Re: I just got what may be another prank email.....

-- Stefano Simonucci GNU/Linux User: #81790 http://counter.li.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ndiswrapper and 32 bit windows drivers

-Link web site, but when I try to load the driver by means of ndisgtk I get an error message. The reason is that the driver is 32-bit while the kernel is 64-bit. But 64-bit Windows drivers are not present in the D-Link web site. What can I do? Thank you Stefano -- Stefano Simonucci GNU/Linux User

Re: gfortran and a compilation

On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 07:16 +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote: Stefano, accepting your experience I started preparing Makefile.config indicaring g77 for Fortran and gcc for C (I am at amd64 debian etch, parallel machine dual opteron) yesterday I went on obtaining successfully makefile.config

Re: gfortran

On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 16:14 +0100, Jo Shields wrote: We make extensive use of Portland, Intel and GNU compilers (both C and Fortran) at work - all of them work fine, and there are certainly no issues with G77 on AMD64. That said, our GAMESS installation was compiled with Intel 9.0 (as GNU

Re: howto says up to 2.6.11 -- is this outdated?

On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 20:34 +0200, Jack Malmostoso wrote: On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:30:21 +0200, hendrik wrote: Is the restriction on kernels up to 2.6.11 serious? At the time of the writing 2.6.11 was the newest kernel. I am running the nvidia drivers with a 2.6.16 kernel. -- I am not

Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64

On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 16:37 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: A Dimecres 31 Agost 2005 23:56, Stefano Simonucci va escriure: On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 18:09 +0200, Frank wrote: They will both allow setting up a 32bit chroot, which is the recomended way to run openoffice since it isn't

Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64

On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:26 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: Thank's Stefano, I will try to reproduce it soon. It's surprise me if it's really so easy and no package for amd64. Leo The openoffice 1.9 is unstable (beta). Effectively openoffice crashes sometimes. I don't know if

Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64

On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 18:09 +0200, Frank wrote: They will both allow setting up a 32bit chroot, which is the recomended way to run openoffice since it isn't 64bit compatible yet. Using a chroot is not the only way of running OpenOffice on the Pure64/AMD64 port of Debian. Look on this list

apt-get problems

A few days ago I have try to upgrade the distribution from the source deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64 unstable main contrib non-free but I obtain this error message WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are

Re: apt-get problems

On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 12:26 +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: Hello, apt-get install base-files=3.1.2 Kind regards Frederik Schueler OK. I have resolved! Thank you Best regards Stefano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Failed to create initrd image [gcc4]

I have tried to use the gcc4 repository: http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/gcc4 unstable Nevertheless I have obtained this error by trying to install kernel-image-2.6.11: /usr/sbin/mkinitrd: line 848: ldd: command not found Failed to create initrd image. The same error is found in the