On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:21:10PM -0600, Ken Bloom wrote:
> The package may have been renamed to linux-image-* instead of
> kernel-image-*.
It certainly would have been. :)
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:09:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>It worked beautifully.
>>
>>A day or two ago, the URL seems to have changed.
>> http://tinyplanet.ca/~lsorense/amd64/
>>works now.
>
>
> I didn't know port 81 had ever worked on that machine. It is
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:49:54AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, I have a dumbass question: why is yaird necessary at all? Or more
> accurately, why is an initrd necessary at all? Is it something about
> 2.6.x kernels? Back when I built 2.4.x kernels for my Athlon XP machine,
> I follwe
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:46:48PM -0500, Robert Isaac wrote:
> You could even save yourself some effort and install Yaird from backports.org
> :)
It wasn't there when I did it. :)
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:49:54AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> and I never messed with an initrd. My understanding is that the purpose
> of an initrd is to provide an image of a RAMdisk containing the modules
> the kernel needs to access the root file system; but if the hardware and
> filesy
Robert Isaac wrote:
>
>> Upgrading past 2.6.12 requires getting yaird or initramfstools installed
>> on sarge somehow. It can be done however. Yaird is not too hard to
>> backport.
>
> You could even save yourself some effort and install Yaird from backports.org
> :)
OK, I have a dumbass que
> Upgrading past 2.6.12 requires getting yaird or initramfstools installed
> on sarge somehow. It can be done however. Yaird is not too hard to
> backport.
You could even save yourself some effort and install Yaird from backports.org :)
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:09:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It worked beautifully.
>
> A day or two ago, the URL seems to have changed.
> http://tinyplanet.ca/~lsorense/amd64/
> works now.
I didn't know port 81 had ever worked on that machine. It is run by one
of my friends.
> I now
On 1/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:49:41PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:50:22PM +, Jo Shields wrote:> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> >> > >I haven't accepted the new AMD-64 box the computer store has
> > >built for me
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:49:41PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:50:22PM +, Jo Shields wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >I haven't accepted the new AMD-64 box the computer store has
> > >built for me, because I can't get it to run in 64-bit mode.
> > >
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:55:15PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry to sound terminally stupid, but I don't know how to translate a
> URL like
> http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian-amd64/debian-amd64/pool/main/
> into a deb line for /etc/apt/sources.list
> And how does aptitude figure out w
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 01:52:19PM -0900, Greg Madden wrote:
>
> I use debian.csail.mit.edu.
> >
Sorry to sound terminally stupid, but I don't know how to translate a
URL like
http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian-amd64/debian-amd64/pool/main/
into a deb line for /etc/apt/sources.list
And how does
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:50:22PM +, Jo Shields wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I haven't accepted the new AMD-64 box the computer store has
> >built for me, because I can't get it to run in 64-bit mode.
> >
> >I provided the sarge net-install CD's for both AMD-64 and the older
> >386
On Sunday 15 January 2006 13:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I haven't accepted the new AMD-64 box the computer store has
> built for me, because I can't get it to run in 64-bit mode.
>
> I provided the sarge net-install CD's for both AMD-64 and the older
> 386 architectures.
>
> The netinstall for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't accepted the new AMD-64 box the computer store has
built for me, because I can't get it to run in 64-bit mode.
I provided the sarge net-install CD's for both AMD-64 and the older
386 architectures.
The netinstall for AMD64 went fine up to a point (except it w
I haven't accepted the new AMD-64 box the computer store has
built for me, because I can't get it to run in 64-bit mode.
I provided the sarge net-install CD's for both AMD-64 and the older
386 architectures.
The netinstall for AMD64 went fine up to a point (except it was 30 times
as slow
as the
16 matches
Mail list logo
