On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 13:49 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:25:38PM +0100, T.J. Zeeman wrote:
> >
> > I've tried to do this a few times over the past hour or so and every
> > time it came up the same. Is the disk full again perhaps?
>
> The
Hi,
This morning I tried to do an apt-get update and got several errors on
package files from Alioth:
carrington:~# apt-get update
Hit ftp://ftp.gwdg.de sid/non-free Packages
Hit ftp://ftp.gwdg.de sid/non-free Release
Get:1 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/main Packages [3138kB]
Hit h
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 11:06 -0800, Zachary Rizer wrote:
> Please disregard previous email -- I just realized
> powernowd is only on XP-M processors, and that what
> I'm looking for is "Cool 'n Quiet".
>
> My mistake!
Actually, no mistake at all. I have an AMD64 and run powernowd to have
cpu
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 18:52 +0100, Alexander Jede wrote:
> I think the application need the gl-libs in 32bit.
> or what can I do?
If you are using a 32-bit chroot you can just install the 32-bit
nvidia-glx package. Due to dependencies it also pulls in a kernel-module
package, but that won't
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 21:47 +, Erik Norman wrote:
> well, what to do to get javaplugin for mozilla(-firefox) running?
I got it working with a deb from the following mirror:
deb ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/languages/java/linux/debian/ sid non-free
Do note that not all blackdown mirrors carry these
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 15:28 +0100, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
> I use ACPI, but I don't remember if I set APM on or off, will look at that
> tomorrownight when I can get behind my home pc again. It all works AFAICT
> though.
APM is on in the BIOS, but the kernel does not use it as it is not
compiled
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 18:06 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
> point apt to:
>
> deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib
> non-free
I've been running this since shortly after the an
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 19:21 +0100, Marco Amadori wrote:
> Alle 12:11, domenica 13 febbraio 2005, T.J. Zeeman ha scritto:
>
> > Anyone around here that actually uses wine (32-bit, static, emul or
> > under a chroot)? With kernel 2.6.10?
>
> cedega runs fine warcraft3 on
Hi,
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 17:07 +0100, Erik Norman wrote:
> I entered the mirror domain:
> debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org
> then I added the directory:
> /pure64/dists/sid/main/binary-amd64/
Have you tried debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org for the server and either
pure64 or debian-pure64 for the p
Hi,
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 11:54 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "T.J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Does anybody around here have a 32-bit compiled wine running with kernel
> > 2.6.10? I tried to, but everything I throw at it segfaults.
>
Hi,
Does anybody around here have a 32-bit compiled wine running with kernel
2.6.10? I tried to, but everything I throw at it segfaults.
Reverting back to 2.6.8 gets me up and running with several apps again,
but the ones using some idiotic copy protection need a fix that went
into 2.6.10.
I've
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 11:50 +0100, Philippe wrote:
>
> is alioth dead ? I can't access faq or doc about installing debian
> amd64 is this a know problem ?
> (i'm a new subscriber but i haven't found anything about problem with
> alioth in ml archive)
A scheduled downtime. Lasts until tonight (du
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 10:19 +0100, Arnaud ESPANEL wrote:
> Maybe should i try with proprietary Matrox mga driver (with HAL), but i
> can't get it to compile with an amd64 kernel.
That's because Matrox does not yet provide a 64-bit compiled mga-hal.o
file with their sources yet. Several peop
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 12:49 +1300, Lee Begg wrote:
> Haven't had the nerve yet to try udev but would like to.
After a recent install of amd64 I installed udev and it worked out of
the box for me. No devfs-compatibility needed.
regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 16:08 +0100, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> ii j2re1.4 1.4.2.01-1Blackdown Java(TM) 2
> Runtime Environment, Standard Edition
>
> That's the correct version, right?
Yup.
> > The actual link in /etc/alternatives is wrong, but a little manual
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
