ved in getting the porters access to
porter boxes? Porter boxes exist so that DDs *not* involved in a port have
access to a machine of the architecture and can keep their packages working.
I've never heard of a porter who didn't have access to their own box
oving libglitz is more painful than it would be otherwise,
because instead of just rebuilding cairo itself without glitz, you must
rebuild everything above cairo in the stack that used pkg-config for
linking.
I don't argue that this makes --as-needed *correct* as a default
e suggested way for the later is upgrading your libtool
> version. It seems this was done _partialy_. Lots of the aclocal.m4
> files still contain old copies of it.
Hrm, oh. Sorry, cancelling the binNMU then.
BTW, couldn't this also be addressed just by adding a
-l/usr/lib/courie
e only available explanations I see are either a buildd error, or a
dpkg bug. Either way, a binNMU should be sufficient to address the problem,
so I've scheduled one.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
i-alpha-2.6
> - linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6
> - linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6
> - linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6
> - linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6
> - linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6
> - linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6
> - linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
--
Steve Langasek Give me a le
ave:
> (add kernel packages here)
Since in 2.6 the kernels are all built from the linux-2.6 package, might it
not be a good idea to tag these as well? (Not offering to do it myself at
the moment, sorry :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Fre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:33:40AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:58 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 a
it's installed without nvidia-glx-dev as well.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
zeof(long) == 8
on 64-bit archs...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ternally defined, or is there some other reason that you
can't typedef it to a long instead of to an int?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:06:52AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> thank you for your detailed answer.
> On 05-May-06 00:24, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:58:27AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > > sarge/main/amd64 BTS Bug
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:58:27AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-May-05 13:35, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:05:49PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > > However, even with the patch from #305122, 'ia32-libs' cannot be built
> > >
cannot be built
> and installed in sarge. This is the case because the patch does not
> remove the 'Depends' and 'Build-Depends' on 'lsb-release' which FTBFS
> in sarge for amd64. The working ia32-libs version 0.7 did not
> (Build-)Depend on 'lsb-r
13 matches
Mail list logo
