Re: alsa-tools on debian amd64

2005-04-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:33:44PM +1000, Norval Watson wrote: checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. You will have to look at config.log to find out what's wrong. My guess is

Re: Bug#306711: Current buildd output/logs

2005-04-29 Thread Peter Van Eynde
Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:36:26PM +1000, Steve Smith wrote: Hi, I've reported a bug in the building of AMD64 port of SBCL and the maintainer has asked me the buildd logs. Are these available online? The log is available at:

hmm, do I miss some package or is this a real problem?

2005-04-29 Thread jpahka
Hi again, Well, now I've gotten to the point of starting actually make my installation useful. And in order to make it useful, I need DirectFB (www.directfb.org). But the version in sid repository is 0.9.20 and I need a newer one. So I grabbed the source package from the website and tried to

Question regarding gcc-3.4 archive

2005-04-29 Thread Alois Zoitl
Hallo, maybe a stupid question but I'm using now gcc-3.4 since a bought my amd64 and I'm quite satisfied with it. (use it as normal workstation and for me its stable) As I tried the last apt-get update two days ago I noticed that there are some differences in the source lists. so I took the new

Re: Question regarding gcc-3.4 archive

2005-04-29 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 05-Apr-29 13:23, Alois Zoitl wrote: Hallo, maybe a stupid question but I'm using now gcc-3.4 since a bought my amd64 and I'm quite satisfied with it. (use it as normal workstation and for me its stable) As I tried the last apt-get update two days ago I noticed that there are some

Re: Question regarding gcc-3.4 archive

2005-04-29 Thread Alexander Rapp
Alois Zoitl wrote: Hallo, maybe a stupid question but I'm using now gcc-3.4 since a bought my amd64 and I'm quite satisfied with it. (use it as normal workstation and for me its stable) As I tried the last apt-get update two days ago I noticed that there are some differences in the source

Re: hmm, do I miss some package or is this a real problem?

2005-04-29 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, you need to install kernel-headers-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8, it contains the directory the build symlink is pointing to. Kind regards Frederik Schueler On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:16:31PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and indeed, there is no 'build' directory. anyway to have it without

Re: Bug#306711: Current buildd output/logs

2005-04-29 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:12:25AM +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote: I found the problem: during the build the system does a self-test that uses /dev/log, this fails with a connection refused: Test SB-BSD-SOCKETS-TEST::SIMPLE-LOCAL-CLIENT failed Form: (PROGN (WHEN (AND

Need help with ctypes Bug#298157

2005-04-29 Thread Ganesan Rajagopal
Hi, I need access to a sid chroot on a amd64 system with Build-Depends for python-ctypes (libffi2-dev, python, python2.3-dev, python2.4-dev, debhelper) to debug Bug#298157. Can someone help? I am not subscribed to debian-amd64, so please CC me any responses. Thanks. Ganesan -- Ganesan

Re: hmm, do I miss some package or is this a real problem?

2005-04-29 Thread jpahka
Lainaus Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, you need to install kernel-headers-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8, it contains the directory the build symlink is pointing to. Kind regards Frederik Schueler On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:16:31PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and indeed, there

Re: Bug#306711: Current buildd output/logs

2005-04-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes: On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:12:25AM +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote: I found the problem: during the build the system does a self-test that uses /dev/log, this fails with a connection refused: Test SB-BSD-SOCKETS-TEST::SIMPLE-LOCAL-CLIENT failed

Re: Need help with ctypes Bug#298157

2005-04-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ganesan Rajagopal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I need access to a sid chroot on a amd64 system with Build-Depends for python-ctypes (libffi2-dev, python, python2.3-dev, python2.4-dev, debhelper) to debug Bug#298157. Can someone help? I am not subscribed to debian-amd64, so please CC me any

Re: ia32-libs 1.3 brakes vmware

2005-04-29 Thread John Baab
There is a bug report out there for this problem: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306512 -John On 4/28/05, Stephan Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:18:37PM +0100, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: Just updated my ia32-libs package and found out that it brakes

nvu_0.80-3_amd64.deb

2005-04-29 Thread Jonathan Schaeffer
Hi, From the repository http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/debian-amd64/debian-pure64, I installed the nvu package which made a formidable segmentation fault:b Can anyone reproduce this ?

