On Mar 30, 2005 10:07 AM, Remi Butaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks very much for the information, I suspected something along
these lines. The reason I didn't install it with the same boot order
was to have a free check to do anything with the linux install and the
boot loaders, and I
with the installer, it doesn't matter that much at this
point (as I'm like erasing and reinstalling debian every other day),
but I'll now do it properly :)
Thank you again, I am grateful that there are people willing to spend
the time to educate me.
Best regards,
Remi Butaud
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:23
Debian-installer-version:
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-installer/2005-03-24/monolithic/mini.iso
uname -a: Linux owl 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 #1 Tue Mar 15 17:25:19 CET 2005
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Date: March - 27, 2005
Method: netinstall from
ftp://mirror.switch.ch/mirror/debian-amd64/pure64
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:19:02 +0200, Remi Butaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian-installer-version:
# This entry automatically added by the Debian installer for a non-linux OS
# on /dev/sda1
title Microsoft Windows XP Professional
root(hd1,0)
savedefault
makeactive
4 matches
Mail list logo