Bug#248043: closed by "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug #248043: ftp.debian.org: Request for new architecture: amd64)

2006-08-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
> > Debian bug tracking system administrator > (administrator, Debian Bugs database) > > From: "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug #248043: ftp.debian.org: Request for new architecture: amd64 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:4

Bug #248043: ftp.debian.org: Request for new architecture: amd64

2006-08-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, amd64 has been in sid for quite a while now, so I think we can close this now. :-) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#248043: ftp.debian.org: Request for new architecture: amd64

2005-03-22 Thread Kaare Hviid
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 03:16:39PM +1000, Dave Whitla wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > > >This will happen post-sarge, amd64 will not get released with sarge, and > >adding it to sid now would only cause more work that can better be spent > >elsewhere (read: releasing sarge). > > > >--J

Bug#248043: ftp.debian.org: Request for new architecture: amd64

2005-03-21 Thread Dave Whitla
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: This will happen post-sarge, amd64 will not get released with sarge, and adding it to sid now would only cause more work that can better be spent elsewhere (read: releasing sarge). --Jeroen (read: "I don't own an AMD64") -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#248043: ftp.debian.org: Request for new architecture: amd64

2005-03-18 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 10:03:13PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > the debian amd64 port is rapidly maturing and apart from beeing so new > its reaching a point where the goals needed for it to be released > would be met (i.e. D-I support, most packages compiled, ...). > > Amd64 was recently disc