Working now
thanks!!! :)
El Lunes, 3 de Abril de 2006 23:41, Sylvain Archenault escribió:
> Well maybe, it comes from a problem in the dchroot package. I have
> problem with open office and the same with skype. Downgrading to
> login_4.0.15-1 fix it. A fix should be available in a few days.
>
> M
On (03/04/06 20:20), Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
> i've been using skype through a chroot for months, with an icon in the
> desktop with the associated command:
>
> /usr/bin/dchroot -d "/home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype"
>
> but now it has stopped working:
>
> /usr/bin/dchroot -d "/home/us
Well maybe, it comes from a problem in the dchroot package. I have
problem with open office and the same with skype. Downgrading to
login_4.0.15-1 fix it. A fix should be available in a few days.
My post : http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2006/04/msg00020.html
Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> I have just installed Openoffice2 in my 64-bit-system from
>
> ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/debian/oo64/
*If* you want amd64 native debs, take the ones from
people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.0.2/experimental.
I will try to keep it up to date with package
Hi,
i've been using skype through a chroot for months, with an icon in the
desktop with the associated command:
/usr/bin/dchroot -d "/home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype"
but now it has stopped working:
/usr/bin/dchroot -d "/home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype"
(ia32) /home/user/dow
El Lunes, 3 de Abril de 2006 19:45, Arthur Tupinambá escribió:
> Hello people, everything ok?
>
> Im new in this list... i hope here we can change some expertise :)
>
> I have a doubt, that can be a doubt of another AMD64 users (*I googled
> this and did not find anything*) Can use AMD64 port and
Hello people, everything ok?
Im new in this list... i hope here we can change some expertise :)
I have a doubt, that can be a doubt of another AMD64 users (*I googled
this and did not find anything*) Can use AMD64 port and install
packages from another repository that is not from AMD64 ?
Som
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hello all,
I have just installed Openoffice2 in my 64-bit-system from
ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/debian/oo64/
Yes, ist is running, and yes, I know, it is not officially supported, and yes,
I know, it has still some bugs. Anyway, it works, but with a slight proble
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:30:20PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Another way to solve this -- sort of oldfashioned but very elegant -- is
to use labels. Say you want to label drives tv0 to tv2:
* ext2 and ext3: e2label or "tune2fs -L tv0 /dev/sde1"
* XFS: "xfs_admin
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hello all,
in my sources.list is still the following entry, which was some time ago
necessary, to get some 32-bit-applications (i.e. openoffice) running (thanks
to Goswin von Brederlow).
Is this entry still necessary ? This is the entry:
--
# Goswins
deb file:
On (03/04/06 16:50), Sylvain Archenault wrote:
> Thanks to a private message, I found the solution, I needed to downgrade
> to login_4.0.15-1
> (http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2006/03/23/debian/pool/main/s/shadow/login_4.0.15-1_i386.deb).
>
> Have a nice day :)
Thanks Sylvain
I was bitten
Thanks to a private message, I found the solution, I needed to downgrade
to login_4.0.15-1
(http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2006/03/23/debian/pool/main/s/shadow/login_4.0.15-1_i386.deb).
Have a nice day :)
Sylvain Archenault wrote:
Hello,
Since this morning, I can't run OpenOffice in my c
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:30:20PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
> Another way to solve this -- sort of oldfashioned but very elegant -- is
> to use labels. Say you want to label drives tv0 to tv2:
>
> * ext2 and ext3: e2label or "tune2fs -L tv0 /dev/sde1"
> * XFS: "xfs_admin -L tv1 /dev/sda1" (m
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:52:36AM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> notice that for budgetary reasons i am setting up raid1 with a couple of
> low-cost 300GB SATA hds.
People have been reporting problems lately having trouble getting the
Linux kernel to tell which SATA disk is which. Could hav
Hello all,
I have just installed Openoffice2 in my 64-bit-system from
ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/debian/oo64/
Yes, ist is running, and yes, I know, it is not officially supported, and yes,
I know, it has still some bugs. Anyway, it works, but with a slight problem:
Openoffice can not fi
Hello,
Since this morning, I can't run OpenOffice in my chroot. Here is the
output :
dchroot -c ia32 -d -q oowriter
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 7: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 9: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 11: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: oowriter: li
Hello all,
in my sources.list is still the following entry, which was some time ago
necessary, to get some 32-bit-applications (i.e. openoffice) running (thanks
to Goswin von Brederlow).
Is this entry still necessary ? This is the entry:
--
# Goswins
deb file:///var/lib/amd64-archive/
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:52:36AM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> thank you. to summarize, from the point of view of security (i mean security
> to save the os, not the data, which can be easily saved elsewhewere) is that
> better to make raid1 (amd64 dual) through linux-debian software or to
thank you. to summarize, from the point of view of security (i mean security
to save the os, not the data, which can be easily saved elsewhewere) is that
better to make raid1 (amd64 dual) through linux-debian software or to make
hardware raid1 ? (as far as i understand even hardware raid1 involv
19 matches
Mail list logo
