Re: Problem with packages

Read the logs, the archive has moved: http://amd64.debian.net/README.mirrors.html deb http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contrib -Peter Ronny Wikh wrote: Hi! After a period of inactivity I needed to update my pure64 installation. Looking through the (massive) backlog of messages

Re: Any idea what's wrong?

Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Vernon Dozier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: --- Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Vernon Dozier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I just did a apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade... this is the first time I'd done this since the a

Re: fglrx64 for ati 9700 pro

Use my debs instead of trying to alien them: http://rufus.hackish.org/~rufus/files/fglrx/ -Peter Christophe Dupré wrote: Hi guys, I've been trying to install fglrx64 in order to make use of the 3D acceleration of my ATI 9700 pro. I downloaded fglrx64_4_3_0-8.10.19-1.x86_64.rpm, aliened it, and then

Re: Time drift in amd64

Bharath Ramesh wrote: I just installed a fresh installation of amd64 on another athlon box. I find that the clock seems to be drifting by 8-10 seconds every day. Any idea how I can fix this drift. This drift seems to be large. Just install ntp-simple and it'll keep you within a few milliseconds off

Re: flash player for firefox

64, not the crap Intel stuff) to make the platform truly lucrative for software makers in a business sense. There is libflash-swfplayer, an open-source one, but it's very, very buggy. -Peter Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: afs client

Charles Leggett wrote: Has anyone managed to get the AFS client working with a 2.6 kernel on an opteron? I'm running a 2.6.10 kernel, and have tried recent CVS snapshots, and while I'm no longer getting kernel oopses, when trying to start the openafs client I get messages like: Starting AFS service

Re: dchroot script (was Re: running openoffice from chroot)

Alexandru Cabuz wrote: The suggestion with the openoffice \"%u\" worked. But if you say there is a cleaner solution... Yes, but a better thing is to fix dchroot's / su's stupidity with a script (make this do_chroot): I don't understand. What should I do with this script? From the FAQ

dchroot script (was Re: running openoffice from chroot)

Adam Skutt wrote: Yes, but a better thing is to fix dchroot's / su's stupidity with a script (make this do_chroot): #!/bin/bash # Work around dchroot brain-deadness ARGS="" for i in "$@" ; do ARGS="$ARGS '$i'" done exec dchroot -c ia32 -d -q "`basename $0`" "$ARGS" Thank you for the corr

Re: unstable fglrx 8.10.19?

Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: Hello everyone! After upgrading the fglrx drivers from 8.8.25 to the latest 8.10.19, i've noticed that my system became very very unstable. I am experiencing crashes about twice a day, sometime system frizzes without being able to reboot using Alt-SysRr. Try using the d

Re: ldd failing on fglrx-installer

Mark Kennedy wrote: Hi there, I just started installing the debian-pure64-3.4 port on my machine, and ran into a couple of problems building & installing an ATI driver according to . Make sure you're using the amd64 version from

Re: Shared library error compiling ATI drivers

Pedro I. Sanchez wrote: I'm following the steps in http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html Those are the 32-bit drivers. He just posted today about the 64-bit drivers at: http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian-experimental/fglrx-experimental.html You can

gcc-3.4 creates a bad libgcc_s_32.so link.

I was having trouble compiling with -m32 because of errors with libgcc_s_32.so. The link setup was this: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux/3.4.4/libgcc_s_32.so -> ../../../../lib32/libgcc_s.so.1 However the package lib32gcc1installes into: /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 Fixing the link to this

GPG error mirroring the archive

Hi, my mirror of the amd64 archive recently broke becaues of the following errors: gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 20 17:40:22 2005 EST using DSA key ID 2FE487B0 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 20 17:40:22 2005 EST using DSA key ID 2FE487B0 gpg: Can't chec

Re: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs

Peter Nelson wrote: Cyril Chaboisseau wrote: BTW, I have kernel-patch-debian-2.6.10 but that shouldn't make any difference for the compilation of the module There are known problems compiling against 2.6.10. Look at this thread on rage3d for some patches: http://rage3d.net/board/showthread.

