Grahame White ha scritto:
>Looking back a bit I see you were asking about a clean way to install the
>newer drivers. I couldn't, however, find any reply. How did you install
>them in the end?
>
>
If you want you can try my nvidia-update:
http://v0n0.altervista.org/
--
Alessandro Dal Grande
S
Ken Bloom ha scritto:
>Ubuntu has already done Oo.o2. Any chance it would work if you just put
>their Oo.o and dependancies into your repository. I've been hoping
>someone would do that. Then you can take advantage of any bugfixes the make.
>
>
I know Ubuntu has it, they publish it in their base
Lars Schimmer ha scritto:
> But with openoffice2 - I think the "official team" is working on it to
> get a full 64bit aware version of it. As the 32bit is working in
> unstable i386.
You're right, but since I need OO2 now and don't want chroot neither
crappy OO1 I'm trying to get it work with 32b
apparently the source debs are in the mirrors now
nevertheless, check out
http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/
youll need to add the source deb lines,
then apt source the nvidia-graphics-drivers
then dpkg-buildpackage
install them all
then go m-a the kernel module as before
i can give you more d
v0n0 wrote:
> Hi, I've "repacked" some 32bit libraries for Debian amd64 system, and
> Skype and Wine. Skype is running fine, Wine executes, but gives (me)
> error on some folders. These are very experimental, but since they don't
> mess system, you may want to give it a try! ;)
> More infos at:
> h
>
> On the other hand I have NEVER used a + in the append-to-version and I
> am not sure it is even supposed to be allowed, it certainly is
> discouraged to use + in the version or packagename in general. I always
> just have the append-to-version use dashes between things.
>
>From make-kpkg man
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 19:28 +, debianista.deb wrote:
> hello
>
>I'm run the quake4 for linux and it gives me this:
>
> Verifying archive integrity... All good.
> Uncompressing Quake
> IV..
On Saturday 05 November 2005 21:10, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> try the 1.0-7676 driver
>
> Dean
>
> Grahame White wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 November 2005 20:21, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> >>try drviver as 'nvidia' not 'nv'
> >
> > Sorry my mistake. I did try it as nvidia but I cut and paste the
> > previou
Hi.
> >
> > Well, maybe not a good idea for the swap partition(s)...
>
> Why not? Speed issues?
> If the hard disk with your swap crashes, wouldn't a RAIDed swap avoid the
> system to crash?
>
Yes, why not? ;-)
It seemed like a good idea after all, and I've just done it:
# swapon -s
Filename
>
> Right indeed: a new kernel with
>
> # CONFIG_FB is not set
>
> and no blank screen problem anymore.
>
No, no, no, that's not it. It worked once (I think).
Then not. I had to plug the S-VHS cable back in. :-{
I'll have to go and ask on the nVidia forum...
Gilles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
try the 1.0-7676 driver
Dean
Grahame White wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2005 20:21, Dean Hamstead wrote:
try drviver as 'nvidia' not 'nv'
Sorry my mistake. I did try it as nvidia but I cut and paste the previous
email after I'd changed it back to nv to get a working gui.
So no nvidia
On Nov 5, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Gilles wrote:
I have a two-disk system. I'd like to create two RAID1s for this
system. One of the RAID1s would exist across a /boot partition with
the bootable flag set on each disk.
[snip]
Is there any way to achieve what I want to do (preferably from the
insta
On Saturday 05 November 2005 20:21, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> try drviver as 'nvidia' not 'nv'
Sorry my mistake. I did try it as nvidia but I cut and paste the previous
email after I'd changed it back to nv to get a working gui.
So no nvidia didn't work
Grahame
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
try drviver as 'nvidia' not 'nv'
dean
Grahame White wrote:
I installed the nvidia kernel module using :
#m-a i-a -t nvidia
Next I installed nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-glx
After that I changed the driver in /etc/X11/xorg.conf from nv to nvidia and
commented out the Load "dri" line.
I
Hello,
After a net install I ended up with an apparently fully operational
system. But my fstab file contains only:
# UNCONFIGURED FSTAB FOR BASE SYSTEM
I (normally) have / on /dev/sda2 and /boot on /dev/sda3. A "df" tells me
that I have only /dev and /dev/shm mounted as tmpfs filesystems.
hello
I'm run the quake4 for linux and it gives me this:
Verifying archive integrity... All good.
Uncompressing Quake
IV.
Samedi 5 novembre 2005, 19:37:37 CET, Gilles a écrit :
> >
> > It is certainly possible to have everything on RAID.
>
> Well, maybe not a good idea for the swap partition(s)...
Why not? Speed issues?
If the hard disk with your swap crashes, wouldn't a RAIDed swap avoid the
system to crash?
--
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 10:46:26 -0600, "Thomas F. O'Connell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 5, 2005, at 8:49 AM, Austin (Ozz) Denyer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 20:54:16 -0600, "Thomas F. O'Connell"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Has anyone had any difficulty getting networking
> > Could these be the cause of the strange behaviour:
> >
> > CONFIG_FB=y
> > CONFIG_FB_CFB_FILLRECT=y
> > CONFIG_FB_CFB_COPYAREA=y
> > CONFIG_FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT=y
> > CONFIG_FB_SOFT_CURSOR=y
> > CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y
> > CONFIG_FB_VESA=y
>
> Certainly possible. The nvidia driver is not compa
>
> It is certainly possible to have everything on RAID.
