Re: AMD64 VS EM64T

2004-12-06 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 05:50:05AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > did you read > > http://www.tecchannel.de/hardware/1441/index.html ? A bunch of 32bit windows benchmarks run on 32bit windows XP. > Is that NOT providing what you meant ? Certainly not what I meant. Non of that article has an

Re: AMD64 VS EM64T

2004-12-04 Thread Peter Nelson
Jin Zhao wrote: I am currently faced with choosing one of them as our forthcoming 64 bit platform. So far I read a couple of reviews, most of which seems favor AMD64 a little bit. I also did some initial testings on an opteron box with Debian pure64 unstale. So far it looks good. Here's a review

Re: AMD64 VS EM64T

2004-12-04 Thread valentin_nils
Hi lennart, sorry I meant this link http://www.tecchannel.de/hardware/1456/index.html Its a Linux comparison (but only 32 bit - waiting for the 64 bit update) Best regards Nils Valentin > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:49:15PM +0900, Nils Valentin wrote: >> the

Re: AMD64 VS EM64T

2004-12-04 Thread valentin_nils
Lennart, did you read http://www.tecchannel.de/hardware/1441/index.html ? Is that NOT providing what you meant ? Best regards Nils Valentin > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:49:15PM +0900, Nils Valentin wrote: >> there is a 67 page Benchmark comparison be

Re: AMD64 VS EM64T

2004-12-03 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:49:15PM +0900, Nils Valentin wrote: > there is a 67 page Benchmark comparison betweeen the Athlon type CPUs and the > Pentium 4 types (including Prescott). The review does NOT include the > Opterons ;-(, but is has a lot of very detailed benchmark charts. 29 charts > f

Re: AMD64 VS EM64T

2004-12-03 Thread Nils Valentin
O.K I found one more article. Here are all 4 articles neatly listed up http://www.tecchannel.de/hardware/1441/index.html http://www.tecchannel.de/hardware/1456/index.html http://www.tecchannel.de/hardware/1244/index.html http://www.tecchannel.de/hardware/1235/index.html Best regards Nils Valenti

Re: AMD64 VS EM64T

2004-12-03 Thread Nils Valentin
Hi veverybody, also this two articles are only in german http://www.tecchannel.de/hardware/1441/index.html http://www.tecchannel.de/hardware/1456/index.html I still hope that somevody finds them useful. Best regards Nils Valentin Tokyo / Japan http://www.be-known-online.com On Friday 03 Dec

Re: AMD64 VS EM64T

2004-12-03 Thread Nils Valentin
Hi Everybody, there is a 67 page Benchmark comparison betweeen the Athlon type CPUs and the Pentium 4 types (including Prescott). The review does NOT include the Opterons ;-(, but is has a lot of very detailed benchmark charts. 29 charts for data transfers of each CPU alone + 35 benchmark chart

Re: AMD64 VS EM64T

2004-12-02 Thread Jin Zhao
Just found out this excellent article about server performance: http://www.samag.com/documents/s=9408/sam0411b/0411b.htm This is the best I read so far and I highly recommend it to everybody considering 64 bit. However, it is still purely from a hardware view. Does anybody knows any reviews fr

Re: AMD64 VS EM64T

2004-12-02 Thread Paolo Alexis Falcone
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:41:10 -0600, Jin Zhao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am currently faced with choosing one of them as our forthcoming 64 bit > platform. So far I read a couple of reviews, most of which seems favor > AMD64 a little bit. I also did some initial testings on an opteron box > with

AMD64 VS EM64T

2004-12-02 Thread Jin Zhao
I am currently faced with choosing one of them as our forthcoming 64 bit platform. So far I read a couple of reviews, most of which seems favor AMD64 a little bit. I also did some initial testings on an opteron box with Debian pure64 unstale. So far it looks good. The price differrence is not a