On 05-May-05 13:35, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:05:49PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > However, even with the patch from #305122, 'ia32-libs' cannot be built
> > and installed in sarge. This is the case because the patch does not
> > remove the 'Depends' and 'Build-Depend
Jannick Ingo wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I just installed via a chroot install. Installed fine, no bumps…. But
> when i installled grub, checked grub bootimages, i couldnt find them.
> They are not in the /boot/grub dir.. Neither a config is there…
>
> I know what has to be there, actually the stage files
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
As announced earlier the Debian AMD64 archive moved away from alioth
the weekend from 30. April til today, 2. May.
But what happened with
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/openoffice.org/ ?
It seemed to be moved away from alioth also but I cannot find it at
amd64.debia
Dne čt 5. května 2005 19:32 Jose Luis Iguain napsal(a):
> I have some questions about VMware.
>
> I installed it via apt-get in the ia32-chroot part but when I try to
> turn on the application,
> it complains about /dev/vmmon...
> Could you tell me how to install the vmmon and vmnet modules?
>
> I
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:05:49PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-May-05 13:53, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > retitle 307521 ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Compilation with 'gcc-3.4
> > > -m32' does not work
> > > tags 307521 +patch
> > > t
Jose Luis Iguain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have some questions about VMware.
>
> I installed it via apt-get in the ia32-chroot part but when I try to
> turn on the application,
> it complains about /dev/vmmon...
> Could you tell me how to install the vmmon and vmnet modules?
>
> Is it not p
* Andrei Mikhailovsky
| Just updated my ia32-libs package and found out that it brakes vmware.
| After the upgrade, vmware segfaults. downgrading to 1.2 fixes vmware.
|
| Did anyone else experienced similar issues, or is it just me?
Mea culpa; I uploaded 1.4 today. Can you verify that it fixe
Thank you Kurt,
you instructions worked!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> The problem is that you didn't upgrade in a while and that this version
> doesn't
> have the Conflicts + Replaces anymore that should do the upgrade without
> problems for you.
> To fix this do: dpkg --force-overwrite -i /var/ca
Goswin, thanks for the advice. However, I am not smart enough to
understand what it means. The apt-get program will not let me do
anything without resolving the dependency problem that arose because
libc6 was not corretly installed.
Here is what I tried:
% apt-get --reinstall install base-fil
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:01:38PM -0400, Karl Hoppel wrote:
>
> I get the following error trying to upgrade libc6 using sid.
> Any suggestions or help is appreciated?
>
> Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using
> .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> d
"Karl Hoppel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I get the following error trying to upgrade libc6 using sid.
> Any suggestions or help is appreciated?
>
> Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using
> .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> dpkg: error processing
I have some questions about VMware.
I installed it via apt-get in the ia32-chroot part but when I try to
turn on the application,
it complains about /dev/vmmon...
Could you tell me how to install the vmmon and vmnet modules?
Is it not possible to install a 64-bit version of VMware?
Thank you in
Sorry Castillo, that did not solve the problem. I had already removed the ia32
libs from the ld.so.config problem.
The problem still remains, and I still need help:
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using
.../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error
Sorry Castillo, that did not solve the problem. I had already removed the ia32
libs from the ld.so.config problem.
The problem still remains, and I still need help:
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using
.../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error
Hi,
I had the same problem with the chroot (ia32) libraries
I have solved it, by commenting the "chroot i386 system libs" entries in the
/etc/ld.so.conf file. And running "apt-get upgrade -f".
You must do that before uncommenting "chroot i386 system libs entries" and
running ldconfig.
Sorry f
I get the following error trying to upgrade libc6 using sid.
Any suggestions or help is appreciated?
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using
.../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb
(
Le 05.05.2005 17:01:37, nor a écrit :
I got the same problem some months ago with a radeon 9600, so I
installed the ubuntu x.org version.
This didn't solve my problem, so I remove all packages relative to
XFree and then I purge it. And then reinstall them.
After that the problem disappeared, I
I got the same problem some months ago with a radeon 9600, so I
installed the ubuntu x.org version.
This didn't solve my problem, so I remove all packages relative to
XFree and then I purge it. And then reinstall them.
