Francesco Pietra wrote:
I have resumed a dismissed (removed mem slots, HDD WD Raptor, floppy,
CD-ROM) computer that was running fine with amd64 etch raid1.
Mainboard Tyan S2895, two dual-opteron 265, graphic card Pixelview
6600256M DDR DVI PCI-Express. New two sata Maxtor HDD 250GB, 4 slots
King
u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
> Mainly if you do so globally. My suggestion would be to run builds
> that insist on second-guessing the compiler under "setarch i386" (aka
> "linux32") to limit the scope of the altered uname information:
>
> $ uname -m
> x86_64
> $ linux32 uname -m
> i68
Brett Viren writes:
> I could override /bin/uname, but I worry that would lead to other
> problems.
Mainly if you do so globally. My suggestion would be to run builds
that insist on second-guessing the compiler under "setarch i386" (aka
"linux32") to limit the scope of the altered uname informa
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:55:29PM -0400, Brett Viren wrote:
[snip]
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions to solve this problem?
would a 32b chroot do, I believe that is how I used to run 32 browser
for 32bit plugins
>
> Thanks,
> -Brett.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-
On Tuesday 24 Mar 2009, Brett Viren wrote:
> I have several Opteron systems running 32 bit Debian and a very large
> C++ based software stack for doing Physics simulations and analysis
> (ROOT, Geant4, Gaudi). Somewhat recently the kernels for these CPUs
> switched to a 32/64 bit biarch kernel wit
I have several Opteron systems running 32 bit Debian and a very large
C++ based software stack for doing Physics simulations and analysis
(ROOT, Geant4, Gaudi). Somewhat recently the kernels for these CPUs
switched to a 32/64 bit biarch kernel with the linux-image-amd64
series.
My problem is that
Hi,
Maybe I should be posting this elsewhere because the problem occurs in a
32-bit chroot (sid), but I'm not sure what the best forum would be. I
certainly don't see the problem in my main AMD64 system.
After an 'apt-get update; apt-get upgrade', the following error occurs:
---<---
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:03:43AM +, A J Stiles wrote:
>
> Besides which, there is no such thing as a "WYSIWYG" HTML editor, because the
> same HTML Source Code will display differently in different client
> environments. The harsh fact is that What You See Is Not Necessarily What
> Every
On Sunday 22 Mar 2009, macdowell@dpf.gov.br wrote:
> hello,
>
> why we can't find iceape-browser in lenny, there is only for etch ?
>
> is there any conflict to download etch version with lenny ?
>
> if so there others wysiwyg html editors for lenny?
>
> thanks
Just download the Source Code fr
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>
>> Which is a polite way of rephrasing what I said earlier :)
>
> No, you pointed against an O: bug. The above ia a perfectly valid reason
> because when the security team (volunteers, you know, and we all know
> how crappy Mozilla with the
10 matches
Mail list logo
