuntu does it, but it looks like they've just
added 32-bit libraries for programs that can't run without
Hi James,
> Does anyone know where I can find a binary zero-latency kernel
> 2.6.10 (for amd64 obviously..)?
As far as I know, no-one is producing a patched kernel of this kind
yet, which is why I was going down the DIY route. If all goes
according to plan there should be some debs available by
kile (a nice TeX program part of KDE for those who havn't heard of it)
crashes when you run the quick start wizard.
I have filed a bug at kde.org
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101670
and have emailed the Debian maintainer but he says he isn't the
packager for the 64 bit releases and doesn't
hi there,
i have 2.6.10-9 installed on SIS chipset hardware. the SIS5513 module is
loaded, but doesn't work with DMA support for my harddisks.
hdparm -d1 /dev/hda tells me that this operation is not supported:
filou:~# cat /proc/ide/hda/settings
namevalue min
32 matches
Mail list logo
