Re: The future of the gcc-3.4 archive / Name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' Reply-To:

2005-04-10 Thread Harald Dunkel
Andreas Jochens wrote: > > If nobody else comes up with a different proposal and > no other problems occur, I would like to change the > name on 2005-03-15 (three weeks from now). > Any news about this? Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: librairies troubles, chroot_installation_gcc4, vmware5, k3b

2005-04-10 Thread Manuel Capinha
I just installed vmware5 and had the same problem with libz. As a solution: add the ia32 lib compat package if you haven't done so already. Afterwards, install zlibc in the chroot and copy the libz.so from /usr/lib to your /emul/ dir in the 64bit side. Worked for me :) HTH, Manuel On Apr 10, 2005

Re: Nvidia problems... again

2005-04-10 Thread A.E.Lawrence
James Titcumb wrote: The thing that's strange, is that previous to building the 2.6.11 kernel up (when i was on 2.6.10), the nvidia driver built + installed fine, but now it doesn't... perhaps it's a disagreement with the 2.6.11 kernel?? I have just built version 7174 of nvidia (NVIDIA-Linux-x

Re: [Fwd: Re: need advice for correct sources.list because of broken packages]

2005-04-10 Thread A.E.Lawrence
Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 10:31:33PM +0100, A.E.Lawrence wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20) but 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 is to be installed Please downgrade your libc6 to the 2.3.2.ds1-20 version. This might req

librairies troubles, chroot_installation_gcc4, vmware5, k3b

2005-04-10 Thread Gauthier DELERCE
Hi all, I'm using a sarge on my desktop and I have few problems : when I install a ia-32 in my chroot it stops at : Couldn't download gcc-4.0-base , this has already been posted : http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/01/msg00716.html but I don't know how to fix my system I would also t

Re: Nvidia problems... again

2005-04-10 Thread David Liontooth
James Titcumb wrote: I would ask on the nVidia Linux Forum http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=14 They don't seem to be very responsive, unlike here :) That said, if you're trying to troubleshoot, why not use the nv driver? It's excellent for 2D work. I would use nv dri

Re: Nvidia problems... again

2005-04-10 Thread gandrel
I forgot to write: NVIDIA Driver Version: 1.0-7167 -- Grzegorz Andrelczyk | WszechÅwiat - kilka praktycznych informacji: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 1.Obszar: nieskoÅczony; 2. Import: brak; www.nie-panikuj.w.pl | 3.Eksport: brak; 4.LudnoÅÄ: brak; 5.Waluta: brak; | 6.Sztuk

Re: Nvidia problems... again

2005-04-10 Thread gandrel
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 07:41:27PM +0100, James Titcumb wrote: > Hello all, > > I've managed to set up nvidia drivers before on this amd64 machine, but > since I've upgraded to my new kernel 2.6.11 with realtime-lsm, nvidia > module doesn't want to work. > > Says something about interupt reques

Re: Nvidia problems... again

2005-04-10 Thread James Titcumb
2.6.11 removed a few symbols that were present before. There are patches around that bring the symbols back, that may be an intermediate solution until NVidia updates the driver. I'll have a look into that... thanks for the pointer :) That having said, I you don't need great 3D performance, but

Re: Nvidia problems... again

2005-04-10 Thread Thomas Steffen
On Apr 10, 2005 9:17 PM, James Titcumb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The thing that's strange, is that previous to building the 2.6.11 kernel > up (when i was on 2.6.10), the nvidia driver built + installed fine, but > now it doesn't... perhaps it's a disagreement with the 2.6.11 kernel?? 2.6.11 r

Re: tg3 + kernel-image-2.6.11-9* .... How do we know when it will work?

2005-04-10 Thread David Liontooth
Jeremy Gray wrote: I have a tyan s2880 motherboard with dual broadcom NICs on it. When I upgraded to the latest kernel, (kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8-smp) I lost the NIC because I guess tg3 support wasn't included. Does it work yet? Is there somewhere to track this so we know when it will wor

Re: Muse, QJackctl etc. problems

2005-04-10 Thread James Titcumb
Hi Free, Thanks, but unfortunately still doesn't run: no locale / panic: alloc 56 Segmentation fault in /var/log/messages: Apr 10 20:18:09 bathory4 kernel: muse[7044]: segfault at 0018 rip 2d40529b rsp 73b0 error 6 Perhaps there's an error in the code or something.

Re: Nvidia problems... again

2005-04-10 Thread James Titcumb
I would ask on the nVidia Linux Forum http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=14 They don't seem to be very responsive, unlike here :) That said, if you're trying to troubleshoot, why not use the nv driver? It's excellent for 2D work. I would use nv driver (I am using it now

Re: sys_ioctl under amd64 (Was: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs)

2005-04-10 Thread Thomas Steffen
On Apr 10, 2005 7:47 PM, Cyril Chaboisseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do you think it's the "console switching" or the XFree86 drivers ? I had a discussion with Lutz Donnerhacke (iirc) about that a few years ago. He said (and I do agree), that the console switching in Linux is broken by design.

