Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal

2019-05-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Could you PLEASE stop posting to debian-ports@? You are sending these mails to every Debian Ports architecture mailing list. I already asked for the third time now. Thank You, Adrian > On May 26, 2019, at 5:34 AM, wrote: > > Sorry if this is off-topic, but I can't help asking if that "15381

RE: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal

2019-05-25 Thread i
Sorry if this is off-topic, but I can't help asking if that "15381 March 1977" was on purpose or just from some wonky email client: 15380 days after March 1st 1977 happens to be April 10th 2019, so... -- Pengcheng Xu https://jsteward.moe/ > -Original Message- > From: Aurelien Jarno

Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal

2019-05-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 15413 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Thats ok, end of May is a nice point to take. Thanks for the work and the timeframe for the rest! kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 have now been moved to debian-ports. As hurd-i386 has been moved earlier, it means that all the 3 architectures have now

Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal

2019-05-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2019-05-25 13:00, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > Hi, > > Em sáb, 25 de mai de 2019 às 10:57, Aurelien Jarno > escreveu: > > > > kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 have now been moved to debian-ports. As > > hurd-i386 has been moved earlier, it means that all the 3 architectures > > have

Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal

2019-05-25 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi, Em sáb, 25 de mai de 2019 às 10:57, Aurelien Jarno escreveu: > > kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 have now been moved to debian-ports. As > hurd-i386 has been moved earlier, it means that all the 3 architectures > have now been moved. Nice :-) Not sure who's the admin (I couldn't find the

Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal

2019-05-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, On 2019-04-24 12:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 15381 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > > It would be nice to have a bit more than 2 weeks to do all of that. > > > Ok. How much? Is 6 or 8 weeks better? I don't think, given how long this > > > is on the table already, it doesn't make