Re: ATI-drivers flickers was: ATI-driver will not start with 3D-acceleration (Update)

2006-03-13 Thread Thomas Drillich
Am Montag, 13. März 2006 00:37 schrieb sigi: Using the vesa-driver, the problem is less problematic. Did somebody get another solution than using the vesa-driver? seems a common problem follow the thread at http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248 -- mit freundlichem Gruss -- regards

Re: ATI-drivers flickers was: ATI-driver will not start with 3D-acceleration (Update)

2006-03-12 Thread sigi
Hi, I'm running a shuttle xpc st 20g5, with an ATI Radeon Xpress 200 on board graphics. But when I use the ati driver (8.22.5) it turns the dvi port off, and on every window redraw the desktop flickers horizontally. I do not have those problems with the std vesa driver. Do you had

ATI-drivers flickers was: ATI-driver will not start with 3D-acceleration (Update)

2006-03-10 Thread Thomas Drillich
Hello, I'm running a shuttle xpc st 20g5, with an ATI Radeon Xpress 200 on board graphics. But when I use the ati driver (8.22.5) it turns the dvi port off, and on every window redraw the desktop flickers horizontally. I do not have those problems with the std vesa driver. Do you had similar

ati drivers with last kernel

2005-11-11 Thread Lukasz Pieczara
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi i have problem with include module fglrx into new kernel. Script compile module with success, but show some warnings: *** Warning: unregister_ioctl32_conversion [/usr/src/modules/fglrx/fglrx.ko] undefined! *** Warning: register_ioctl32_conversion

Re: ati drivers with last kernel

2005-11-11 Thread Lukasz Pieczara
OK i found patch: http://www.stanchina.net/~flavio/debian/fglrx-archive/msg00908.html greetings -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ATI drivers for Debian 64 bit...

2005-09-26 Thread Jo Shields
Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote: On Sunday 25 September 2005 18:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm thinking that accelerated OpenGL drivers should be part of the distribution, with options available for choosing what flavor one would like to go with. I believe that this would make it easier on

Re: ATI drivers for Debian 64 bit...

2005-09-25 Thread Tobias Krais
Hi Peter, http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html for my notebook it did not work out. I had to change some things: http://www.design-to-use.de/linux/amilo_a1630/radeon9700.php This is a German page, but you will know what to do. Greetings, Tobias -- To

Re: ATI drivers for Debian 64 bit...

2005-09-25 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 25.09.2005 05:30:39, Sylvain Sauvage a écrit : Samedi 24 septembre 2005, 19:11:20 CEST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : I downloaded the ATI drivers, ran the installation shell script and I'm seeing no performance increase. Anyone have any advise? Has anyone documented what one needs to do

Re: ATI drivers for Debian 64 bit...

2005-09-25 Thread Sylvain Archenault
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: Le 25.09.2005 05:30:39, Sylvain Sauvage a écrit : Samedi 24 septembre 2005, 19:11:20 CEST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : I downloaded the ATI drivers, ran the installation shell script and I'm seeing no performance increase. Anyone have any advise? Has

Re: ATI drivers for Debian 64 bit...

2005-09-25 Thread Sylvain Sauvage
Dimanche 25 septembre 2005, 10:41:02 CEST, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) a écrit : [...] I failed to build the module on 64 bit architecture: /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/fglrx modules [...] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:124:25: error: asm/ioctl32.h: No

Re: ATI drivers for Debian 64 bit...

2005-09-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank's Tobias and everyone else, Looks like I'll be doing some playing around, as soon as I do an install to a new partition to my harddrive. This way, I don't end up nuking what's running now. I'm thinking that accelerated OpenGL drivers should be part of the distribution, with options

Re: ATI drivers for Debian 64 bit...

2005-09-25 Thread Ernest jw ter Kuile
On Sunday 25 September 2005 18:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm thinking that accelerated OpenGL drivers should be part of the distribution, with options available for choosing what flavor one would like to go with. I believe that this would make it easier on everyone. Very true. It's just

ATI drivers for Debian 64 bit...

2005-09-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I downloaded the ATI drivers, ran the installation shell script and I'm seeing no performance increase. Anyone have any advise? Has anyone documented what one needs to do? Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ATI drivers for Debian 64 bit...

