Todd,
I have debian-i386 installed in chroot and nspluginwrapper seems to
work without obvious errors. In particular, I see it in Seamonkey's
about:plugins page as
===cut===
Netscape 4 Plugins Wrapper
File name: npwrapper.so
nspluginwrapper 0.9.90.1 adds support for i386 compiled Netscape
Hi list,
I have just upgraded dchroot and schroot to 0.99.2-2 and my dchroot_start
script does not work anymore.
If I start an application with it I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ opera
E: Only one command may be specified
I: Run "dchroot --help" to list usage example and all available options
If I s
Hi
Try to change to schroot. That works for me and I changed when dchroot quit
working.
/Gudjon
Þann Sunnudagur 9. júlí 2006 11:02 skrifaði Jack Malmostoso:
> Hi list,
>
> I have just upgraded dchroot and schroot to 0.99.2-2 and my dchroot_start
> script does not work anymore.
> If I start an
On 7/9/06, Jack Malmostoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
exec dchroot -c ia32 -d -q "`basename $0`" "$ARGS"
Try
exec dchroot -c ia32 -d -q "`basename $0` $ARGS"
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2006 11:02 AM, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ opera
> E: Only one command may be specified
> I: Run "dchroot --help" to list usage example and all available options
>
> If I start opera with the dchroot command, it works:
>
> [E
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:10:08 +0200, Max A. wrote:
> Try
> exec dchroot -c ia32 -d -q "`basename $0` $ARGS"
That worked perfectly.
Thanks!
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:40:07 +0200, Matteo Vescovi wrote:
> But
> few minutes later I left dchroot for schroot, so the problem disappered
> completely ;-)
What are the advantages of schroot over dchroot? I never had problems with
it.
Thanks!
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by D
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 01:33:25PM +0200, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:40:07 +0200, Matteo Vescovi wrote:
>
> > But
> > few minutes later I left dchroot for schroot, so the problem disappered
> > completely ;-)
>
> What are the advantages of schroot over dchroot?
The command
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2006 01:33 PM, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> What are the advantages of schroot over dchroot? I never had problems with
> it.
> Thanks!
Hi,
as you can find in [1], the main advantage is the fact that
"schroot shares most of its options with dchroo
Hi,
Since the dchroot script provided on
http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html
no longer works with the new dchroot, I suggest that the howto to be
updated.
I have migrated to schroot, as shown in the 'Migration' section in the
dchroot manpage.
My do_dchroot
2006/7/8, Craig Hagerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Sorry if this is off topic - I have been searching for an answer
unsuccessfully for a couple days.
I have been trying to get my computer set up to use Japanese. I have
read through several web pages and installed a lot of suggested
software with
Hi
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:10:08 +0200, Max A. wrote:
> Try
> exec dchroot -c ia32 -d -q "`basename $0` $ARGS"
If I use the following commands I still have to wait 5s because
all X applications are trying to find /tmp/.ICE/. Any idea how
to fix that (except bind-mounting /tmp)?
$ echo $DISPLAY
Jack Malmostoso wrote:
Hi list,
I have just upgraded dchroot and schroot to 0.99.2-2 and my dchroot_start
script does not work anymore.
If I start an application with it I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ opera
E: Only one command may be specified
I: Run "dchroot --help" to list usage example and all
On (09/07/06 03:04), Max A. wrote:
> To: Jack Malmostoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-x86-64@lists.debian.org
> From: "Max A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 03:04:31 -0700
> Subject: Re: Problems with dchroot_start
>
> On 7/9/06, Jack Malmostoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >e
Art Edwards wrote:
> This brought up the question, who uses 64 bit Linux anyway?
Well, me, and that's all I really care about.
> It can't be the desktop
> community, seeing that the standard office tool doesn't really
> work for 64-bit.
TeX works perfectly for me. 1/2 :-)
> Besides the instru
How does one go about installing the nvidia drivers on an etch amd64 box? I
have tried before but haven't been able to get it to work. A couple
questions, any advice/ideas welcome.
1. Is there howto or ???
2. Should I install the drivers from the nvidia web site or is there a better
debian way
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:23:54PM +0300, Török Edvin wrote:
> Btw, what is the appropriate severity level for a package that doesn't
> work on a certain architecture at all? Is it release critical?
If the architecture is a release candidate, yes.
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "As
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:00:14 +0200, Alan Ianson wrote:
> 2. Should I install the drivers from the nvidia web site or is there a
> better debian way?
Of course the debian way:
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on
On Sun July 9 2006 16:21, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:00:14 +0200, Alan Ianson wrote:
> > 2. Should I install the drivers from the nvidia web site or is there a
> > better debian way?
>
> Of course the debian way:
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/
Thanks Jack,
Alan Ianson wrote:
On Sun July 9 2006 16:21, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:00:14 +0200, Alan Ianson wrote:
2. Should I install the drivers from the nvidia web site or is there a
better debian way?
Of course the debian way:
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-
On Sun July 9 2006 17:12, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Alan Ianson wrote:
> > On Sun July 9 2006 16:21, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:00:14 +0200, Alan Ianson wrote:
> >>> 2. Should I install the drivers from the nvidia web site or is there a
> >>> better debian way?
> >>
> >> Of
It is very simple and easy to set things up using the latest installer
from the nvidia website. If you choose to go that route then there is
only one thing that you need to know. The installer from the nvidia
website puts your drivers and extensions in the old modules location
which is:
/usr/X1
On Sun July 9 2006 17:23, Michael Langley wrote:
> It is very simple and easy to set things up using the latest installer
> from the nvidia website. If you choose to go that route then there is
> only one thing that you need to know. The installer from the nvidia
> website puts your drivers and e
23 matches
Mail list logo
