Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

Friendly, Sven Luther On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:45:35AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > The final results are in: > > Summary table: > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > ---++-++-++---++-- > armel || 3 |

Re: [D-I] mass kernel udeb update and preparations for RC1

week to confirm this. I don't particularly feel like backporting those fixes to 2.6.17, especially as the etch kernel target is 2.6.18, but others may volunteer to do it, or i may do it if i find some time. Friendlly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: sarge3 kernel build & r3

ily built images). > > > > Cheers, > > FJP > > I ment that when you select sarge in choose-mirror in expert mode you > get the inofficial list and if you choose etch/etch+1/sid you get the > official one. > > Might be too much work for a transient problem tho

Re: Bug#367634: Fwd: support for Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X

ive. d-i is built out of unstable, not testing, though. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: D-I Etch Beta2 - Status update (4)

produce the compressed vmlinuz-* kernel, and dding it to a prep partition). Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: beta status

is here now. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: beta status

On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:04:22AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:00:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:53:53AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: >

Re: beta status

On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:53:53AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On F

Re: beta status

On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:27:52PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:

Re: beta status

On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > Actually, we could simply make a

Re: beta status

On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > Actually, we could simply make an exception for miboot and get it into the > > archive, i think it is no worse than other cases (like amiboot, which is > > linke

Re: beta status

ctually, we could simply make an exception for miboot and get it into the archive, i think it is no worse than other cases (like amiboot, which is linked to parts of amigaos, and thus non-free), and we do distribute those (or at least used to distribute those in the woody times). Friendly, Sve

Re: Security Support AMD64 Sarge

mailing list for that ? Mmm, maybe you are not the best person to ask about this or something, but i guess the people in charge or knowledgeable will jump in and reply or something :) Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]