On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 06:07:00AM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Although not specific to 64bit, my interest is here:
Please, ask on debian-user when you know it's not an amd64 question.
> Services/applications (such as gnome) stopped by renaming the soft link in
> the
> specific runlel are
Although not specific to 64bit, my interest is here:
Services/applications (such as gnome) stopped by renaming the soft link in the
specific runlel are still updated/upgraded when running aptitude or apt-get?
thanks
francesco pietra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hello All,
I've updated two days ago my unstable version of Debian for AMD64 and it seems that GNOME has some troubles to be executed: the same happens also with gnome-terminal and firefox (it takes the 99% of resources but it's not shown).
X is performing fine, so maybe some library has been c
Hi,
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
>
>Edit openoffice.org-2.0.3/debian/rules and there is some variable
> build_amd64???=n that should be y
> I only started building it seemed to work properly after that change.
This is right. It works... until some error occurs. :-/
So here is the way to mak
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:03:01PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:19:54PM -0400, Ed L. Cashin wrote:
> > Has there been any news about the amd64 BADSIG on the Release file at
> > amd64.debian.net?
>
> If you are running etch, why are you still pointing a deb source at
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:19:54PM -0400, Ed L. Cashin wrote:
> Has there been any news about the amd64 BADSIG on the Release file at
> amd64.debian.net?
If you are running etch, why are you still pointing a deb source at
amd64.debian.net at all?
> I checked the archives but didn't see any furthe
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 03:14:26PM -0400, Robert Isaac wrote:
> The lpi certification covers both .deb and .rpm package managers in
> its 101 test.
When I did the first part of LPI 101 a couple of years ago, the debian
stuff was pretty new I think. A lot of the general quesions were still
very re
On 7/25/06, Gnu-Raiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 08:08, Christian Powers wrote:
> Anyone,
> I am currently a Debian only user at home and at work. Most
> of my computers are running 64bit kernels and of course the
> others are running 32bit systems and an ARM type sys
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jo Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > T?r?k Edvin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Today I got this error while running `aptitude update`:
> >>
> >> W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net stable Release: The following
> >> signatures were invalid:
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 08:08, Christian Powers wrote:
> Anyone,
> I am currently a Debian only user at home and at work. Most
> of my computers are running 64bit kernels and of course the
> others are running 32bit systems and an ARM type system. I am
> currently working on gaining some "off
On 7/25/06, Hemlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:45:16 -0400, Christian Powers wrote
> Anyone,
lpi.org
Yes, there are two 101 exams you can take, one geared towards rpm and the
other is greared towards dpkg. Your choice.
Cheers,
I think that just changed so that both pa
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:45:16 -0400, Christian Powers wrote
> Anyone,
lpi.org
Yes, there are two 101 exams you can take, one geared towards rpm and the
other is greared towards dpkg. Your choice.
Cheers,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Anyone, I am currently a Debian only user at home and at work. Most of my computers are running 64bit kernels and of course the others are running 32bit systems and an ARM type system. I am currently working on gaining some "official" knowledge of Linux and actually having proof of it. I have
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:45:16AM -0400, Christian Powers wrote:
> Anyone,
>
What certifications?
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Anyone,-- Christian
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, sigi wrote:
I'm using this package since it's released, and had only very few
crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
others it has no problem.
Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt nor .doc-files.
Mostly I use OOo-writer - and
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First I checked the HDs, reseeding dimms. OK.
>
> Then, because reiserfs 3.6 of my choice was unanimously considered
> inappropriate for amd64, I reinstalled amd64 Deabian etch with daily-build
> netinstall: primary partitions for boot, root, and s
Hi
Edit openoffice.org-2.0.3/debian/rules and there is some variable
build_amd64???=n that should be y
I only started building it seemed to work properly after that change.
Hope it helps
Gudjon
Þann Mánudagur 24. júlí 2006 23:13 skrifaði Emmanuel Fleury:
> Hi,
>
> A J Stiles wrote:
> > I do n
18 matches
Mail list logo