Re: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs

Cyril Chaboisseau wrote: Le 19 janvier vers 22:33, Peter Nelson écrivait: Here's a patch I've made against flavio's latest fglrx packages to generate amd64 debs. I *think* it does the right thing placing the 32bit drivers in /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib/ and the 64bit ones

Re: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs

Quoting Johannes Pleikies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thank you very much, this worked well for me. You're welcome. > I used Peter's patch and > http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html . yeah, I forgot to link to (and thank!) Flavio's page. > I used the kernel-agpgart.

AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs

Here's a patch I've made against flavio's latest fglrx packages to generate amd64 debs. I *think* it does the right thing placing the 32bit drivers in /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib/ and the 64bit ones in /usr/X11R6/lib/, with the correct diversions. It works for me, but I don't have any real

Re: New ATI fglrx drivers work with AMD64

Nick Hemsley wrote: OK scrap that, I was using gcc3.3 instead of 3.4. changing the symlink worked for me, although I think you can do it in the make.sh. The module now starts, starting XFree86 however freezes the system (not sure if I can ssh), and /var/log/mesages shows: Jan 19 14:00:02 localho

Re: New ATI fglrx drivers work with AMD64

at 23:08 -0500, Peter Nelson wrote: Hi, I'd just like to give the list a heads up that the new ATI fglrx drivers actually work with amd64. They're only available (as usual) in rpm's but I hacked together Flavio's debian packages and with a bit of manual copying around it

Re: apt wants to remove 526 packages!!?

Alexandru Cabuz wrote: Hello, I usually do a apt-get update apt-get upgrade every couple of days. When there are bugs I just put packages on hold and wait it out, and after a month I try them individually, and if they are still buggy, then I leave them on hold. I decided tonight I was sick of thi

New ATI fglrx drivers work with AMD64

Hi, I'd just like to give the list a heads up that the new ATI fglrx drivers actually work with amd64. They're only available (as usual) in rpm's but I hacked together Flavio's debian packages and with a bit of manual copying around it works. Hopefully someone with a bit more knowledge of how

Re: amd64(gcc4): aptitude dumps core

Harald Dunkel wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Harald Dunkel wrote: | Hi folks, | | Since the most recent upgrade of apt (0.5.27.2.0.0.1.gcc4) | aptitude dies with a core dump immediately. | PS: Going back to the old version built with gcc 3.4 (AFAIK) fixes the problem. Folks, I

Re: Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] wrote: If you google a bit, you'll be able to find some amd64 packages for mplayer, also from marillat. Unfortunately last time i checked, there was no debian repository, so you can't install them by adding a few lines to your sources.list and using apt. You'll have to

Re: upgrading base-files problem

Not sure if this is directly related to the other errors but libc6 and base-files are unhappy with each other. Here's the error: Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-19 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-19.0.0.1.pure64_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /afs/hackish

Re: AMD64 VS EM64T

Jin Zhao wrote: I am currently faced with choosing one of them as our forthcoming 64 bit platform. So far I read a couple of reviews, most of which seems favor AMD64 a little bit. I also did some initial testings on an opteron box with Debian pure64 unstale. So far it looks good. Here's a review

Kernel 2.6.9?

I'm just wondering where kernel-image-2.6.9 is. It's been in i386 unstable for almost a month now, and fixes quite a few issues I have. Thanks, -Peter

Re: Kernel 2.6.9?

Peter Nelson wrote: I'm just wondering where kernel-image-2.6.9 is. It's been in i386 unstable for almost a month now, and fixes quite a few issues I have. I guess I should have been more specific. kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64 exists in /pure64, but not in /gcc-3.4 which is what I'

Bug in libc6?

