Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *still* refuses mail

2006-10-07 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rescheduled. Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It now has finally been set up, thanks to Neuro. Excellent news all around; thanks, all! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a va

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *still* refuses mail

2006-10-07 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 12:14:24PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Even though the amd64 port's been official for half a year, mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] continues to bounce, as shown below. It now has finally been set up, thanks to Neuro. Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *still* refuses mail

2006-10-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 12:14:24PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Even though the amd64 port's been official for half a year, mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] continues to bounce, as shown below. I know, and there is little I can do about it. > Meanwhile, could somebody please requeue acl2? Reschedule

[EMAIL PROTECTED] *still* refuses mail

2006-10-06 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Even though the amd64 port's been official for half a year, mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] continues to bounce, as shown below. Meanwhile, could somebody please requeue acl2? --- Begin Message --- The original message was received at Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:20:09 -0400 (EDT) >From OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18