On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:23:40AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 08:41:28PM +, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> > Same thing, after an update a few days ago, firefox segfaults.
> >
> > However, If i run firefox from the 32bit chroot and execute 64bit
> > firefox while the
Hi,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you mean; anything that does compile on amd64 directly
> from source should already be in the archive?
I'm not sure it's a good criteria. ;-)
Have you tried OpenOffice for AMD64 ? It's definitely compiling but... :)
Regards
--
Emmanuel Fleury
E
Hello!
The packages kcpuload, knetload and kaquarium require the lib
kdelibs4c2, but kdelibs4c2a is the new name of the lib!
I reportet it already to the Debian BTS, but they telled me that it's
the false address and i have to report it to the amd64-team!
Lari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Ken Bloom wrote:
>Did you remember to include non-free and contrib in your sources.list?
>Most of the packages you mention would be found there.
>
>
Yes,... of course ;-)
>BTW, AMD64 is very almost an official port. It is autobuilding packages
>as they are uploaded to Debian, so any package tha
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>>Uhmm,.. well at least my aptitude doesn't show me some packages which
>>have been available to me under i386,...
>>scilab, mtr/mtr-tiny, unrar nonfree-unrar, rar,... and there are surely
>>more ;-)
>
> ... I've just quickly bootstrapped an i386 deb seems that a
This fixed the problem for me by installing version 8178. Just add
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable/amd64/
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable/all/
to your sources. Then:
apt-get update
m-a gave me some problems so I did:
rm -rf /usr/src/modules
>Uhmm,.. well at least my aptitude doesn't show me some packages which
>have been available to me under i386,...
>scilab, mtr/mtr-tiny, unrar nonfree-unrar, rar,... and there are surely
>more ;-)
>
>
... I've just quickly bootstrapped an i386 deb seems that at least
scilab is missing there,
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 01:52:19PM -0900, Greg Madden wrote:
>
> I use debian.csail.mit.edu.
> >
Sorry to sound terminally stupid, but I don't know how to translate a
URL like
http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian-amd64/debian-amd64/pool/main/
into a deb line for /etc/apt/sources.list
And how does
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:50:22PM +, Jo Shields wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I haven't accepted the new AMD-64 box the computer store has
> >built for me, because I can't get it to run in 64-bit mode.
> >
> >I provided the sarge net-install CD's for both AMD-64 and the older
> >386
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>There are no promises.. but work seems to be progressing.
>
>
Who is making the decisions? I'd like to follow the developments :-)
>>we wouldn't have to create packages from source There are still lots
>>of programms that are not available in amd64 (I still miss scil
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 01:50:47AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I just wonder if there is anything new about unstable amd64 becoming
> official? I think that would be a big gift to all of us,... especially
There are no promises.. but work seems to be progressing.
> we wouldn't have to
Hi.
I just wonder if there is anything new about unstable amd64 becoming
official? I think that would be a big gift to all of us,... especially
we wouldn't have to create packages from source There are still lots
of programms that are not available in amd64 (I still miss scilab,
mtr,... newest
I have been wrestling with a Ubuntu 64bit problem and so far have found
> no one who knows the answer.
> I have a 1 gig ram, K8V SE Deluxe Socket 754 with tons or power, and
> with the Ubunutu 64 bit both Live CD and the Install CD I am unable to
> allow the machine to go into its sleep or time-out
On Sunday 15 January 2006 13:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I haven't accepted the new AMD-64 box the computer store has
> built for me, because I can't get it to run in 64-bit mode.
>
> I provided the sarge net-install CD's for both AMD-64 and the older
> 386 architectures.
>
> The netinstall for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't accepted the new AMD-64 box the computer store has
built for me, because I can't get it to run in 64-bit mode.
I provided the sarge net-install CD's for both AMD-64 and the older
386 architectures.
The netinstall for AMD64 went fine up to a point (except it w
I haven't accepted the new AMD-64 box the computer store has
built for me, because I can't get it to run in 64-bit mode.
I provided the sarge net-install CD's for both AMD-64 and the older
386 architectures.
The netinstall for AMD64 went fine up to a point (except it was 30 times
as slow
as the
Hi
I installed kde 3.5 on amd64 from SID. And when I want to login as a
user I get this error (with root everyting is ok) in
/home/$USER/.xsession-errors. First login in kde by the user working
fine, but the next one have this error. And /tmp/.ICE-unix is owned by root.
I know it's unstable, bu
Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
Same thing, after an update a few days ago, firefox segfaults.
However, If i run firefox from the 32bit chroot and execute 64bit
firefox while the 32bit one is open, no segfault occurs and firefox runs
ok. Very odd
Andrei
Hi!
This behaviour is easy to explain;
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 08:41:28PM +, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> Same thing, after an update a few days ago, firefox segfaults.
>
> However, If i run firefox from the 32bit chroot and execute 64bit
> firefox while the 32bit one is open, no segfault occurs and firefox runs
> ok. Very odd
Not
Same thing, after an update a few days ago, firefox segfaults.
However, If i run firefox from the 32bit chroot and execute 64bit
firefox while the 32bit one is open, no segfault occurs and firefox runs
ok. Very odd
Andrei
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 22:34 +0100, Thomas Koeppen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP
Hans ha scritto:
Hello all,
is there something known with malfunctions with GTK-Libs ? Since my last
update, all Programs usinfg this (i.e. xchat, synaptics and a few others)
have trouble to show the fonts. This behaviour is only in amd64-systems. My
32-bit-system with the same versions is r
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:50:18AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> (Please CC me)
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know if the amd64 autobuilder periodically attempts
> to build packages that used to fail to build. It seems to me
> that it is waiting for new uploads only.
No it doesn't. If it failed it fa
Jérôme Marant wrote:
(Please CC me)
Hi,
I'd like to know if the amd64 autobuilder periodically attempts
to build packages that used to fail to build. It seems to me
that it is waiting for new uploads only.
Currently, it seems that KDE 3.5 is still not completely built
on amd64 and I bet that k
sigi ha scritto:
Try to add the following lines into the file .gtkrc-mine in your
homedir (the empty file should already exist, I think):
style "user-font"
{
fontset="-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1"
}
widget_class "*" style "user-font"
after that tiny fonts were
Hello all,
is there something known with malfunctions with GTK-Libs ? Since my last
update, all Programs usinfg this (i.e. xchat, synaptics and a few others)
have trouble to show the fonts. This behaviour is only in amd64-systems. My
32-bit-system with the same versions is running clean.
If t
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:21:34AM +0100, Thomas Koeppen wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:28:28AM +0100, Thomas Koeppen wrote:
> >>i think, if any user do an upgrade, packages should be ever consistent,
> >>packages with unmet dependencies should not uploaded to reposit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:28:28AM +0100, Thomas Koeppen wrote:
>
>>after new update/upgrade gome-applets and gnome-panel can be installed on my
>>box.
>>
>
> [..]
>
>
>>i think, if any user do an upgrade, packages should b
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:28:28AM +0100, Thomas Koeppen wrote:
> after new update/upgrade gome-applets and gnome-panel can be installed on my
> box.
>
[..]
> i think, if any user do an upgrade, packages should be ever consistent,
> packages with unmet dependencies should not uploaded to reposit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:37:14PM +0100, Thomas Koeppen wrote:
>
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>[sid] gnome-applets: Depends: gnome-panel (>= 2.12.1-1) but 2.10.2-1 is to be
>>installed
>
>
> GNOME 2
29 matches
Mail list logo
