On Thu July 12 2007 06:10:42 pm Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Are there other things that you find iceweasel does better than
> konqueror? I don't run KDE, but when I installed Etch in testing, the
> mozilla namechange was happening and it was confusing to follow so I
> switched to Konq.
By & lar
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 05:54:05PM -0700, Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Thu July 12 2007 05:16:07 pm Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> > Note, however, that while I can view thenorthface.com, the adobe test
> > page thats supposed to verify that your flashplayer is working, doesn't
> > work. Oh well.
>
>
On Thu July 12 2007 05:16:07 pm Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Note, however, that while I can view thenorthface.com, the adobe test
> page thats supposed to verify that your flashplayer is working, doesn't
> work. Oh well.
I find http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome doesn't work with konqueror
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:28:18PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> All machines I setup now are done with software raid1, and then LVM on
> top of that. I haven't had much luck with root on LVM yet (seems to
> hard to fix), so I tend to have a 10G partition for a raid1 to use as
> root and then
Hello,
Restarting my own thread.
Since nspluginwrapper can't be backported from Sid/Lenny to Etch, I've
gone ahead and installed an etch-ia32 chroot on my etch-amd64 Athlon
box.
I'm running Konqueror and needing to access some sites that require
flashplayer.
In the chroot, I installed the same
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 01:14:18PM -0500, Seb wrote:
> Thanks so much for this concise and clear summary of partitions! I'll
> make sure the /home is not primary but logical. I'll also check into the
> benefits of the LVM setup you suggested.
LVM lets you turn one or more devices/partitions into
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:27:42 -0400,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
[...]
> The way the partition table works on PCs is that there is room for 4
> entries. Those are your 4 primary partitions. That's it. No more
> bytes left for partition entries. To get around this, logical
> par
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:41:07AM -0500, Sebastian P.Luque wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:25:04 -0400,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > As long as swap is larger than ram, suspend should be OK with it.
>
> > Of course it is imposible to have 4 primary partitions if
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:25:04 -0400,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
[...]
> As long as swap is larger than ram, suspend should be OK with it.
> Of course it is imposible to have 4 primary partitions if you have any
> logical partitions since the logical partitions all share a primary
thanks everybody for the advice. Ill make those changes.
Cavan
On 7/12/07, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:49:57AM -0400, Cavan Mejias wrote:
> my new fstab now looks like this:
>
> # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
> #
>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:49:57AM -0400, Cavan Mejias wrote:
> my new fstab now looks like this:
>
> # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
> #
> #
> proc/proc procdefaults0 0
> /dev/sda6 / ext3defaults,errors=
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 09:16:10AM -0500, Seb wrote:
> Now that I got through wrestling Vista's partition, I stumble upon this
> issue. During installation of Debian testing onto the laptop, right after
> packages chosen for install have been downloaded, I get the following
> message:
>
> ---<---
my new fstab now looks like this:
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
#
proc/proc procdefaults0 0
/dev/sda6 / ext3defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1
/dev/sda5 noneswapsw
On 7/12/07, Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am not really familar with multiprozessors or multicore systems except
installing a smp enabled kernel and see more then one cpu in
/proc/cpuinfo.
On clustersystems are tools for distributing prozesses to free nodes of
the cluster.
Am Donnerstag 12 Juli 2007 schrieb Cavan Mejias:
> Hi everybody,
> Does anyone know what changes i need to make to fstab to have
> my 14 GB fat32 partition and my 40 GB WindowsNTFS partition mount
> automatically at boot? Disks, in administration, lists the 1st as
Hi everybody,
Does anyone know what changes i need to make to fstab to have
my 14 GB fat32 partition and my 40 GB WindowsNTFS partition mount
automatically at boot? Disks, in administration, lists the 1st as /dev/sda7
and the 2nd as /dev/sda2? pmount doesn't give an
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 05:27:20PM -0500, Seb wrote:
> That is the problem, the boot partition is the largest (137 out of the 160
> Gb total), and can only be reduced to about 80 Gb!! The Vista system is
> "optimized" to make efficient use of the hard drive by creating 4
> partitions with several
Hi again,
Now that I got through wrestling Vista's partition, I stumble upon this
issue. During installation of Debian testing onto the laptop, right after
packages chosen for install have been downloaded, I get the following
message:
---<---cut here---start--
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:48:40 -0500,
Seb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I may have found a workaround though. I had created these so-called
> "recovery" DVDs once the laptop went through the whole first-run
> procedure. Booting into the 1st DVD there's an option to install
> out-of-box softw
Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
Hi,
I am not really familar with multiprozessors or multicore systems except
installing a smp enabled kernel and see more then one cpu in
/proc/cpuinfo.
How is it running on single desktopsystems, does the smp enabled kernel
do the work for distributing the prozesses
the kernel will share the threads across the processors / cores.
you can see this in 'top', the processes being shared around
if you want the program you are writing to use more than one cpu you
will need to thread it.
if you are running lots of different programs (as you do on a desktop)
the
Hi,
I am not really familar with multiprozessors or multicore systems except
installing a smp enabled kernel and see more then one cpu in
/proc/cpuinfo.
On clustersystems are tools for distributing prozesses to free nodes of
the cluster.
How is it running on single desktopsystems, does the smp e
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 23:25, Thiago Nolasco wrote:
> Hello everyone ...
> I've got one probleam
> my notebook had a button on front panel witch 1 of these buttons doesn't
> work, the kernel that i compile had a support for acpi(buttons)
> the halt button works, just this one doens't work, i
23 matches
Mail list logo
