MD Database

2008-01-07 Thread Tuttle sundry
Here's what we're offering for this week: Licensed MDs in the United States 788,142 in total * 17,306 emails MD in over 34 specialties Can easily be sorted by 16 different fields Database of US Pharma Companies Personal email addresses (47,000 in total) and names for top level executives

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Alex Samad
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 07:47:13PM -0800, Max Alekseyev wrote: > On Jan 7, 2008 5:33 PM, Alex Malinovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:25:11PM -0800, Max Alekseyev wrote: > > > > > > 32-bit java plugin via nspluginwrapper works fine in 64-bit > > > > > > browsers.

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Alex Samad
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:29:46PM -0800, Alex Malinovich wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 09:50 +1100, Alex Samad wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:25:11PM -0800, Max Alekseyev wrote: > > > On Jan 7, 2008 1:43 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --snip-- > > > You don't need chroot for t

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Max Alekseyev
On Jan 7, 2008 5:33 PM, Alex Malinovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:25:11PM -0800, Max Alekseyev wrote: > > > > > 32-bit java plugin via nspluginwrapper works fine in 64-bit browsers. [...] > Disregard the previous email. Looks like it doesn't work. > nspluginwrappe

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Alex Malinovich
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 09:50 +1100, Alex Samad wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:25:11PM -0800, Max Alekseyev wrote: > > On Jan 7, 2008 1:43 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > 32-bit java plugin via nspluginwrapper works fine in 64-bit browsers. > > > hadn't thought of that, j

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Alex Malinovich
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 09:50 +1100, Alex Samad wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:25:11PM -0800, Max Alekseyev wrote: > > On Jan 7, 2008 1:43 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --snip-- > > You don't need chroot for that. Installing ia32-libs or libc6-i386 > > should be enough for running mo

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Alex Samad
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:25:11PM -0800, Max Alekseyev wrote: > On Jan 7, 2008 1:43 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 32-bit java plugin via nspluginwrapper works fine in 64-bit browsers. > > hadn't thought of that, just tried to install the plugin in my chroot and it > > wants to

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Max Alekseyev
On Jan 7, 2008 1:43 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 32-bit java plugin via nspluginwrapper works fine in 64-bit browsers. > hadn't thought of that, just tried to install the plugin in my chroot and it > wants to install a whole bundle of other stuff, including a browser. Did you > i

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Heikki Levanto
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:57:49AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: > You can use konqueror, a 64-bit web browser that is able to use > Sun java without a mozilla-style plugin. Many sites, especially > java compliance test sites, works fine with this. As well as > many java games. > > Some sites do not

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Alex Samad
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:35:39AM -0800, Max Alekseyev wrote: > On Oct 27, 2007 4:10 PM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The sun desktop demo works fine so far - is there really no way to get sun > > java6 into iceweasel ? > > > > What is the recommendet approach ? > > 32-bit java plug

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Max Alekseyev
On Oct 27, 2007 4:10 PM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The sun desktop demo works fine so far - is there really no way to get sun > java6 into iceweasel ? > > What is the recommendet approach ? 32-bit java plugin via nspluginwrapper works fine in 64-bit browsers. Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Another flood of spam

2008-01-07 Thread Nuno Magalhães
-- Forwarded message -- From: Chris Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jan 7, 2008 3:16 PM Subject: Re: Another flood of spam To: Debian users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Jan 7, 2008 8:14 AM, Qubby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't seen anything in my Gmail inbox. Maybe Google zappe

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Alex Malinovich
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 10:57 +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: > Michael wrote: > > Hey, > > > > What's the status for native-amd64 java support for mozilla browsers in > > debian unstable today ? > > > > AFAIKS there's sun java5/6 jre and gij 4.2 but they have no browser plugin. > > > You can use ko

Re: status of native java JRE ?

2008-01-07 Thread Helge Hafting
Michael wrote: Hey, What's the status for native-amd64 java support for mozilla browsers in debian unstable today ? AFAIKS there's sun java5/6 jre and gij 4.2 but they have no browser plugin. You can use konqueror, a 64-bit web browser that is able to use Sun java without a mozilla-style