amd64 security - was Re: X.org and NVidia

On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 09:51 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: GOMBAS Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:24:42AM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote: I think staying with testing is the best thing to do for non-developers anyways. Has the problem of security updates

Re: nv_sata

If I remember well the easiest way to solve thist problem was to disable in BIOS the second SATA channel (don't remember if this is the correct name, but I had two SATA disks and I could use both of them even after disabling the second unused interface). Pavel On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 12:59 +0200,

Re: security support

will carry amd64 pacakges, too. Best regards Frederik Schueler On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:20:18PM +0200, Pavel Jurus wrote: Ahh thanks for clarifying of this issue. In this case I would however consider to be fair to mention that amd64 sarge doesn't have any security support

security support

In many places is written that although AMD64 port of sarge is unofficial it has full security support of debian-security team. I cannot find any amd64 packages on security.debian.org though. Where can I find security updates for the AMD64 sarge? Pavel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: security support

at 18:24 +0200, Sythos wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 06:10:56PM +0200, Pavel Jurus wrote: In many places is written that although AMD64 port of sarge is unofficial it has full security support of debian-security team. I cannot find any amd64 packages on security.debian.org though. Where can

Re: security support

, Sythos wrote: Il Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:06:46 +0200 Pavel Jurus [EMAIL PROTECTED] scrisse: That means that AMD64 sarge will not get security updates? From what I understand AMD64 should become official port (hopefully) soon - but that would mean that only AMD64 unstable and testing

Re: libc6 packages not in gcc4 Packages list

, 2005-06-14 at 11:15 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Pavel Jurus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I wanted to upgrade one of my computers using this /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/gcc4 unstable main contrib non-free Problem is that libc6 is non-upgradable

solved - Re: libc6 packages not in gcc4 Packages list

I hate to reply to my own mails but Packages file seems to be corrected now:) Thanks Pavel On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 11:52 +0200, Pavel Jurus wrote: To clarify my question - I'm talking about AMD64 debian port that is compiled by the gcc4 branch. But since this port is even more unofficial I'm

libc6 packages not in gcc4 Packages list

. Looking at http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/gcc4/pool/main/g/glibc/ however shows libc6_2.3.5-1_amd64.deb which is probably the needed package. What's the problem with Packages file and how can I solve/work around it? Pavel Jurus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

where can I find gcc-4.0?

Please could someone tell me where can I find distribution compiled by gcc-4.0 (former amd64-gcc-3.4 branch)? Pavel Jurus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcc-3.4 branch gone?

and fortran95 on pure AMD64 Debian? Pavel Jurus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]