Hi again.
By having a look at syslog after a freeze I discovered that the kernel was
oopsing:
Jan 28 09:05:16 phi kernel: skb_over_panic: text:8876790c len:1 put:1
head:810022437000 data:810122437000 tail:810122437001
end:810022437600 dev:
Jan 28 09:05:16 phi kernel: --
Deepak Kizhakkedath Mana
Consultant - HCLT - BEMS ID# 1587365
FTCS Redevelopment
Phone: 206-655-2391
Thierry LARMIER kiedys napisal:
> 2d solution
> # mount /dev/hda3 /mnt/root
> # chroot /mnt/root > I have an error here
> # grub-install /dev/hda
> # exit
>
>
> I think it's not working because knoppix run in 32bit.
Yes, it works because of that. Use 64bit live system. I don't know
zzz haha kiedys napisal:
> If I have a HT cpu, should I use smp kernel image?
Yes, you should if you want two logical cpus
--
Registered Linux User 369908
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helge Hafting wrote:
> The fact that you _need_ a raid driver in window is a strong hint that the
> raid is implemented in software - a hw raid controller can be made to look
> like a single disk on a standard controller - both linux and windows can
> then handle it without special drivers.
Most
Hi,
Today I installed amd64 on a IBM x346. Everything works fine, except the
hostraid. Anyway, I prefer mdadm, so I left the RAID unconfigured.
When I started to test hot swap by removing one HD I realized that the
aic79xx module seems to crash sometimes. In the worst case the whole
kernel crashed
Hi,
> I am getting the following error, when I use the fakeroot (version 1.5.6) on
> AMD opteron machine.
>
> "error while loading shared libraries: libfakeroot.so.0: cannot open shared
> object file: No shuch file or directory."
>
> Can you please suggest a way out for this problem.
You probab
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hi
>I am trying to run a program using USB hardware. I added the following
> lines to /etc/udev/permissions.rules:
> SUBSYSTEM=="usb_device",GROUP="plugdev", \
> SYSFS{idVendor}=="0abf", SY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ha! Yes, my mistake. Apparently the package debian-archive-keyring was
already installed on my amd64 (HP Pavilion zv6000 series - zv6100 in
bios, zv6201cl on paper label), but it just popped up in the i386
mirror. My error. fgd.
J. Paul Bissonnette wr
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 01:57:59AM +0200, Rami Saarinen wrote:
> On Thursday 26 January 2006 15:21, Andrew Syrewicze wrote:
> > I wouldn't rule out the possibility of your processor getting to hot. The
> > newcastle cores aren't as solid as venice cores, and i hear they run a
> > little hotter too.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:50:10AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Thomas Steffen wrote:
>
> >On 1/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>So, as I understand it, the following stuff would need to go into the
> >>32-bit chroot (assuming one wants/needs these things):
> >>
>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:39:09AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Hi; thanks for your reply. No need to cc me; I read the list.
>
> Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:34:13AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> So, as I understand it, the following stuff would need t
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:51:01PM +0100, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> Ok, this is funny. I doublechecked some things on my system, and here's a
> couple of useful outputs:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
> DEVICE partitions
> ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid1 num-devices=2
> UUID=9dae3f6
If I have a HT cpu, should I use smp kernel image?
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.66GHz
stepping: 1
cpu MHz : 2661.169
cache size : 1024 KB
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:38:08PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
> I think that's all wrong. The flags are more or less a decoding of the
> CPUID result codes.
>
> As for HT, my dad's old laptop 1.7GHz P4-mobile (Northwood) has the ht
> flag, but it sure as hell doesn't have two logical CPUs. I l
"michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When a server is completely idle, shouldn't the load average be 0.00 ?
> and only showing 1 total tasks running? This one flips between 2 and 1 all
> the time. (at idle times)
You don't have any daemons running?
> Is there any other way to figure out what
I just installed debian-amd64, and I've added my motherboard
(GA-7VT890-9) to the Mainboards wiki.debian.org page, since it wasn't
there already. No problems, except a couple of odd spurious warnings
from ReiserFS which don't seem to have had any effect, and haven't
happened since.. hmm. NB I put i
hello,
Have amd64 sarge installed with a 2.6.15 em64t kernel.
I was noticing that top was showing some processes running and thought it was
a little high. I took a copy of the top command and pasted below.
This server was sitting doing nothing at that time, but shows I have 2
running.
When a ser
Hi
I am trying to run a program using USB hardware. I added the following
lines to /etc/udev/permissions.rules:
SUBSYSTEM=="usb_device",GROUP="plugdev", \
SYSFS{idVendor}=="0abf", SYSFS{idProduct}=="3370"
Since then I have upgraded udev to 0.82-1 and reastarted
I know it is in the i32 repository, have used it with the amd64 yet.
Just got a amd64, haven't had much time to get the 64 bit OS running.
Sorry for all the posting, I hit Reply to all by mistake, try not to do
that again, I hope. :)
Fielder George Dowding wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSA
Hi,
I'm trying to debug why 'fmit' is so unstable on my unstable amd64
box. Backtrace is looking suspiciously too qt to be application
specific. Anyone seen this kind of backtrace recently? At first sight
it looks like some allocator bug.
[21:53:00]dancer64:trunk> gdb /usr/bin/fmit
GNU gdb 6.4
Keith Ballantyne wrote:
Hi,
I recently bought an Asus A8N-E mobo and AMD64 3800+ CPU. I then
bought RAM, a case, and an ATI 300-based PCI Express 16 video card. I
used netinstall sarge and managed to install 32-bit using the 2.6
kernel (as the 2.4 kernel wouldn't recognize my network card)
Keith Ballantyne wrote:
Hi,
I recently bought an Asus A8N-E mobo and AMD64 3800+ CPU. I then
bought RAM, a case, and an ATI 300-based PCI Express 16 video card. I
used netinstall sarge and managed to install 32-bit using the 2.6
kernel (as the 2.4 kernel wouldn't recognize my network card)
Thomas Steffen wrote:
On 1/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, as I understand it, the following stuff would need to go into the
32-bit chroot (assuming one wants/needs these things):
- Sun's J2RE
- OpenOffice
- Flash
- RealPlayer/Helix/whatever
- win32codecs + other
24 matches
Mail list logo
