Re: Flash (Re: OpenOffice-2.0.)

2005-12-19 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
v0n0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I fixed preinst script, could you try it now and then write me? ;) Thanks! Still fails: Setting up mozilla-firefox-32 (1.0.7-1.32b3) ... Updating mozilla-firefox chrome registry...E: Registration process existed with status: 127 E:

Re: Flash (Re: OpenOffice-2.0.)

2005-12-17 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
v0n0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've corrected these problems. I'm looking forward for your report. OK, first, it seems that the required dependency ia32-libs = 1.5-20051126 fails as only 1.5 is available. If I take the current 1.5 source and bump the version number up, I still get this:

Re: Flash (Re: OpenOffice-2.0.)

2005-12-17 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, first, it seems that the required dependency ia32-libs = 1.5-20051126 fails as only 1.5 is available. If I take the current 1.5 That problem was solved by temporarily removing the unofficial Debian repository from sources.list, so it could get v0v0

Re: Flash (Re: OpenOffice-2.0.)

2005-12-15 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
v0n0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have repacked some 32bit debs. You can now try it from my repository, but please read notes on my website first! Nice, thanks. Here are two bugs I found: Setting up mozilla-firefox-32 (1.0.7-1.32b1) ... Updating mozilla-firefox chrome registry...E: Registration

Flash (Re: OpenOffice-2.0.)

2005-12-13 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
v0n0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This fd openoffice...I'm running even Firefox with Flash without chroot!!! How have you managed that? All my attempts to install Flash on my amd64 laptop have failed miserably... -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *

Re: why is amd64 still separate?

2005-12-07 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Adam Stiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Except that the first I described sounds an awful lot like Ubuntu . Except that Ubuntu also only supports a subset (ie. the packages in Ubuntu main) of the packages Debian currently has. This is not a snide at Ubuntu, I think that is a good choice for

Re: mplayer

2005-10-04 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
hjalmar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No I am not running X as root. I can not get mplayer to work as a normal user but I have no problems with it when run as root. You do have a file permission problem. Unfortunately I don't remember which file in /dev or /proc you need to chmod, even though I ran

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-08-29 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Ernest jw ter Kuile [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anyway, It never crashed on me, (that I know of). I and my pc is switched on nearly permanently. I enabled the forcible preempt option and it seems to work fine on my Ferrari. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology

Re: X.org enters in Sid

2005-07-15 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Modestas Vainius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unstable is seriuosly broken because of a series of transitions happening. That's what unstable is for. Xorg is still at -2, which fails to build on some achitectures (as expected). After -3 gets uploaded and built on all architectures, QT 3.3.4

Re: notebook choice advice...

2005-06-20 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Tobias Krais [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Acer Notebook has - as far as I know a broadcom wireless chip. I don't know whether it works. I have both BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller and NetXtreme BCM5788 Gigabit Ethernet working fine on my Acer Ferrari. Gigabit works with the stock tg3

Re: notebook choice advice...

2005-06-20 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have an acer wlmi 5024. For what it is worth, here are my experiences with Acer Ferrari 3200. - Display works fine (don't remember if I have proprietary ATI drivers or stock 4.x). Xinerama works well. - All applications work fine (OO.org from

Re: KDE from experimental

2005-04-14 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I didn't find those in experimental, however in pkg-kde on alioth there seem to be pre3 versions. Downloading and compiling now. libs, base and admin upgraded, the rest were pre1. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology

Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?

2005-04-07 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Javier Aguilar Saavedra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: seems to be down since yesterday. Does anyone know another location for the kde 3.4 amd64 debs? This is a temporary location until people.debian.org comes back. It might go down at any time so do not complain. deb

Re: Question for KDE 3.4 debs users (dbus-1)

2005-04-03 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: packages at http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64 ? Updated with the latest dbus-1. apt-get upgrade seems to work nicely. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http

Re: Question for KDE 3.4 debs users (dbus-1)

2005-04-02 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Any hints? The only (recent) difference between the two packages is this changelog entry: dbus (0.23.2-3qt1) unstable; urgency=low * Rebuild to enable the Qt bindings. -- Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:19:45 +0100 And the

Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?

2005-04-01 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Modestas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: They are available here: deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64/ ./ I guess they are for pure64. I guess so, the compiler which I used is gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-12) I'm not familiar with the difference of pure64 and gcc 3.4, just happily use the

Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?

2005-04-01 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do u already have any feedback on those debs? At least one person in addition to me has installed the debs and has been happy. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @

Re: [AGAIN] kde 3.4 packages anybody?

2005-03-28 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Chris Wakefield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am wondering why you are emphatic about the kde-3.4 sources on alioth to build with? That way you get _Debian_ binary packages with a minimum of hassle. Basically all I did was this: 1. Add pkg-kde.alioth deb-src repository to sources.list 2.

Re: [AGAIN] kde 3.4 packages anybody?

2005-03-28 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm currently compiling the stuff from source and will probably set up a binary repository (probably unsigned packages, so use at your own discretion). I'll let you know later where. OK, the packages are being uploaded to the following apt repository

Re: [AGAIN] kde 3.4 packages anybody?

2005-03-27 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Zaq Rizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Have you tried installing from source? I'm currently compiling the stuff from source and will probably set up a binary repository (probably unsigned packages, so use at your own discretion). I'll let you know later where. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is

Re: [AGAIN] kde 3.4 packages anybody?

2005-03-27 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Chris Wakefield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I did manage to compile _most_ of kde3.4, however kdemultimedia would'nt compile _no how_ for me. Yeah, there's a bug for the 64-bit machines in the source. I made a trivial fix for it and I hope that it works (at least it compiles). Comment out the