Well, maybe not a good idea for the swap partition(s)...
Gilles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To continue this thread a bit, I'm curious whether the current state
> of boot loaders for Debian under amd64 is such that it is
> theoretically possible to configure LVM on software RAID on a multi-
> disk system without needing an isolated un-RAIDed /boot partition on
> one of the disks
I am trying to resume an AMD64 laptop from Suspend to RAM, and the laptop
seems to wake up fine (I can type commands and they get executed), but the
LCD stays black. So I read about the various options to reinitialize the VGA,
which were:
1. kernel boot options: acpi=s3_sleep, acpi=s3_mode, pci=
To continue this thread a bit, I'm curious whether the current state
of boot loaders for Debian under amd64 is such that it is
theoretically possible to configure LVM on software RAID on a multi-
disk system without needing an isolated un-RAIDed /boot partition on
one of the disks.
I have
On Nov 5, 2005, at 11:12 AM, Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
On Nov 5, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
On Nov 5, 2005, at 8:49 AM, Austin (Ozz) Denyer wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 20:54:16 -0600, "Thomas F. O'Connell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I finally made it through the insta
On Nov 5, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
On Nov 5, 2005, at 8:49 AM, Austin (Ozz) Denyer wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 20:54:16 -0600, "Thomas F. O'Connell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I finally made it through the installation process (see nearby
thread about software RAID, LV
On Nov 5, 2005, at 8:49 AM, Austin (Ozz) Denyer wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 20:54:16 -0600, "Thomas F. O'Connell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I finally made it through the installation process (see nearby
thread about software RAID, LVM, and LILO), and lo and behold:
networking isn't working.
Gerhard Gaußling wrote:
> But I'm pretty sure you don't use PTOptimizer, because the source code was
||--^ I meant PTStitcher of course!
> never published and opened. There are only 32bit binarys on the net.
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.misc.ptx/41
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
v0n0 wrote:
> You can upgrade safely lib32gcc1, it's only one library! It doesn't
> affect your gcc in any manner.
Ok, skype works :-)
But with openoffice2 - I think the "official team" is working on it to
get a full 64bit aware version of it. As th
Lars Schimmer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gerhard Gaußling wrote:
>> Is there a way to have /usr/lib32/libpng.so.2 working without chroot?
>
> Why using 32bit versions?
> libpano12 - panorama tools
> libpano12-dev - panorama tools - development files
>
> Are avai
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 20:54:16 -0600, "Thomas F. O'Connell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So I finally made it through the installation process (see nearby
> thread about software RAID, LVM, and LILO), and lo and behold:
> networking isn't working. The primary ethernet card (of three) in
> thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerhard Gaußling wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got a problem to run 32bit panotools on my amd64 breezy box.
> I linked successfully 32bit libpano12 and libtiff.so.3, but I'm not able to
> link libpng.so.2.
> But anyway: I want to know why it fails to link /u
Lars Schimmer ha scritto:
> Thx for the work, BUT:
> apt-cache policy lib32gcc1
> lib32gcc1:
> Installed: 3.4.3-13
> Candidate: 3.4.3-13
> Version Table:
> 1:4.0.2-2 0
> 150 http://debian.inode.at unstable/main Packages
> 300 http://debian.inode.at testing/main Packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
v0n0 wrote:
> Hi, I've "repacked" some 32bit libraries for Debian amd64 system, and
> Skype and Wine. Skype is running fine, Wine executes, but gives (me)
> error on some folders. These are very experimental, but since they don't
> mess system, you may
Hello,
I got a problem to run 32bit panotools on my amd64 breezy box.
I linked successfully 32bit libpano12 and libtiff.so.3, but I'm not able to
link libpng.so.2.
$ ldd PTStitcher linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libpano12.so => /lib32/libpano12.so (0x5558f000)
libc.so.6
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:22:49AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> The problem now seems to be that rootskel-locale still seems to
> exist in testing for some reason. It's unclear to me why it
> still exists. This is causing the monolithic target to fail to
> build because it can't find the locale
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:20:03AM +0200, kohzak wrote:
> You mean that i should have
>
> /dev/md0/home fd defaults0 2
>
> and not
>
> /dev/md0/home xfs defaults0 2
No, XFS is correct. But what does the partition table say?
I installed the nvidia kernel module using :
#m-a i-a -t nvidia
Next I installed nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-glx
After that I changed the driver in /etc/X11/xorg.conf from nv to nvidia and
commented out the Load "dri" line.
I then rebooted which went fine, until kdm started to load at which
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:02:37PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> You know, amd64 is the only arch to build the monolithic target by
> default. I think that this is because it used to be hard to get
> businesscard CDs for amd64, but we build them now. And also there used
> to be the mirror selection
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem with miboot is that there are 200 or so m68k instructions in the
> boot sector, which have not been changed since over 10 years probably, and
> probably nobody at appple even remembers them, and thus we are not shipping
> miboot even in non-fre
Hi,
does anybody know if Gnome 2.12.1 and Anjuta 2.0.1 will be included in
"unstable" repositories?
Thanks,
Giulio
40 matches
Mail list logo