After that the problem disappeared, I don't know what was the reason
but may
A Dijous 05 Maig 2005 16:09, Goswin von Brederlow va escriure:
> Leopold Palomo Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > if I do:
> > indiana:/home/leo# apt-get upgrade
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > The following packages have been kept bac
On (05/05/05 13:23), Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I keep getting segfaults from spamd. Is anyone experiencing similar
> issues?
>
> I am using pure64 sid.
>
> Segfaults looks like this:
>
> spamd[8059]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp
> 7390 error
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> if I do:
> indiana:/home/leo# apt-get upgrade
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following packages have been kept back:
> libgcj-common
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> bind9-host
Am Mittwoch, den 04.05.2005, 15:41 + schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon
> I've an ASUS A8V Deluxe with an ASUS A9250T/D video card.
> I've just updated my BIOS from 1009 to 1011.
>
> After this update, the machine boot fine and the display works in
> cosole mode but while swtiching to X when gdm star
On 05-May-05 13:53, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > retitle 307521 ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Compilation with 'gcc-3.4 -m32'
> > does not work
> > tags 307521 +patch
> > thanks
> >
> > I made some tests and finally found a small patch which makes
Hi,
if I do:
indiana:/home/leo# apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libgcj-common
The following packages will be upgraded:
bind9-host
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to ge
Rafael Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When adding the new mirror. dist-upgrade wants to "upgrade" many installed
> packages... with ones of the same version!
>
> Example:
>
> ike:/home/apt-drink# apt-cache policy ttf-freefont
> ttf-freefont:
> Installed: 20031008-1.1
> Candidate: 200
Hello all
I keep getting segfaults from spamd. Is anyone experiencing similar
issues?
I am using pure64 sid.
Segfaults looks like this:
spamd[8059]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp
7390 error 4
spamd[8060]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp
When adding the new mirror. dist-upgrade wants to "upgrade" many installed
packages... with ones of the same version!
I saw that my /etc/apt/preference was causing unnecessary upgrades, when
pinning to the "wrong" d=NAME .. Maybe only put a=testing or a=unstable
there?!
The "d" obviously changed
On Monday 02 May 2005 16:43, Javier Kohen wrote:
> Hey Uwe,
>
> I know it's been a long time, but I just came across this thread
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/4925 . Somebody found the cause for the
> problem and solved it. Look at the last message in the thread, the rest
> is uninteresting. It turn
When adding the new mirror. dist-upgrade wants to "upgrade" many installed
packages... with ones of the same version!
Example:
ike:/home/apt-drink# apt-cache policy ttf-freefont
ttf-freefont:
Installed: 20031008-1.1
Candidate: 20031008-1.1
Version table:
20031008-1.1 0
500 htt
Emmanuel Doguet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This URL http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/ doesn't
> work anymore. Any idea?
>
> Bye bye.
Wait a few days. CD images will be provided on cdimage.debian.org then.
ftp://alioth.debian.org/pub/debian-amd64/install-images/
or
h
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> retitle 307521 ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Compilation with 'gcc-3.4 -m32'
> does not work
> tags 307521 +patch
> thanks
>
> I made some tests and finally found a small patch which makes ia32-libs
> work again on amd64/sarge without any change to oth
On (05/05/05 12:52), Emmanuel Doguet wrote:
> This URL http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/ doesn't
> work anymore. Any idea?
If you check the mailing list archive for Subject: AMD64 Archive Move
you'll see that the archive is on the move:
As announced earlier the Debian AMD64 arc
Where do I find build status on a package? I.e. why a package is not in
testing, but in unstable .. My googling only found status for other debian
arch's ..
It should now be available.
Thanks!
My question of where I can see status of packages still stands..
/n
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Niklas Ögren wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Where do I find build status on a package? I.e. why a package is not in
> testing, but in unstable .. My googling only found status for other debian
> arch's ..
It should now be available.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
This URL http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/ doesn't
work anymore. Any idea?
Bye bye.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Where do I find build status on a package? I.e. why a package is not in
testing, but in unstable .. My googling only found status for other debian
arch's ..
My problem is that libtasn1-2 is not in debian-amd64/testing, but in
i386/testing .. and packages like libgnutls11 is dependent on tha
retitle 307521 ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Compilation with 'gcc-3.4 -m32'
does not work
tags 307521 +patch
thanks
I made some tests and finally found a small patch which makes ia32-libs
work again on amd64/sarge without any change to other packages, i.e.
without changing the 'gcc-3.4' package f
37 matches
Mail list logo
