Hi All!
Sometimes, after gdm starts and when the login appears, I am not able to
use the keyboard - when I try to enter the username and password - I
press the buttons but nothing appears on the screen. The mouse, however,
works fine. So I can do nothing. The keayboard doesn't react at all - I
Am Mittwoch, den 06.07.2005, 16:16 +0200 schrieb Sven Krahn:
Does anybody (Len?) have an idea what the fps rate for FX 5700LE (with
an AMD64 3200+) should be? Mine is at roughly 1450fps (with default
glxgears), though I remember with an earlier nvidia driver I have it
seen at 2700fps
Hi,
I have same problem after switching to amd64.
GDM( and xdm, kdm) dont find frist free virtual console, and run on
console 7. And at same time on console 7 run getty(i have 9 consoles).
Solution for me is to edit gdm configuration file an set it to run on
first free VC.
in file:
Hi list,
two month ago I bought a new notebook and installed Debian unstable AMD-64
on it. Everything is working fine.
But... I would like to use wlan. I already had a Lancom Card with Prism
Javelin/Xbow chip (not supported) and 32 bit Windows drivers (won't work
with ndiswrapper).
My only
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:10:46AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
That why you read Toleffs proposal for multiarch for debian fo details.
You name packages lib32foo and lib64foo or something non
conflicting. Or you use the multiarch patch for dpkg.
How about mips? They have 3
On Thursday 07 July 2005 03:10 am, Alexandru Cardaniuc wrote:
Hi All!
Sometimes, after gdm starts and when the login appears, I am not able to
use the keyboard - when I try to enter the username and password - I
press the buttons but nothing appears on the screen. The mouse, however,
works
David Wood wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Go to snapshot.debian.net and fish out the right library versions
suse/rh uses, install them, install the same packages (inetd/xinetd)
suse/rh uses and voila. Compatibility.
Even if libraries were the only issue, aren't there
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:26:46PM +0200, Thomas Steffen wrote:
No, for all practical purposes you do not have that. I could not get a
single third part binary to work without a chroot. And recommending a
chroot is just a different way of saying that it is not supported.
Well, Vmware runs
Thomas Steffen wrote:
The better way to do it is to have three (sub)packages: i386, x86_64
and shared. That is a bit like -common and -bin, but the packages
differ only in architecture, not in the name. Imho that is the way to
go.
However, if you look closer, you find that both approaches
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
This has been a long standing behavior of rpm that is now
exploited for use in biarch.
That sounds like there is no special biarch support at all in rpm but
just the support to have multiple versions of a package installed
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hugo Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How? You can't install your two multiarch versions of libvorbis
without a hacked package manager that understands how to do it.
You name packages lib32foo and lib64foo or something non
conflicting. Or you use the
* Bob Proulx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hugo Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How? You can't install your two multiarch versions of libvorbis
without a hacked package manager that understands how to do it.
You name packages lib32foo and lib64foo or
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
I really don't like needing to change the package names to be uniquely
named. I think for multiarch to really work in Debian then dpkg needs
to have a split brain where the architecture specific packages are
tracked separately.
I think he just means for
On 7/7/05, GOMBAS Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, Vmware runs just fine without any kind of chroot.
Yes, I did get the test version of VMware running, but it was not
without issues.
OOo also runs
fine if you just _install_ it in a chroot but call it from the outside
(well, you need to
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:33:39AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Configure scripts have sometimes hardcoded paths to /usr/lib.
And /usr/include. Don't forget that some packages install
architecture-specific header files under /usr/include.
Libtool adds rpath if libraries are not in
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:20:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Also programs don't depend on something like galeon (i hope).
$ apt-cache show liferea-mozilla
[...]
Depends: liferea (= 0.9.1-1), mozilla-browser, [...]
Gabor
--
On Thursday 07 July 2005 15:21, Bob Proulx wrote:
David Wood wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If you don't do that you can also claim that SuSe isn't SuSe
compatible as you can have exactly the same version/package skews
within one distro.
You're right of course -
Hi,
this is not a joke:)
Reading posts about GPG-errors for last apt version, I have launched:
apt-key add keyfile.
At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C
(from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system
becomes unstable (auto key
Can you run a server process inside the 32bit chroot
and access it from other machines? My understanding
of the boundaries of the chroot are a little fuzzy.
I'd like to run the FreeNX server, but it won't work
in amd64 mode because of a missing
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3, which is present in the
Am Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2005 20:06 schrieb antongiulio05:
Hi,
this is not a joke:)
Reading posts about GPG-errors for last apt version, I have launched:
apt-key add keyfile.
At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C
(from 'acpi -V'). Running command above
On 7/7/05, Zachary Rizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you run a server process inside the 32bit chroot
and access it from other machines?
Yes, you can. The chroot may have a different file system, but it sees
exactly the same network.
However, usually you don't have an init process running
--- Thomas Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 7/7/05, Zachary Rizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you run a server process inside the 32bit
chroot
and access it from other machines?
Yes, you can. The chroot may have a different file
system, but it sees
exactly the same network.
The
Hi Hans,
sam to me. I also have an Acer1524WLMI, but everytime I use apt the cooler
begins to run. Don worry, this seems to be o.k. I suppose, apt is using all
the processing time, and so the AMD64-processor is getting hot. Remember, it
so not a mobile-processor.
CPU on my nb runs with
Am Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2005 21:03 schrieb antongiulio05:
Hi Hans,
Hi Gulio,
sam to me. I also have an Acer1524WLMI, but everytime I use apt the
cooler begins to run. Don worry, this seems to be o.k. I suppose, apt is
using all the processing time, and so the AMD64-processor is getting hot.
