On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 08:21:11PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(which is still unofficial). Ans as security is a severe problem on any
server, I would recommend staying with Sarge/Stable and applying all security
updates (which aren't available in Etch/Testing an Sid/Unstable).
Etch now
I'm considering buying a box and putting the AMD64 port of sarge
on it.
I can see lots of problems with the AMD64 port on the mailing
list, but that doesn't make it clear whether troubles are normal
or unusual. Very few happy users ever write in to say how happy
they are,
I have had it proposed
On Thursday 22 December 2005 14:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering buying a box and putting the AMD64 port of sarge
on it.
we're running a production server on it. not had much testing yet, i'l know
within a month if its up to it :). its supported by the debian security team
though.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:34:29AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering buying a box and putting the AMD64 port of sarge
on it.
I can see lots of problems with the AMD64 port on the mailing
list, but that doesn't make it clear whether troubles are normal
or unusual. Very few
On Thursday 22 December 2005 15:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering buying a box and putting the AMD64 port of sarge
on it.
I can see lots of problems with the AMD64 port on the mailing
list, but that doesn't make it clear whether troubles are normal
or unusual. Very few happy
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:20:56PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:34:29AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering buying a box and putting the AMD64 port of sarge
on it.
I can see lots of problems with the AMD64 port on the mailing
list, but that
6 matches
Mail list logo