Re: sys_ioctl under amd64 (Was: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs)

2005-04-10 Thread Cyril Chaboisseau
On April 10th at 19:24, Thomas Steffen wrote: > On Apr 10, 2005 6:42 PM, Cyril Chaboisseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - I have 2 X sessions running at the same time (:0 and :1 respectively > > on vt7/vt8) and 3D acceleration is only enable on one of them > > You should consider yourself ver

Re: sys_ioctl under amd64 (Was: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs)

2005-04-10 Thread Thomas Steffen
On Apr 10, 2005 6:42 PM, Cyril Chaboisseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - I have 2 X sessions running at the same time (:0 and :1 respectively > on vt7/vt8) and 3D acceleration is only enable on one of them You should consider yourself very lucky. When I try to start another X server, everything

sys_ioctl under amd64 (Was: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs)

2005-04-10 Thread Cyril Chaboisseau
I'm answering to my own post because up until now, I had the error for which I found the solution which might help others... Jan. 20th at 23:17, Cyril Chaboisseau wrote: > the compilation of the packages went almost smoothly (I just had to > modify a couple usr/X11R6/lib to usr/X11R6/lib64) but

Large libm library

2005-04-10 Thread Hugh Waite
Hello, I'm wondering, mostly from curiosity, why the maths library is so much larger in amd64 than the one from i386 or emul/ia32. amd64 550208 emul/ia32 134464 i386 134464 (another pc) I have an unstable debian-pure64 install with libc6 = 2.3.2.ds1-20 and ia32-libs = 0.7 Just as a test I did

Re: 32 chroot - Openoffice has no menus

2005-04-10 Thread Jean Alexandre PEYROUX
I had the same problem as you, to solve it: chroot /var/chroot/sid blackeyed:~# apt-get install xbase-clients On Apr 8, 2005 1:52 PM, Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On (07/04/05 21:53), Antti Pyykko wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Tobias Krais wrote: > > > > >But now I want to start m

Re: Radeon 9600 acceleration?

2005-04-10 Thread Thomas Steffen
Hello Adam, > I have X600 XT which, as far as I know, is based on a similar or the > same chip as 9600, but it's for PCI-e. Other relevant configuration: > > - Athlon64 3000+, 939 pins > - 2 x 512 RAM > - Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 motherboard > - XFree86 4.3 > - kernel 2.6.11 (no recompilation, as inst

Re: tg3 + kernel-image-2.6.11-9* .... How do we know when it will work?

2005-04-10 Thread Jeremy Gray
Frederik Schueler wrote: Hello, On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:01:57PM +0200, Thomas Steffen wrote: Does it work yet? Is there somewhere to track this so we know when it will work? I don't think so. I had the same problem on i386, and it seems that the non-free part of the kernel source is no

Re: Muse, QJackctl etc. problems

2005-04-10 Thread Free Ekanayaka
JT> No superuser privileges, enabling system timer fallback Try to run it with set uid: chmod u+s /usr/bin/muse cheers, free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Radeon 9600 acceleration?

2005-04-10 Thread Alexander Nagel
Thomas Steffen schrieb: Hi, first of all, thank's a lot for the amd64 port despite all the odds of the Debian infrastructure. 64bit userland rocks, and it feels significantly faster than i386 userland. But I can't get 3D acceleration to work with my Radeon 9600. I know that 3D acceleration with bin

Re: tg3 + kernel-image-2.6.11-9* .... How do we know when it will work?

2005-04-10 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:01:57PM +0200, Thomas Steffen wrote: > > Does it work yet? Is there somewhere to track this so we know when it > > will work? > > I don't think so. I had the same problem on i386, and it seems that > the non-free part of the kernel source is not there yet. Indee

Re: tg3 + kernel-image-2.6.11-9* .... How do we know when it will work?

2005-04-10 Thread Thomas Steffen
On Apr 10, 2005 12:54 PM, Jeremy Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it work yet? Is there somewhere to track this so we know when it > will work? I don't think so. I had the same problem on i386, and it seems that the non-free part of the kernel source is not there yet. I got a nondebian ker

tg3 + kernel-image-2.6.11-9* .... How do we know when it will work?

2005-04-10 Thread Jeremy Gray
I have a tyan s2880 motherboard with dual broadcom NICs on it. When I upgraded to the latest kernel, (kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8-smp) I lost the NIC because I guess tg3 support wasn't included. Does it work yet? Is there somewhere to track this so we know when it will work? When I try to d

Re: Radeon 9600 acceleration?

2005-04-10 Thread Adam Podstawczynski
Thomas Steffen wrote: (...) But I can't get 3D acceleration to work with my Radeon 9600. I know that 3D acceleration with binary only drivers is always difficult to set up, but whatever I try, it either does no recognise the acceleration, or it crashes the moment I run glxgears or fgl_glxgears. My

Re: Installer and installed system differ in disk enumeration

2005-04-10 Thread Thomas Steffen
On Apr 10, 2005 10:28 AM, A.E.Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Presumably the installer kernal and target kernels load modules in a > different order. I wonder it is possible to load them in the same order? The installer may load the kernel modules triggered by the udev-packages, whereas the

Installer and installed system differ in disk enumeration

2005-04-10 Thread A.E.Lawrence
Sata disk enumeration and installer on amd64 I have an ASUS a8n-sli Deluxe mbrd populated with 6 hard disks:- a) 1 scsi b) 1 IDE on pata (legacy, parallel ata c) 4 sata 1) Disk enumeration differs between installer and installed system -

Radeon 9600 acceleration?

2005-04-10 Thread Thomas Steffen
Hi, first of all, thank's a lot for the amd64 port despite all the odds of the Debian infrastructure. 64bit userland rocks, and it feels significantly faster than i386 userland. But I can't get 3D acceleration to work with my Radeon 9600. I know that 3D acceleration with binary only drivers is al