Re: nvu_0.80-3_amd64.deb

2005-04-29 Thread Jacob Bresciani
I get the same problem, I dug up the RPM for x86_64 for suse from www.rpmbone.com (I think) aliened it (alien nvu-version.rpm; dpkg -i nvu-version.deb) and that one works. On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 20:01 +0200, Jonathan Schaeffer wrote: Hi, From the repository

Re: nvu_0.80-3_amd64.deb

2005-04-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:01:20PM +0200, Jonathan Schaeffer wrote: Hi, From the repository http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/debian-amd64/debian-pure64, I installed the nvu package which made a formidable segmentation fault:b Can anyone reproduce this ? It looks like it's using mozilla

Re: nvu_0.80-3_amd64.deb

2005-04-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jacob Bresciani [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I get the same problem, I dug up the RPM for x86_64 for suse from www.rpmbone.com (I think) aliened it (alien nvu-version.rpm; dpkg -i nvu-version.deb) and that one works. On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 20:01 +0200, Jonathan Schaeffer wrote: Hi, From the

Re: has a timeframe been established when sarge is to...

2005-04-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Has a timeframe been established when sarge for the AMD64 bit version is to be released? Peter Release date for sarge is September 2004 + a ~week for amd64. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

The movers are in the house

2005-04-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Hi, just to let you know: the move has started. The last cron for debian-amd64 run was today at 16:40utc and importing packages to the new archive will commence as soon as Ganneff comes home from work. Stay tuned. Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: has a timeframe been established when sarge is to...

2005-04-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Goswin, Silly question I guess. What I'm really curious about, is when the official 64-bit distribution is set to take place? How stable is sarge at this point? Is there a web site that lists some stats? Peter On April 29, 2005 02:46 pm, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Broken dependencies with libc6!?

2005-04-29 Thread Dirk Salva
Hi $LIST, are there broken dependencies with AMD64-Sarge known? Today I wanted to upgrade my AMD64-Sarge, but I don't done that, because it wants to deinstall id base-files -373kB 3.1.2-0.0. 3.1.2-0.0. id bash-1855kB 3.0-14 3.0-14 id deborphan -332kB 1.7.15 1.7.15 id

Re: Broken dependencies with libc6!?

2005-04-29 Thread Javier Kohen
El vie, 29-04-2005 a las 20:54 +0200, Dirk Salva escribi: base-files hngt ab (vorher) von libc6 ( 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.1) base-files depends on (before) libc6 ( 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.1) Whats this? I assume that this is the issue that has been answered on the list about 5 times last week. You have to

Re: has a timeframe been established when sarge is to...

2005-04-29 Thread mtms
On 29 Apr 2005, 20:46, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Release date for sarge is September 2004 It's already been released and nobody told me anything? :) Sorry, but I couldn't resist :)) -- @,@ Il corpo del povero cadrebbe subito in

Re: Broken dependencies with libc6!?

2005-04-29 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Friday 29 April 2005 21:21, Javier Kohen wrote: El vie, 29-04-2005 a las 20:54 +0200, Dirk Salva escribió: base-files hängt ab (vorher) von libc6 ( 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.1) base-files depends on (before) libc6 ( 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.1) Whats this? I assume that this is the issue that has been

[SOLVED] Re: Broken dependencies with libc6!?

2005-04-29 Thread Dirk Salva
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:21:29PM -0300, Javier Kohen wrote: 5 times last week. You have to force installing version 3.1.2 of base-files. Please search the archive for last week if you need the Yes, that's it! Thank you and all others! ciao, Dirk -- | Akkuschrauber Kaufberatung and AEG