Re: # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set

2005-04-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oliver, That does clear things up a bit, even if it is quite a bit to take in... Previous to applying the realtime-lsm patches, audio recording/playback with multi-track hard disk recorders such as Ardour was very laggy and the audio skipped with more than 3 or so

Re: # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set

2005-04-05 Thread james
Well, optimize your results you could apply the Low-Latency-Patches and enable preemption, this should give the best possible result for the standard kernel with your application. I may give that a go! Many thanks, James ___ Sent Using: Total Carnage WebMail,

Trouble getting nvidia driver running

2005-04-05 Thread Lennart Sorensen
I installed Debian on our new server (I wanted to see how the 64bit version is doing and it counts as burnin test to me), and so far everything pretty much just worked. System is: Asus A8V-Deluxe 2 * 512MB Kingston RAM (PC3200 CL3) A64 3500+ (939pin) PX716A ATAPI DVD writer 2 * WD2500JD SATA

Re: Trouble getting nvidia driver running

2005-04-05 Thread Jacob Bresciani
don't supposed you could cut and paste the X-Log into here so I can have a look? I'm currently using the same setup (just drop the -deluxe from the motherboard, and a standard IDE disk) although I compiled my own kernel and used the NVIDIA driver from www.nvidia.com. Every thing works here. I am

DMA problem

2005-04-05 Thread Bhushan Kulkarni
Hello List , i have sis5513 ide controller , when i try to enable DMA for my Harddisk , cdrom, i get following message -- # hdparm -d1 /dev/hda /dev/hda: setting using_dma to 1 (on) HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted using_dma= 0 (off) I am running 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8

a8v acpi

2005-04-05 Thread Bill
Hi, I am running Debian sid (i386, though I am posting here because I am using an Asus A8V motherboard, Athlon64 3500+), I can't seem to make acpi suspend to ram work, when I suspend the system (kernel 2.6.11.6), everything seems to work, when I bring it back from sleepingI hear the system

Re: a8v acpi

2005-04-05 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:25:39PM -0500, Bill wrote: I am running Debian sid (i386, though I am posting here because I am using an Asus A8V motherboard, Athlon64 3500+), I can't seem to make acpi suspend to ram work, when I suspend the system (kernel 2.6.11.6), everything seems to work,

Re: DMA problem

2005-04-05 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:49:32AM +0530, Bhushan Kulkarni wrote: Hello List , i have sis5513 ide controller , when i try to enable DMA for my Harddisk , cdrom, i get following message -- # hdparm -d1 /dev/hda /dev/hda: setting using_dma to 1 (on) HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation

Re: Trouble getting nvidia driver running

2005-04-05 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Jacob Bresciani wrote: don't supposed you could cut and paste the X-Log into here so I can have a look? I'm currently using the same setup (just drop the -deluxe from the motherboard, and a standard IDE disk) although I compiled my own kernel and

Ati chipsets

2005-04-05 Thread Niklas Ögren
I've heard rumour about Linux not able to support ati chipsets that much.. Is that a generic, or a pure64 problem? Anybody been running pure64 (or x86 debian) on ATI RADEON® XPRESS 200P chipset? /n

Re: Ati chipsets

2005-04-05 Thread Javier Kohen
El mar, 05-04-2005 a las 21:54 +0200, Niklas gren escribi: I've heard rumour about Linux not able to support ati chipsets that much.. Is that a generic, or a pure64 problem? Anybody been running pure64 (or x86 debian) on ATI RADEON XPRESS 200P chipset? Been using my Radeon 9600 Mobility

Re: Trouble getting nvidia driver running

2005-04-05 Thread Jacob Bresciani
I seem to remember a problem where nvidia didnt put the glx driver in the right place and a softlink needed to be inserted to fix it. But that involved one of either /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/extensions/libglx.so or /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so not existing (can't remember which) and

Re: Trouble getting nvidia driver running

2005-04-05 Thread Zachary Rizer
I had a similar issue -- have you made sure that /usr/lib64 is a symlink to /usr/lib and *not* a directory? Zaq Rizer --- Jacob Bresciani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I seem to remember a problem where nvidia didnt put the glx driver in the right place and a softlink needed to be inserted to

Re: Trouble getting nvidia driver running

2005-04-05 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:17:02PM -0700, Jacob Bresciani wrote: I seem to remember a problem where nvidia didnt put the glx driver in the right place and a softlink needed to be inserted to fix it. But that involved one of either /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/extensions/libglx.so or

