On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:34:03AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:51:47PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > We have received two requests for the inclusion of mpt* modules for AMD64
> > in Debian Installer. The first is listed below, the second is #367634.
>
>
everytime usefull commands: dmesg and mount with no parametersOn 6/2/06, Lennart Sorensen <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:29:25PM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Where to find directions for mounting devices with amd64 debian testing kernel> 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp? Of course i
Hello,
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:51:47PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> We have received two requests for the inclusion of mpt* modules for AMD64
> in Debian Installer. The first is listed below, the second is #367634.
I am looking at it now, sorry for the delay.
the daily d-i images do not build
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:29:25PM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Where to find directions for mounting devices with amd64 debian testing kernel
> 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp? Of course if different from 32 testing.
It is exactly the same as on i386. That is kind of the point of debian.
Every archite
Where to find directions for mounting devices with amd64 debian testing kernel
2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp? Of course if different from 32 testing.
I am asking that because I inserted a card reader writer (with card inside)
into USB and got it recognized without doing anything else.
I was unused at th
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:20:33AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
>>First, please don't top post. Second, it is generally not necessary to
>>CC everyone involved in the coversation. We all read the list.
>
>
> Assuming everyone reads the list is not a valid assump
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:24:49AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:57:09AM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> > i dont think anyone would say that the amd64 port is horendously unstable.
> >
> > as a server, most of your standard software is 64bit friendly
> > and 64bit is
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:20:33AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> First, please don't top post. Second, it is generally not necessary to
> CC everyone involved in the coversation. We all read the list.
Assuming everyone reads the list is not a valid assumption. People post
questions at time
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 15:36:25 +0200, Kompar Krisztian wrote
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to get more information about AMD64 port of debain
> sarge. The stability and reliability is very important for me. For
> this time only official i386 release of sarge are runing on my
> servers. Now I want t
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:57:09AM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> i dont think anyone would say that the amd64 port is horendously unstable.
>
> as a server, most of your standard software is 64bit friendly
> and 64bit is by no means new ground for the linux kernel.
>
> for example, you shouldnt s
Francesco Pietra wrote:
> About ram, with:
>
> amd64 debian testing
> linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
> at the moment 2GB ram
>
> when, in few days, it will be upgraded to 8GB ram, is that kernel OK? If not,
> is any suitable one available from debian repositories, or should I
> recompile th
Michael D Schleif wrote:
>
>>Yes, better avoiding mixing.
>
>
> Please, list members in the know, correct me if I have reached a
> misunderstanding with this.
>
> amd64 repositories for sarge ARE actually 64-bit ports.
>
> amd64 repositories for sarge are kept separate from standard debian
> r
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:10:32PM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> About ram, with:
>
> amd64 debian testing
> linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
> at the moment 2GB ram
>
> when, in few days, it will be upgraded to 8GB ram, is that kernel OK? If not,
> is any suitable one available from debian
Please, do NOT address messages to me; unless there is a very good
reason to take this OFF list.
* Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:02:15:56:55+0200] scribed:
> Yes, better avoiding mixing.
Please, list members in the know, correct me if I have reached a
misunderstanding with this.
About ram, with:
amd64 debian testing
linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
at the moment 2GB ram
when, in few days, it will be upgraded to 8GB ram, is that kernel OK? If not,
is any suitable one available from debian repositories, or should I
recompile the kernel and which CONFIG?
Thank you
fran
i dont think anyone would say that the amd64 port is horendously unstable.
as a server, most of your standard software is 64bit friendly
and 64bit is by no means new ground for the linux kernel.
for example, you shouldnt see any 64bit specific issues from...
apache.
mysql.
postgresql.
perl.
exim
Alexander =>
* Alexander Meis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:02:16:45:27+0200] scribed:
> Hi,
> the netinst image i found at
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta2/amd64/iso-cd/
> does not work, when it comes to the installation the sources are taken
> form cdrom where there are not on.