2005-09-24 Thread Sylvain Sauvage
Samedi 24 septembre 2005, 19:11:20 CEST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : I downloaded the ATI drivers, ran the installation shell script and I'm seeing no performance increase. Anyone have any advise? Has anyone documented what one needs to do? Look here: http://xoomer.virgilio.it

Re: ATI Drivers

2005-04-12 Thread luk
John Baab wrote: I am attempting to install the ati drives located here: http://rufus.hackish.org/~rufus/files/fglrx/ Using the instructions in this faq: http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html /usr/src/modules/fglrx-kernel-src/agpgart_be.c: In function

ATI Drivers

2005-04-11 Thread John Baab
I am attempting to install the ati drives located here: http://rufus.hackish.org/~rufus/files/fglrx/ Using the instructions in this faq: http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html Which seems to be the recomendation around here. Now I am running into problems in

Re: xorg, transparency and ati drivers

2005-02-09 Thread Filippo Carone
* the owner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto: What is the ATI video card you use? Radeon 9200 with 128Mb I was originally interested in the improved open source Radeon code with DRI and have not tried the composite and transparency in your question. Try it if you can, as I'd like to know if

xorg, transparency and ati drivers

2005-02-08 Thread Filippo Carone
Hi everybody, I'm using the ubuntu Xorg server, with the composite and transparency correctly working. I'm also using the opensource radeon driver shipped with it. I get good 3D performances (~2000fps in windowed glxgears) but transparency (set by transset) is really slow, while I expected it to

Re: xorg, transparency and ati drivers

2005-02-08 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 12:52 +0100, Filippo Carone wrote: Hi everybody, I'm using the ubuntu Xorg server, with the composite and transparency correctly working. I'm also using the opensource radeon driver shipped with it. I get good 3D performances (~2000fps in windowed glxgears) but

Re: xorg, transparency and ati drivers

2005-02-08 Thread Filippo Carone
* Andrei Mikhailovsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto: Try fglrx and see for yourself ) I'm trying them, but: - glxgears runs at half speed (~800fps windowed) - if I enable the Composite extension in xorg.conf, DRI will be disabled: (II) fglrx(0): Composite extension enabled, disabling direct

Re: xorg, transparency and ati drivers

2005-02-08 Thread Lorenzo Milesi
I'm trying them, but: - glxgears runs at half speed (~800fps windowed) - if I enable the Composite extension in xorg.conf, DRI will be disabled: (II) fglrx(0): Composite extension enabled, disabling direct rendering (WW) fglrx(0): *** (WW)

Re: xorg, transparency and ati drivers

2005-02-08 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
I had similar DRI issue due the following things: 1. Have to load agpgart and the module that corresponds to your agp chipset (For instance on my Gigabyte K8NS Ultra 939 m/b I need agpgart and amd64_agp modules loaded) You'll need to check your hardware for the right modules 2. the

Re: xorg, transparency and ati drivers

2005-02-08 Thread the owner
f.carone wrote: Hi everybody, I'm using the ubuntu Xorg server, with the composite and transparency correctly working. I'm also using the opensource radeon driver shipped with it. I get good 3D performances (~2000fps in windowed glxgears) but transparency (set by transset) is really slow, while

ATI drivers installation - libglx.so

2005-02-04 Thread Lorenzo Milesi
I'm a little messed up trying to install ATI drivers. Due to a previous wrong Nvidia installation, now I (think I have) a corrupted libglx.so which needs libGLcore.so.1 contained in Nvidia binary packages. Sadly now I can't understand how to solve this thing. As from packages.debian.org libglx

Re: Shared library error compiling ATI drivers

2005-01-29 Thread Pedro I. Sanchez
Great, I worked without a single problem with a mobility Radeon 9700. $ glxgears 6125 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1225.000 FPS 7565 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1513.000 FPS Thanks! -- Pedro Peter Nelson wrote: Pedro I. Sanchez wrote: I'm following the steps in

Re: ati drivers again

2005-01-25 Thread Lukasz Pieczara
Dnia niedziela, 23 stycznia 2005 15:14, Lukasz Pieczara napisa: I don't know what's it? but it's not good i think... i have radeon 9550 with standard 2.6.9-10-amd64-k8 kernel, others option in my X config file: ModulePath /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules ModulePath /usr/X11R6/lib/modules

Re: ati drivers again

2005-01-23 Thread Lukasz Pieczara
Dnia niedziela, 23 stycznia 2005 03:26, Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] napisa: I had the same problem, and module-assistant seems to keep aside variables such as CC or GCC, so y rmoved symlinck from /usr/bin/gcc to /usr/bin/gcc-3.3 and replaced it with a new simlink from /usr/bin/gcc to

ati drivers again

2005-01-22 Thread Lukasz Pieczara
i try insert module into kernel; # modprobe fglrx FATAL: Error inserting fglrx (/lib/modules/2.6.8-10-amd64-k8/kernel/drivers/char/drm/fglrx.ko): Invalid module format dmesg returned: fglrx: version magic '2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 gcc-3.3' should be '2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 gcc-3.4' # cat /proc/version

Re: ati drivers again

2005-01-22 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 22.01.2005 22:25:21, Lukasz Pieczara a crit: i try insert module into kernel; # modprobe fglrx FATAL: Error inserting fglrx (/lib/modules/2.6.8-10-amd64-k8/kernel/drivers/char/drm/fglrx.ko): Invalid module format dmesg returned: fglrx: version magic '2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 gcc-3.3' should be