What do you have for a performance with youre XF86Config-Settings ? I have
about 3220 FPS with glxgears ( in KDE, fvwm is a little bit faster).
I have same performances suppose:
$ glxgears
13341 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2668.200 FPS
15442 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3088.400 FPS
16026 frames in 5.0
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:40:49PM +0200, Alexander Voss wrote:
Hi list,
two month ago I bought a new notebook and installed Debian unstable AMD-64
on it. Everything is working fine.
But... I would like to use wlan. I already had a Lancom Card with Prism
Javelin/Xbow chip (not supported) and
Hi,
I've followed the instructions in the AMD64 howto to setup a chroot jail to
run 32 apps.
When my home directories are available as regular directories under /home
(and /home is bind mounted into the chroot), the users can launch programs
like openoffice.org in the chroot jail.
But on my
Am Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2005 21:35 schrieb antongiulio05:
What do you have for a performance with youre XF86Config-Settings ? I
have about 3220 FPS with glxgears ( in KDE, fvwm is a little bit faster).
I have same performances suppose:
$ glxgears
13341 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2668.200 FPS
Hello
On my new MSI S270 with a Turion, self-compiled kernel 2.6.13-rc2, the
clock (as reported by date, ie gettimeofday call) is drifting
consuderably: in less than 7 hours, the date (an ntpdate is setting it
at boot time) has drifted by -12758 seconds
But the hardware clock (as reported by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everybody,
I would like to know if there is somebody who have succeeded to compile
the module. I download the driver on ati official website :
fglrx64_4_3_0-8.14.13-1.x86_64.rpm
When i tun make.sh in /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod I've got this
Le Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:52:49PM +0200, Sylvain Archenault écrivait/wrote:
I would like to know if there is somebody who have succeeded to compile
the module. I download the driver on ati official website :
fglrx64_4_3_0-8.14.13-1.x86_64.rpm
When i tun make.sh in
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:52:49PM +0200, Sylvain Archenault wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everybody,
I would like to know if there is somebody who have succeeded to compile
the module. I download the driver on ati official website :
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:52:12PM +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
Hello
On my new MSI S270 with a Turion, self-compiled kernel 2.6.13-rc2, the
clock (as reported by date, ie gettimeofday call) is drifting
consuderably: in less than 7 hours, the date (an ntpdate is setting it
at boot
On 7/7/05, Rik Theys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But on my production system, the home directories are automounted under /home.
Simply bind mounting /home in the chroot does not work: the home directories
are not available in the chroot :(.
Is there any way to fix this? Would it be possible
I tried your settings in XF86Config-4. Sad, they do not work, same as before.
Monitor gets bright, whren switching to konsole. It seems to be a hardware
problem. Nevertheless, with your settings, the screen was not so nice as mine
(my personal meaning :)) ) So, maybe, you will try my one ?
Hey,
I have recently installed ssh but am having some problems. I can ssh from
computer2 to my server but can not ssh back the other way, server to
computer2. I get the following when using ssh -v
OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 Debian-8.sarge.4, OpenSSL 0.9.7e 25 Oct 2004
debug1: Reading configuration data
On 7/7/05, Jamie Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of curiosity what are your values for
/proc/driver/nvidia/version
/proc/driver/nvidia/agp/card
/proc/driver/nvidia/agp/host-bridge
/proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status
That may provide a clue as to why your performance seems a little slow
Good
Am Donnerstag 07 Juli 2005 23:00 schrieb Basile STARYNKEVITCH:
Le Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:52:49PM +0200, Sylvain Archenault écrivait/wrote:
I would like to know if there is somebody who have succeeded to compile
the module. I download the driver on ati official website :
Hi Sylvain,
El jue, 07-07-2005 a las 22:52 +0200, Sylvain Archenault escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everybody,
I would like to know if there is somebody who have succeeded to compile
the module. I download the driver on ati official website :
HI...
I hope someone can give me
a simple answer. Will 32 bit applications run onSarge AMD64
I just completing a AMD64
desktop and am trying to decide between amd64 and
i386.
Thanks in advance for your
help.
Bernie
Adam Stiles wrote:
As I've said before, binary compatibility is irrelevant.
[...]
Source compatibility is all that really matters, and there are
enough examples around to show that this is entirely achievable.
[...]
The only reason why you would ever want to be able to run a binary
not
Zachary Rizer wrote:
--- Thomas Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you can. The chroot may have a different file
system, but it sees exactly the same network.
Agreed. This works fine.
The server doesn't seem to want to run in the chroot,
or if it's running, I can't get to it from
Rik Theys wrote:
I've followed the instructions in the AMD64 howto to setup a chroot jail to
run 32 apps.
When my home directories are available as regular directories under /home
(and /home is bind mounted into the chroot), the users can launch programs
like openoffice.org in the chroot
Bernie Betlach wrote:
I hope someone can give me a simple answer. Will 32 bit applications
run on Sarge AMD64
If you also install a 32-bit environment in addition to the 64-bit
environment then yes they will. There are two typical methods for
installing a 32-bit environment. One is
Hello list,
I am writing to inform that with a little tweaking I was able to
compile, start and exit asterisk pbx on Debian-amd64.
I am also writing to ask for any criticism or pointers of things I
have done wrong.
My hardware consists of the following:
Tyan Transport GX28
(uses Tyan
Nicholas P. Mueller wrote:
I am also writing to ask for any criticism or pointers of things I
have done wrong.
Since you asked *and* you replied to _my_ message I am compelled to
reply. I posted a follow-up message with a subject Simple
Question... 32bit compatibility. You took that message
46 matches
Mail list logo