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:33:21PM +0200, Kompar Krisztian wrote:
> Yes, I have read it that I can use maximum 64Gb memory using PAE. But lot of
> people wrote that 10-15% CPU time need for this. Is it true? Uptime
> is very critical :) that is why I didn't try it, yet.
PAE is slower than direct m
Hi,
the netinst image i found at
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta2/amd64/iso-cd/
does not work, when it comes to the installation the sources are taken
form cdrom where there are not on.
Can someone tell me where to find an working image?
thanks
alex
begin:vcard
fn:Alexander Meis
n
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:05:27AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> If all you have a need for is to access more than 4 GB of RAM, then just
> recompile your kernel with CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y.
Yes, I have read it that I can use maximum 64Gb memory using PAE. But lot of
people wrote that 10-15% CPU
On Friday 02 June 2006 11:31, Craig Hagerman wrote:
> For some reason I just lost my cdrom / dvd drive (same). I did an
> update and upgrade, burned a CD in k3b and all was working well. I
> came home to find that the computer had crashed hard - no mouse, no
> keyboard, couldn't log in remotely, no
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 09:21:53AM -0500, helices wrote:
> * Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:02:09:46:10-0400] scribed:
> > On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> > > in earlier days apt-get dist-upgrade did automatically upgrade the
> > > kernel,
> > > t
* Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:02:09:46:10-0400] scribed:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> > in earlier days apt-get dist-upgrade did automatically upgrade the kernel,
> > too.
> >
> > This behavior is no more. When did this change ?
>
> Insta
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 03:36:25PM +0200, Kompar Krisztian wrote:
> I would like to get more information about AMD64 port of debain sarge.
> The stability and reliability is very important for me. For this time
> only official i386 release of sarge are runing on my servers. Now I want
> to use more
Kompar Krisztian wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to get more information about AMD64 port of debain sarge.
> The stability and reliability is very important for me. For this time
> only official i386 release of sarge are runing on my servers. Now I want
> to use more than 4Gb RAM that is why I
* Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:02:14:27:55+0200] scribed:
> Movin to amd64 debian testing, I am trying to runfrom X-system window manager
> a scientific application that requires (on 32 debian) libmotif3. Not present
> on deian 64 repositories. Is any equivalent.
I find this:
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> in earlier days apt-get dist-upgrade did automatically upgrade the kernel,
> too.
>
> This behavior is no more. When did this change ?
Install linux-image-2.6-cputype
It depends on the latest kernel. In the past kernel-image-2.
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:27:55PM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Movin to amd64 debian testing, I am trying to runfrom X-system window manager
> a scientific application that requires (on 32 debian) libmotif3. Not present
> on deian 64 repositories. Is any equivalent.
>
> I am also trying to
Dear All,
I would like to get more information about AMD64 port of debain sarge.
The stability and reliability is very important for me. For this time
only official i386 release of sarge are runing on my servers. Now I want
to use more than 4Gb RAM that is why I am planing to install an AMD64 port
Movin to amd64 debian testing, I am trying to runfrom X-system window manager
a scientific application that requires (on 32 debian) libmotif3. Not present
on deian 64 repositories. Is any equivalent.
I am also trying to install window manager mwm. What about? I do not make use
at 64bit of any d
For some reason I just lost my cdrom / dvd drive (same). I did an
update and upgrade, burned a CD in k3b and all was working well. I
came home to find that the computer had crashed hard - no mouse, no
keyboard, couldn't log in remotely, nothing worked. I restarted and
everything is OK except that
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hello all,
in earlier days apt-get dist-upgrade did automatically upgrade the kernel,
too.
This behavior is no more. When did this change ?
Best regards
Hans
apt-get will only upgrade the kernel if a metapackage depends on the new
kernel - linux-image-amd64-k8 de
Hello all,
in earlier days apt-get dist-upgrade did automatically upgrade the kernel,
too.
This behavior is no more. When did this change ?
Best regards
Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Message transféré de [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date : Wed, 31 May 2006 16:38:45 +0200
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adresse de retour :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sujet : Re: AMD64 debian Arch and NPTL
À : Jo Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Selon Jo Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks Jo.
the c
34 matches
Mail list logo