Re: Trouble getting nvidia driver running

2005-04-05 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:29:09PM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote: I had a similar issue -- have you made sure that /usr/lib64 is a symlink to /usr/lib and *not* a directory? Well I didn't create it, something on the system did, and yes it is a symlink. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Trouble getting nvidia driver running

2005-04-05 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:17:02PM -0700, Jacob Bresciani wrote: I seem to remember a problem where nvidia didnt put the glx driver in the right place and a softlink needed to be inserted to fix it. But that involved one of either /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/extensions/libglx.so or

Re: Trouble getting nvidia driver running

2005-04-05 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:46:36PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: Hmm, I tried a different monitor, and things just work. I sure feel silly now. And this right after I reinstalled Debian 5 times yesterday before discovering that the boot order was not set to CD, HD as I was sure I did, but

Re: Trouble getting nvidia driver running

2005-04-05 Thread Jacob Bresciani
sounds about right to me. On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 16:56 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:46:36PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: Hmm, I tried a different monitor, and things just work. I sure feel silly now. And this right after I reinstalled Debian 5 times yesterday

Re: Trouble getting nvidia driver running

2005-04-05 Thread David Liontooth
Lennart Sorensen wrote: My problem is when I install the nvidia-glx driver (and hence nvidia-kernel-source) and compiler it, X seems to start, but simply turns off the monitor (bad signal sent to screen so it turns off). Switching to the text console works fine. I can start and stop X just fine,

Libesd0-alsa

2005-04-05 Thread Javier Kohen
I decided to give pure64 a second try after the problems I've been having with the Epiphany Browser on the gcc-4.0 archive. I don't mind running Tomcat 4 and whatnot in the chroot jail, but I couldn't find libesd0-alsa either in the package listing nor in the failed, dep-wait and not-for-us text

Tyan Tiger K8S (S2850G2NR) ?

2005-04-05 Thread Paul Reilly
Is anyone using debian 64 on a Tyan Tiger K8S (S2850G2NR) ? Are there any issues with running debian on this board? Looking at the specs it appears everything should be ok but I'd like to hear first hand from anyone who uses it. I'm just about to buy one of these with an Opteron 242. Thanks,

Re: gcc-3.4 archive

2005-04-05 Thread Ed Cogburn
On Monday 04 April 2005 3:16pm, Javier Kohen wrote: Hi, I've been using the /gcc-3.4 archive from Alioth. Is there any difference among that one, debian-gcc-3.4 and debian-pure64-3.4? I mean a user-noticeable difference, I've read archive-structure and I think I understand, but gcc-3.4 isn't

MythTV fails with debian-pure64

2005-04-05 Thread Craig Puetz
I have not been able to get mythfrontend (running on the same machine as the backend) to work. The application screen goes blank as soon as I attempt to watch live TV. I found the following threads that seem to apply: http://pvrguide.no-ip.com/bbs-old/viewtopic.php?t=19769

Re: Tyan Tiger K8S (S2850G2NR) ?

2005-04-05 Thread David Liontooth
Paul Reilly wrote: Is anyone using debian 64 on a Tyan Tiger K8S (S2850G2NR) ? Are there any issues with running debian on this board? Looking at the specs it appears everything should be ok but I'd like to hear first hand from anyone who uses it. I'm just about to buy one of these with an Opteron

Re: Ati chipsets

2005-04-05 Thread Niklas Ögren
I've heard rumour about Linux not able to support ati chipsets that much.. Is that a generic, or a pure64 problem? Anybody been running pure64 (or x86 debian) on ATI RADEON® XPRESS 200P chipset? Been using my Radeon 9600 Mobility with free and official ATI drivers for a year or so. The XFree86

32 chroot - Openoffice has no menus

2005-04-05 Thread Tobias Krais
Dear list members, yesterday I installed a i386 chroot on my 64 bit system, according to the AMD64 Howto. But now I want to start my Openoffice - and well it starts, but without Menus. To me it seems, that there are some Libraries missing. Can somebody tell me what to do that the Menus are here

Re: Ati chipsets

2005-04-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niklas Ögren wrote: I've heard rumour about Linux not able to support ati chipsets that much.. Is that a generic, or a pure64 problem? Anybody been running pure64 (or x86 debian) on ATI RADEON® XPRESS 200P chipset? I have the non-P version on an MSI board. User experience is _POOR_. * Clock is

Re: Ati chipsets

2005-04-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Javier Kohen wrote: El mar, 05-04-2005 a las 21:54 +0200, Niklas gren escribi: I've heard rumour about Linux not able to support ati chipsets that much.. Is that a generic, or a pure64 problem? Anybody been running pure64 (or x86 debian) on ATI RADEON XPRESS 200P chipset? Been using my Radeon