I have come across the strangest problem. About a week or two ago heimdal kerberos simply stopped working. I don't think it's a heimdal problem because I tried multiple versions and none of them worked, but it did use to work. Here's a stack trace from it crashing: Program received signal SI

Re: blackdown Java, amd64 and java-package

Robert King wrote: What am I doing wrong here? solzhenitsyn:/usr/local/package# make-jpkg j2re-1.4.2-rc1-linux-amd64.bin Creating temporary directory: /tmp/make-jpkg.mFAQu4 Loading plugins: blackdown-j2re.sh blackdown-j2sdk.sh common.sh j2re.sh j2sdk.sh j2se.sh sun-j2re.sh sun-j2sdk.sh No mat

Re: some processes having large memory footprints

Richard Wohlstadter wrote: I'm new with the AMD64 debian port and had some questions I'm hoping someone out there can answer for me. One thing I noticed after installing the AMD64 port on our opterons is that some processes seem to have very large memory footprints on the system. For example,

Re: Working ia32-linux chroot image

Bob Proulx wrote: Peter Nelson wrote: After a bit of tweaking I've gotten what I think is the smallest chroot that will still allow you to use apt-get and dpkg. You did not say but what was the final amount of disk space that you were able to reduce your minimum system down to

Working ia32-linux chroot image

decided to share it. You can download a tar.bz with instructions on how to use it from my site here: <http://rufus.hackish.org/wiki/I386Chroot> Any feedback is welcome, -Peter Nelson

Re: firefox crash

was was wrote: Hi, I have a problem with a mozilla-firefox. When I write in search engines like google, altavista or alltheweb the mozilla crash. Is the package of firefox wrong? Is it a problem of my computer? It's a problem with form autocomplete. Turn off Privacy > Saved Form Information an

Re: Java and others on amd64

Tobias Krais wrote: as for I am new in this list I wanna ask some more questions. Up to now I found not very much information how you solve problems with missing packages on debian amd64. I search for following packages (or an other way how you got it to work): - Java Use the backdown version

Re: Do you know this mirror?

Bob Proulx wrote: Brett Viren wrote: 2) Preservation of hard links and the resulting preservation of disk space. I can't think of any files in a depot that would be hard linked. All of the files look to be unique files to me. What am I missing? I know for a fact that Debian has used ha

Re: modules

was was wrote: Hi, I have a problem with the modutils, when I use modconf or update-modules the shell show: Architecture-specific modutils configuration not found, using defaults. What´s wrong? It's because /etc/modutils/arch only has i386, no x86_64 in it. As far as I can tell the error is ha

Re: Java working

David Liontooth wrote: Sun distributes a version of java for amd64 at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/download.jsp and it works great. Cheers, David cd /usr/local //jre-1_5_0-rc-linux-amd64.bin vi /etc/profile add /usr/local/jre1.5.0/bin Only problem is it doesn't include a java plugin for mozilla

Re: Do you know this mirror?

Brett Viren wrote: Kim Dong-ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: is it http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/ ? but this doesn't support rsync. Yes, it does. Maybe it does, but I couldn't get it to work. It always asked (and I just checked, still does) for a login name / password and a few

Mirroring Problems

Hello, I'm creating a mirror of pure64/gcc-3.4 and every time I run to update I get the following errors: Download of pool/unstable/main/amd64/a/aspell-ukr/aspell-ukr_0.51-0-1_amd64.deb failed: 404 Not Found Download of pool/unstable/main/amd64/d/diasce2/diasce2_1.3.1-2_amd64.deb failed: 404

Re: Is AMD64 Debian port suitable for production servers

Pavol Luptak wrote: Hello, I need to choose a stable software/hardware server solution based on Debian distribution. I'm planning to buy a 64-bit system (MB GigaByte K8VT800, AMD Athlon 64, socket 754, chipset VIA K8T800+8237 with SATA disks). According to the compatibility list http://alioth.deb

Re: /etc/apt/apt.conf APT::Get::Compile flags

Jean-Michel POURE wrote: Dear all, I would like to try compiling ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat packages to AMD-64. Are there special flags needed in /etc/apt/apt.conf to compile using: apt-get source package_name --build? You shouldn't need any flags anywhere as long as you have a deb-src l