Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 11:44 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: [...] > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Adam D. Barratt > wrote: > > > >  what is the reason why that package is not moving forward? > > > > I assume you're referring to the dpkg upload t

Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 10:20 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: [...] >  debian-riscv has been repeatedly asking for a single zero-impact > line > to be included in *one* file in *one* dpkg-related package which > would > allow riscv to stop being a NMU architecture and become part of >

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 19:04 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > As for "porter qualification" > = > > We got burned during the Jessie release, where a person answered the > roll call for sparc and we kept sparc as a release architecture for > Jessie. However, we ended up

Re: binNMUs: please exercise some care

On 2015-10-23 13:28, Thorsten Glaser wrote: [...] On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] It's also not quite that simple, even working things out by hand - see #599128 for example. Hm, I’m still under the impression that the +bN suffix to the Debian version of the package

Re: binNMUs: please exercise some care

On 2015-10-23 12:02, Thorsten Glaser wrote: On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Adam D. Barratt wrote: wanna-build does, yes, but at least the Release Team tend to use the "wb" wrapper tool which automatically works out the next free number on each architecture. Ah, cool – so we have onl

amd64 qualification for Wheezy

Hi, With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears, we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release architectures for the Wheezy release. Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 02:34 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the next two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the default compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be many

Bug #248043: ftp.debian.org: Request for new architecture: amd64

Hi, amd64 has been in sid for quite a while now, so I think we can close this now. :-) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]